Solar workflow depth
Can the product carry system details, proposal status, project milestones, and the delivery handoff without rebuilding the process in custom fields?
Quickest Solar CRM ranks first for a focused mobile path from lead to proposal and follow-up, subject to a written Australian fit check. We compare it with seven alternatives using current evidence on STCs, SAA accreditation, approved products, batteries, export limits, design, project delivery, privacy, and public pricing.
Direct answer
Quickest Solar CRM is our number-one proposal-first choice for an Australian solar team that values fast mobile adoption, simple pipeline ownership, and a low-friction starting point. Its public product remains India-first, so an Australian buyer must obtain written confirmation for AUD and GST, CER and SAA records, STC calculations, approved components, export limits, batteries, five-year record retention, local integrations, privacy, and support. SolarPlus has the strongest documented Australian design-to-compliance workflow among the products checked.
8 jobs, 8 picks
A useful shortlist starts with the sales or delivery bottleneck. Each winner below reflects a different buying priority, while the overall ranking rewards a CRM that a solar sales team can adopt quickly.
Australian solar sales teams testing mobile proposals and disciplined follow-up
Indian public pricing. Pro requires at least three users. Confirm Australian commercial terms. 02Best Australian workflow depthSolarPlusResidential, commercial, and off-grid teams connecting design, sales, compliance, and handover
Starter annual prepay. Australian onboarding starts at A$500; subscription prices exclude GST for Australian clients. 03Best low-cost Australian all-in-oneSolarHub CRMSmall and growing Australian teams wanting leads, design, proposals, and projects in one web platform
Standard monthly price. Annual billing lists A$26/month. Plans use tokens and design limits. 04Best pay-per-project design plus CRMPylonDesign-led solar and battery sellers that want usage pricing and an optional specialist CRM
Currency is not labelled beside captured subscription prices. Confirm it at checkout before budgeting. 05Best free core solar platformOpenSolarTeams prioritising free core design, customer proposals, CRM, and project management
Premium imagery, API, connectors, payments, finance, hardware, or partner services may add cost. 06Best compliance-ready proposalsSolar ProofAustralian teams needing fast design, STC-aware proposals, interval analysis, and compliant templates
Five free projects listed. Confirm currency and GST treatment before budgeting. 07Best field and job operationsSimproElectrical contractors managing crews, materials, projects, compliance records, invoicing, and service
Pricing depends on team and add-ons. Initial setup covers onboarding, training, and migration. 08Best configurable general CRMZoho CRMMarketing-led or multi-division companies with an owner for customization and integrations
The official page offers an AUD selector. Recheck live amounts and local taxes before publication.How we evaluated
We reviewed the live Australian search results, current Clean Energy Regulator and Solar Accreditation Australia material, consumer and privacy guidance, and official product and pricing pages. The overall order gives extra weight to whether a small or growing sales team can adopt the CRM, issue a clear proposal, and maintain follow-up. We assess Australian compliance and delivery depth separately because it can change the correct choice for a particular company. We publish no numerical product scores because public documentation cannot establish day-to-day usability, support quality, or plan-specific behaviour with enough precision.
Can the product carry system details, proposal status, project milestones, and the delivery handoff without rebuilding the process in custom fields?
Can managers route leads, track activity, automate follow-up, forecast revenue, and see why an opportunity stalled?
Can a rep move from site information to a credible customer proposal, and how much specialist solar design happens inside the platform?
Does the workflow support the language, currency, tax, communications, documents, and handoffs common in Australia?
What setup, migration, training, administration, and extra software does the apparent subscription require?
At-a-glance matrix
The table separates CRM depth from proposal, design, and operations coverage. Confirm plan limits and country availability in writing before signing.
Local billing check: confirm AUD pricing, tax treatment, contract currency, and payment fees in writing.
| Platform | Best for | Public price | Solar proposals | Design | Project operations | CRM depth | Free access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Quickest Solar CRM | Australian solar sales teams testing mobile proposals and disciplined follow-up | Free; Pro ₹6,999/user/year | Core strength; Australian outputs require validation | Proposal inputs, not documented as complete Australian PV design | Lead and pipeline workflow | Focused solar sales CRM | 10 proposals monthly for one user |
| 2SolarPlus | Residential, commercial, and off-grid teams connecting design, sales, compliance, and handover | From US$135/month annually | Custom solar and battery proposals | Deep residential, commercial, battery, and off-grid modelling | Compliance and installation handoff | Built-in solar sales CRM | Demo; no permanent free plan documented |
| 3SolarHub CRM | Small and growing Australian teams wanting leads, design, proposals, and projects in one web platform | Free; paid from A$29/month | Solar and battery quotes with e-signature | Solar and battery design, shading, SLD, and strings | Project, scheduling, invoice, and install tracking | Solar-specific lead CRM | Free plan for 3 users |
| 4Pylon | Design-led solar and battery sellers that want usage pricing and an optional specialist CRM | $4 or $10/project; CRM from $49/user/month | Web and PDF proposals with e-signature | Strong solar, battery, shading, and interval-data design | Job sheets, SLDs, owner manual, and integrations | Optional solar CRM add-on | Trial without card; five Standard credits listed |
| 5OpenSolar | Teams prioritising free core design, customer proposals, CRM, and project management | Core professional platform free | Custom solar proposals with e-signature and payments | Core solar and battery design strength | Project management and hardware workflow | Built-in lead and project CRM | Core platform free |
| 6Solar Proof | Australian teams needing fast design, STC-aware proposals, interval analysis, and compliant templates | $4/project or Pro from $99/month | Strong editable solar and battery proposals | 3D shade, interval data, SLD, and multi-battery | Installer portal and integrations; verify job depth | Proposal companion rather than proven deep CRM | Five projects |
| 7Simpro | Electrical contractors managing crews, materials, projects, compliance records, invoicing, and service | Custom quote plus setup | Electrical estimating and quoting | No native solar production design verified | Deep scheduling, field, inventory, job cost, and finance | CRM within a field service platform | Demo; no permanent free plan documented |
| 8Zoho CRM | Marketing-led or multi-division companies with an owner for customization and integrations | Free for 3 users; paid AUD price dynamic | Generic CPQ and document workflow by plan | Requires specialist solar design software | Custom modules and integrations required | Deep general CRM | Free edition for 3 users |
Pricing and capability labels were checked against official sources on 6 September 2026. Currency conversion is intentionally omitted where a vendor does not publish a local price.
Country research
An Australian solar job carries more than a contact, price, and deal stage. It can include STC assumptions, accredited people, approved components, system performance, feed-in tariff and export-limit information, battery eligibility, grid connection records, geotagged photographs, written statements, and a long-lived customer handover. A useful CRM connects those records to the people and tasks responsible for them.
The Clean Energy Regulator's postcode dataset recorded 4,501,887 solar PV systems with 30,323,323 kW of rated output as of 31 July 2026. The regulator warns that recent figures continue to rise because certificates may be created within 12 months, and the dataset excludes pending or failed applications. That distinction matters in a CRM. Installation date, certificate status, and evidence status should be separate fields so a manager does not treat an installed system, a submitted claim, and an approved claim as the same milestone.
Clean Energy Regulator: Small-scale installation postcode data ↗A small-scale technology certificate represents 1 MWh of eligible renewable electricity generated, stored, or displaced. The number of certificates depends on geography, installation date, generation or displacement, and usable battery capacity. A proposal that presents an STC benefit should preserve its calculation date, zone or postcode inputs, certificate quantity, assumed certificate value, assignment method, and the person who approved the figure. The CRM should keep the original basis when a quote is revised rather than silently replacing yesterday's commercial assumption with today's value.
Clean Energy Regulator: Small-scale technology certificates ↗As of this review, the regulator states that an eligible rooftop PV system has capacity below 100 kW and annual output below 250 MWh. On 5 August 2026 the Australian Government announced an intended expansion from 100 kW to 1 MW for systems installed from 1 October 2026, subject to regulations. The regulator also says applications will not open until the required systems are ready. A CRM should therefore store the rule version and eligibility decision used on each project. It should not apply the proposed threshold early or rewrite older deals without review.
Clean Energy Regulator: Rooftop solar eligibility and installation guidance ↗Solar Accreditation Australia says only its accredited designers and installers can interact with the Small-scale Renewable Energy Scheme. Grid-connected PV, grid-connected battery systems, and stand-alone power systems are distinct accreditation classes. The Clean Energy Regulator also requires accredited and licensed people, approved modules and inverters, local connection requirements, and installation evidence. The CRM should verify accreditation type and status against the work being assigned, preserve product and licence references, and prevent a salesperson from treating a person's name as proof of eligibility for every system class.
Solar Accreditation Australia: About SAA accreditation ↗The installer guidance calls for photographic evidence at setup, mid-installation, and testing and commissioning. Photos should show the accredited installer, include date and time metadata and geolocation, and align with the compliance paperwork. A return visit to recreate the evidence is not acceptable. Field capture is therefore a genuine CRM and job-system requirement. Test whether the mobile app keeps original metadata, works with weak reception, links each image to the right job and stage, records who uploaded it, and prevents casual replacement after review.
Clean Energy Regulator: Rooftop solar installers and designers ↗Retailers must provide written information before sale and installation, including the accepted quote or contract, accredited designer and installer details, performance limits, feed-in tariffs, export limits, expected payback, expected energy and cost savings, and conflicts of interest. They must also complete written statements and keep required records for at least five years. This is why a generic completed status is insufficient. The system needs versioned customer documents, named owners, signatures, equipment and connection details, and a retention policy that survives staff changes and ordinary account housekeeping.
Clean Energy Regulator: Rooftop solar and solar battery retailers ↗Battery eligibility adds a second ruleset. The regulator says an eligible system generally has 5 to 100 kWh nominal capacity, is new, sits with solar PV no larger than 100 kW, uses a CEC-approved battery, meets AS/NZS 5139:2019 and local safety requirements, and is installed by an appropriately endorsed SAA accreditee. Only the first 50 kWh of usable capacity can receive certificates, and only one battery system per premises can be claimed. The CRM must distinguish nominal from usable capacity and check prior-claim status rather than copying solar fields into a battery quote.
Clean Energy Regulator: Solar battery eligibility and certificate rules ↗The New Energy Tech Consumer Code describes standards across sales, quotes and contracts, delivery, installation, warranties, support, and complaints. Approved sellers commit to honest, accurate and fair sales practices, clear comprehensive documents, and prompt resolution of problems. A software template cannot guarantee compliant conduct. It can help by controlling approved wording, tracking document versions, recording consent and acceptance, restricting discounts, logging complaints, assigning warranty work, and showing whether the customer received the material promised before signing.
New Energy Tech Consumer Code: Consumer protection standards for new energy technology ↗A solar CRM can hold names, addresses, energy bills, property images, signatures, finance notes, call records, and identity or meter details. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner says the 13 Australian Privacy Principles govern collection, use, disclosure, governance, data quality and correction, and individual access for organisations covered by the Privacy Act. Buyers should review contracts, subprocessors, storage and access locations, permissions, retention, deletion, audit records, incident support, and complete export. A data-centre location alone does not answer those questions.
Office of the Australian Information Commissioner: Australian Privacy Principles ↗Full reviews
Each review explains the useful workflow, the buyer who should shortlist it, and the country-specific question that a sales demo must answer.
Quickest is the first product we would trial for fast proposal adoption, but an Australian team should reject a rollout until every required local capability and contract term passes a written acceptance test.
Quickest keeps the sales promise easy to understand: bring solar leads into one place, assign ownership, create a branded proposal quickly, send and follow up from a mobile-oriented workflow, and give the manager a visible pipeline. Its public free plan includes 10 proposals per month for one user. Pro is listed at ₹6,999 per user per year with a three-user minimum. That makes it possible to test a change in sales habits without beginning with a large implementation. A small team can measure response time, proposal turnaround, follow-up completion, duplicate work, and manager visibility using genuine opportunities.
The number-one position reflects that proposal-first value and adoption lens. It does not mean Quickest has the deepest verified Australian feature set. The public pages describe an Indian product with INR prices, Indian GST and subsidy calculations, DISCOM logic, Indian solar assumptions, India-specific lead sources, and Mumbai hosting. We found no public documentation for AUD billing, Australian GST, CER and SAA records, solar or battery STCs, CEC approved products, NMI or distributor fields, export limits, Australian tariffs, five-year retention, local accounting, local data terms, or Australian support hours. Each item requires written confirmation.
Run the acceptance test before importing live customer data. The sales user should create and revise an AUD solar quote and battery quote. Operations should attach the design, accreditation and product evidence, connection approval, export conditions, accepted documents, written statements, and original installation photographs. Finance should test GST, deposit, invoice, credit, payment, and export. The privacy review should cover contract party, subprocessors, storage and support access, retention, deletion, security, incident handling, and complete export. Quickest deserves adoption consideration only if it passes the same Australian job that the local specialists must pass.
Choose it if: the first objective is consistent mobile proposals and follow-up, and Quickest passes every Australian acceptance and contract check. Choose another platform if: the business needs proven Australian design, compliance, STC, connection, field, or accounting depth before changing its sales process.
SolarPlus has the strongest documented Australian design-to-compliance workflow in this shortlist and is the most credible alternative when local technical depth outweighs a lightweight sales start.
SolarPlus describes a connected path from initial enquiry through installation. Its built-in CRM tracks customers and sales, while the design layer covers solar, batteries, interval data, time-of-use behaviour, peak demand, peak shaving, energy arbitrage, EVs, hot water, hybrid systems, off-grid work, and commercial financial analysis. Proposals can use branded templates, options, formulas, equipment pricing, payments, and Xero sync. The public feature list also names scheduling, sales reports, compliant design checks, Job Safety Analysis, and a one-click system owner manual. This breadth is valuable when the same site and equipment data currently move through separate design, sales, and operations tools.
Pricing uses average quoted capacity across a three-month period. Annual prepay is US$135 per month for Starter, US$260 for Pro, and US$450 for Complete. Monthly billing is US$150, US$300, and US$520. Starter includes five designer accounts, Pro ten plus free installer access, and Complete unlimited users. Australian customer subscription costs exclude GST, with GST-inclusive amounts shown at checkout. QuickStart onboarding is A$500 and KickStart A$1,000. Compare the capacity allowance with typical residential and commercial volume, then add imagery, setup, training, templates, and any extra service.
Australian positioning and compliance tooling still need an output test. Build one residential solar job, one battery retrofit, and one commercial interval-data project. Compare STC calculations with the current authoritative process. Check exact product approval references, accreditation fields, NMI and distributor stages, export conditions, accepted document versions, installation photographs, written statements, and five-year export. SolarPlus is the strongest documented local workflow in this review, but a broad feature list does not prove every CER, state, network, or contract requirement. Put missing integrations and configured deliverables into the implementation scope.
Choose it if: the company wants detailed Australian design, financial modelling, proposals, CRM, compliance preparation, and handover close together. Choose another platform if: the immediate need is a low-cost lead and follow-up tool, or the team wants to keep design in a separate specialist platform.
SolarHub CRM offers the clearest low-cost Australian all-in-one entry point, though its current public pages leave several compliance and integration details for the trial.
SolarHub CRM presents itself for Australian solar retailers and installers. The public product page links lead capture and assignment, automated follow-up, solar and battery design, shading, strings and DC cable work, single-line diagrams, professional proposals, e-signatures, invoices, payment tracking, scheduling, team roles, reporting, and project or installation status. This is a sensible feature shape for a company leaving spreadsheets because the salesperson, designer, office coordinator, and manager can begin from one shared job rather than emailing versions between systems. The free plan gives a small team a practical way to inspect the workflow.
The official pricing page contains AUD structured data. Free includes 50 tokens monthly, 25 solar or battery quotes, five designs, 500 stored leads, and up to three users. Standard is A$29 monthly or A$26 per month annually with 300 tokens, 30 designs, and five included users. Premium is A$49 or A$44 with 500 tokens, 50 designs, and seven users. Pro is A$199 or A$180 with 2,000 tokens, 200 designs, and 20 users. Included tokens reset each month, while purchased token add-ons are stated to last 12 months. Confirm taxes and extra-user pricing in checkout.
The checked pages did not document native STC or Greenbank submission, SAA accreditation validation, CEC approved-product checks, NETCC templates, NMI or distributor connections, export-limit controls, Xero or MYOB, photograph metadata, or five-year evidence retention. That does not prove the features are absent. It makes them demo questions. Use the free tier to calculate exactly how tokens are consumed, revise a battery project, capture a field record, export attachments, and test support. SolarHub ranks third because it combines local positioning, visible AUD entry prices, and broad solar workflow coverage with a low adoption barrier.
Choose it if: a small Australian team wants an affordable shared system for leads, solar design, proposals, signatures, and project visibility. Choose another platform if: the buyer needs deeply documented compliance, tariff modelling, field operations, or enterprise integration before go-live.
Pylon is the strongest usage-priced option when accurate design and customer proposals drive the sale and the buyer wants to add CRM only where it creates value.
Pylon begins with system design. It documents high-resolution imagery, panel placement, battery sizing, interval data, time-of-use scenarios, 3D shading, financial projections, web and PDF proposals, digital signatures, finance options, payments, single-line diagrams, voltage-rise reports, installer job sheets, and system owner manuals. Its pricing table references AS/NZS 5033:2021 and lists different maximum DC system sizes by plan. For an Australian salesperson, the attraction is that the proposed layout, production, battery behaviour, and customer economics live close to the document being presented rather than arriving as a detached PDF from another team.
Standard design is listed at $4 per project and Pro at $10. Pro adds custom load profiles, battery design, and larger commercial projects. The optional solar CRM starts at $49 per user per month and includes project links, email sync, automatic lead processing, SMS, web forms, and AI assistance. E-signatures are listed at $0.80 per project. Payment processing is 2.5 percent per transaction, with that fee stated to include GST. The captured page does not label the subscription currency beside its dollar amounts. Confirm currency, tax, credits, project definition, imagery, API, SMS, and support at checkout.
Public integrations include Facebook, Xero, Mailchimp, ServiceM8, and Smart Ease, with API access under enterprise terms. The checked page did not establish complete solar and battery STC submission, current CEC approval validation, SAA status checks, distributor application, NETCC document control, or five-year evidence retention. Run each required handoff. Pay close attention to revisions: change the interval data, battery size, inverter, and export limit, then check the proposal, CRM, job sheet, owner manual, accounting record, and exported data. Pylon ranks fourth because its technical sales workflow and public usage prices are unusually clear.
Choose it if: the sales process starts with solar and battery design and the team wants transparent usage billing plus an optional CRM. Choose another platform if: the company needs a broader Australian compliance and field operating system with fewer external handoffs.
OpenSolar provides the broadest free core route from solar design to proposal and project work, but teams that connect several external systems must price the complete data flow.
OpenSolar says its professional platform is free for solar businesses, funded by manufacturers, finance providers, distributors, and other partners. The product page covers automated solar design, batteries, EVs, heat pumps, customer proposals, lead capture, CRM, project management, roles and permissions, e-signature, payments, hardware ordering, imagery, and an enterprise API. A small team can keep the design, customer presentation, and project record inside one platform without beginning with a paid seat. A larger sales operation should still assess lead routing, attribution, communication sequences, service cases, management permissions, and reporting rather than assuming every CRM function has equal depth.
OpenSolar's 2026 release notes provide useful Australian evidence. Release 3.8 added an Australian mounting bill-of-materials calculator. Release 3.7 introduced the imagery marketplace in Australia and New Zealand. Release 3.6 expanded QuickBooks support across Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Release 3.5 mentioned improvements to Greenbank STC job submission, while release 3.3 improved Xero integration. These are more specific than a generic global availability claim. Each connection can still depend on market, partner, plan, or workflow, so the buyer should demonstrate the live account used by its team.
Free core access does not make the whole stack free. Premium imagery, API access, supported connectors, finance, payments, hardware purchasing, or partner services can carry separate charges or transaction terms. List every system that must send or receive customer, design, accounting, STC, installation, and reporting data. Then test a failed sync and a complete export. Confirm SAA and CEC records, distributor and export stages, battery fields, accepted document versions, geotagged evidence, and retention. OpenSolar ranks fifth because the free core is compelling, while this list gives more weight to focused CRM adoption and clearly packaged local workflows.
Choose it if: the team wants to design, present, and manage solar projects largely inside a capable free core platform. Choose another platform if: the company needs deeper field operations, a tightly controlled sales CRM, or several guaranteed external integrations.
Solar Proof is the most locally explicit proposal and design companion in this comparison, but buyers should not mistake proposal depth for a complete standalone CRM.
Solar Proof focuses on the technical customer document. It documents residential, commercial, and battery design, power-bill data extraction, high-resolution imagery, 3D shade analysis, interval-data modelling, solar simulation, single-line diagrams, finance comparisons, multi-battery configurations, product catalogues, integrations, and editable proposals. Its Australian features are stated directly: solar and battery STC calculations, Cheaper Home Batteries support, and proposal templates described as NETCC and CEC compliant. These capabilities make it a strong shortlist tool when salespeople need credible technical and financial outputs without waiting for a specialist to rebuild every proposal.
The current pricing page lists pay-as-you-go access at $4 per project, with credits that do not expire and five free projects. Pro starts at $99 per month, is billed monthly, and offers a stated 20 percent saving on annual payment. Both routes include design and professional PDF proposals, while Pro adds larger project volume, branding, multi-user access, API and integrations, and unlimited single-line diagrams. The page says the business is Australian owned and operated. The captured price does not clearly label its currency or GST treatment, so confirm both before publishing a cost comparison or signing.
Solar Proof's public pages do not establish the lead routing, communication automation, forecasting, complaint handling, field scheduling, job costing, invoice control, and management reporting expected from a deep CRM or operations platform. It may fit beside Quickest, Zoho, Simpro, or another system of record. Test whether accepted system, equipment, incentive, and customer data remain structured when handed off, and whether revisions return without duplication. Verify current calculation sources, approval-list refreshes, accreditation records, network stages, evidence metadata, and retention. Solar Proof ranks sixth because it solves a vital Australian proposal problem but covers less of the customer lifecycle publicly.
Choose it if: the priority is producing detailed Australian solar and battery proposals with explicit STC and consumer-document support. Choose another platform if: the team needs one deep system for lead nurturing, project delivery, field scheduling, job costing, and aftercare.
Simpro is the strongest option for installation operations and financial control, provided the contractor connects a specialist solar design and STC workflow where needed.
Simpro is a field service and project platform for trade businesses. Its base plan documents lead and customer management, estimating and quoting, scheduling and dispatch, field and contractor work, inventory and purchasing, invoicing and payments, reporting, sites, vendors, employees, and work orders. The electrical product pages add supplier pricing, material and labour estimating, project stages, variations, mobile notes and photographs, compliance forms, work-in-progress reporting, progress billing, maintenance, and service. This depth suits an installer whose largest losses happen after the sale through scheduling gaps, material errors, unrecorded variations, incomplete field evidence, or slow billing.
Simpro publishes no simple seat price. The pricing page says the subscription is tailored to team size and selected add-ons, with monthly or annual billing. It also states that an initial setup fee covers onboarding, training, and data migration, with the amount depending on complexity, customization, and support. Digital Forms, data feeds, takeoffs, fleet tracking, maintenance planning, SMS, and phone functions are among the add-ons. Official integrations include Xero, MYOB, QuickBooks, Stripe, Square, email and calendar tools, HubSpot, Mailchimp, Zapier, and an API. Request one complete implementation and two-year operating quote.
The checked official pages did not establish native solar array production modelling, battery economics, current STC calculations, CEC product validation, SAA accreditation checks, or direct distributor submission. Simpro can store tasks, forms, attachments, and evidence around those processes, but technical work may remain in SolarPlus, Pylon, OpenSolar, Solar Proof, or another design platform. Test the accepted-design handoff, component substitution, field metadata, written statements, retention, customer handover, and accounting sync. Simpro ranks seventh because it is less solar-specific at the sale, yet it can outrank most products for a multi-crew contractor focused on operational margin.
Choose it if: the business manages several crews and needs better control of labour, materials, variations, field records, invoices, and project margin. Choose another platform if: the main need is fast solar design, STC-aware proposals, or lightweight lead follow-up for a small sales team.
Zoho is a credible general CRM for a company prepared to design its own Australian solar process, but it is the least complete out-of-the-box solar workflow in this shortlist.
Zoho CRM offers broad contact, lead, opportunity, activity, email, calling, form, pipeline, forecasting, approval, reporting, mobile, portal, API, and automation functions. Paid tiers add custom modules, process management, inventory, CPQ, customer journeys, field-level controls, sandboxes, and more advanced analytics. A solar company can create properties, NMIs, system records, distributors, proposals, installation stages, and service cases through configuration. This flexibility is useful for a business that sells more than solar or already uses the Zoho suite. It also requires a named system owner who understands both CRM design and the Australian solar process.
The free edition supports three users and includes contact management, follow-up reminders, workflow automation, tasks, reports, data import and export, APIs, and mobile apps. The official page contains an AUD currency selector, but amounts load dynamically and the captured version displayed another regional currency. It also says local taxes can be charged in addition to listed prices. Do not publish an AUD amount from a converted or cached page. Obtain the current local checkout or sales quote, then add implementation, modules, storage, messaging, telephony, support, integrations, migration, and the staff time required to administer the system.
Zoho does not become a solar design or compliance platform because it can store custom fields. The checked official pricing page did not prove native production modelling, current solar and battery STC calculations, SAA or CEC validation, distributor application, export-limit modelling, NETCC documents, or installation evidence rules. Connect a specialist tool and test the field-level sync, duplicate logic, revision history, errors, retries, and export. Zoho ranks eighth because every local solar layer needs more design work. It can still be the right front office for a larger marketing team that values general CRM depth and accepts the implementation responsibility.
Choose it if: the company needs general sales and marketing depth, has several divisions, and can own a configured solar stack. Choose another platform if: a small team wants Australian solar design, proposals, STCs, field evidence, and project stages with less configuration.
Buyer guide
Choose by the most expensive broken handoff, then test that handoff using real opportunities, real users, and the documents your customers actually receive.
Use Quickest to test whether a focused mobile proposal and follow-up routine changes daily sales behaviour. Use Pylon when pay-per-project design fits irregular volume, or OpenSolar when a free core design and project platform is more useful. Before putting Australian customer data or prices into Quickest, obtain written confirmation for AUD, GST, STCs, local documents, privacy terms, export, and support. The cheapest tool is the one the owner can use consistently without rebuilding every job in spreadsheets.
Quickest is the tighter adoption test for lead-to-proposal speed. SolarPlus documents a wider Australian journey across design, interval data, proposals, CRM, compliance workflows, handover, and Xero. Run the same solar-only and battery deals in both products. If the largest loss is slow sales follow-up, Quickest can win after local verification. If errors occur between design, compliance, and installation, SolarPlus has the stronger documented starting position.
SolarHub publishes an AUD free plan and low paid entry prices with leads, design, proposals, e-signature, and project tracking. OpenSolar offers a free core platform around design, proposals, CRM, and project work. Test token or project limits, paid imagery and connectors, accepted-quote revisions, STC handoff, component records, and support. A free plan is valuable only if the paid route remains sensible when the team adds users, integrations, storage, and installation volume.
Pylon connects detailed design and customer proposals to an optional CRM and publishes usage-based prices. Solar Proof documents Australian STC calculations, battery incentive support, NETCC and CEC templates, interval data, shade analysis, and single-line diagrams. Use Solar Proof as a design and compliance companion unless its CRM depth passes the full sales test. Choose between them by running a tariff-rich battery quote, a component revision, and a complete accepted-proposal handoff.
Simpro is built around estimating, scheduling, field work, materials, job costing, invoicing, reporting, and mobile compliance records. Pair it with Pylon, OpenSolar, Solar Proof, or SolarPlus when technical solar design and STC calculations remain outside the operations platform. Test whether accepted system data enters Simpro without duplicate typing and whether later substitutions return to the proposal and compliance record. This segment should buy around quote-to-cash and field evidence, not marketing automation alone.
Zoho can support forms, campaign sources, several pipelines, approvals, reporting, portals, APIs, and custom modules. That flexibility suits a company with someone responsible for CRM design and governance. It does not remove the need for solar production modelling, approved components, STCs, grid and export records, or field evidence. Price the administrator, implementation, and specialist integrations alongside licences. A general CRM can be a strong front office when the company deliberately owns the local solar workflow behind it.
Run the same three opportunities in every shortlisted CRM: one ordinary lead, one revision-heavy project, and one deal that already failed. This removes demo theatre and exposes repeated entry, stale documents, weak mobile adoption, and missing local support.
Capture a real lead, assign it, create the proposal, schedule follow-up, record acceptance, and hand it to delivery.
Change the system, equipment, price, payment route, and installation date. Identify every stale record.
Use a duplicate, missed follow-up, rejected proposal, or delayed job and ask the CRM to show what happens next.
Create a quote in Australian dollars using your real modules, inverters, batteries, labour, travel, finance fees, discounts, and deposit structure. Confirm how the product shows GST-inclusive and GST-exclusive prices, rounds totals, handles mixed line items, and preserves the tax treatment on revisions and credits. The administrator should control changes through permissions and an audit trail. A vendor accepting an Australian card does not prove that its proposal and invoice logic fits Australian sales documents.
Run one solar project and one battery project through the current Small-scale Renewable Energy Scheme logic. Check postcode, installation date, capacity, deeming or usable-capacity inputs, certificate count, certificate price assumption, customer assignment, and claim status. Change the installation date and equipment after the first proposal and inspect every affected value. Require the system to preserve what the customer accepted and identify the rule or integration version rather than overwriting the commercial record silently.
Store each designer's and installer's accreditation number, class, status, licence details, and expiry date. Test a grid-connected PV job, a grid-connected battery job, and a stand-alone project because the accreditation requirements differ. The workflow should warn when the assigned person does not hold the required class or when evidence expires before the installation date. If the vendor claims automatic checking, ask it to show the source, refresh frequency, exception handling, and saved evidence.
Use the actual module, inverter, and battery products from a recent job. Confirm whether the catalogue records exact model numbers and approval validity for the planned installation date. Then replace a component after customer acceptance. The design, quote, purchase record, connection application, installation pack, STC evidence, and handover should remain aligned. A broad manufacturer name or current catalogue entry is not enough when the specific model, approval date, warranty, and installed item determine eligibility and customer expectations.
Capture the National Metering Identifier, retailer, electricity network or DNSP, connection route, proposed inverter capacity, requested export, approved export, application reference, conditions, status, and responsible person. Test a revision after the distributor changes the permitted export. The customer proposal and savings model should label the export assumption and avoid presenting a feed-in tariff or export capacity as guaranteed. Direct submission should be claimed only after the vendor demonstrates it for the networks you serve.
Build a battery quote that distinguishes inverter power in kW, nominal energy capacity in kWh, usable capacity, certificate-eligible capacity, prior battery claims at the premises, approved product status, VPP capability, and the relevant SAA endorsement. Test multiple battery units and an existing PV system. The product should explain which value drives design, backup behaviour, customer economics, and incentive eligibility. A visually polished quote can still be wrong if it merges power and energy or applies the solar rules to storage.
Have an installer capture setup, mid-installation, and commissioning photographs from the field app. Inspect original metadata, geolocation, timestamps, user identity, upload history, offline behaviour, and attachment limits. Then export the complete record. Confirm that required information, accepted documents, written statements, photos, and approvals can be retained for at least five years under your plan and contract. A thumbnail in an activity feed is not sufficient if metadata disappears or the attachment cannot be exported.
Compare the generated quote and contract with your approved consumer documents. Confirm system performance and limitations, feed-in and export assumptions, expected savings and payback, warranties, payment milestones, cancellation information, installer details, and every promised attachment. Test e-signature identity, document locking, accepted timestamps, later variations, and customer access. Add a complaint and warranty case to the same customer history so aftercare teams can see what was sold, accepted, installed, and previously promised.
Connect the accounting system used by the business and follow one customer from accepted quote to deposit, progress payment, invoice, credit, and reconciliation. Check GST, customer, product, project, payment, and attachment fields in both directions. Test website, Meta, Google, referral, and partner leads, plus duplicate handling and source attribution. Add supplier price changes and equipment substitutions. Integration logos should be followed by a field-level demonstration, error log, retry process, support owner, and current connector cost.
Request the service agreement, privacy and security terms, subprocessor list, storage and support-access locations, backup and recovery information, incident process, retention controls, and account closure procedure. Import a redacted sample with contacts, properties, energy bills, notes, activities, consent status, designs, quotes, signatures, and photos. Then export it. Confirm role permissions, audit logs, marketing suppression, correction and deletion workflows, file formats, API access, minimum term, setup cost, and assistance available when leaving.
The real budget
Public pricing spans a free focused CRM or free core design platform, pay-per-project design, lower-cost Australian subscriptions, mid-market design suites, and custom operations software. These products buy different parts of the workflow. A fair budget includes users, design or token volume, onboarding, migration, imagery, e-signature, SMS, payments, accounting, API access, support, storage, compliance forms, field users, and the staff time needed to maintain integrations and rule changes.
Indian public pricing. Pro requires at least three users. Confirm Australian commercial terms.
Starter annual prepay. Australian onboarding starts at A$500; subscription prices exclude GST for Australian clients.
Standard monthly price. Annual billing lists A$26/month. Plans use tokens and design limits.
Currency is not labelled beside captured subscription prices. Confirm it at checkout before budgeting.
Quickest publishes a free plan with 10 proposals per month for one user and a Pro plan at ₹6,999 per user per year with a three-user minimum. Those are Indian commercial terms. Do not convert them into an Australian price or imply that the paid plan is sold locally on identical terms. Request AUD billing, GST treatment, payment method, contract party, support hours, data processing terms, feature availability, and all local implementation work in one written offer before comparing it with Australian products.
SolarHub CRM's official pricing structured data labels its prices AUD. The free tier lists 25 solar or battery quotes, five designs monthly, 500 stored leads, and three users. Standard is A$29 monthly or A$26 per month on annual billing, Premium is A$49 or A$44, and Pro is A$199 or A$180. Included tokens, designs, lead-source connections, users, and support vary. Confirm GST, token consumption, add-ons, annual commitment, data export, and the exact compliance tools required by your process.
SolarPlus labels its subscription prices in USD. Annual prepay starts at US$135 per month for Starter, US$260 for Pro, and US$450 for Complete. Monthly prices are US$150, US$300, and US$520. The page says Australian customer costs exclude GST and shows GST-inclusive totals at checkout. Local onboarding packages are A$500 and A$1,000. Pylon displays $4 per Standard project, $10 per Pro project, and CRM from $49 per user per month, but the captured page does not label that subscription currency. Confirm it before publishing a budget.
Solar Proof lists pay-as-you-go access at $4 per project and Pro from $99 per month, with five free projects and a stated 20 percent annual saving. Confirm its currency and GST. OpenSolar says its core professional platform remains free, while premium imagery, API, connectors, payments, finance, or partner services can add cost. Simpro uses tailored pricing and says an initial setup fee varies with onboarding, training, migration, and customization. Zoho offers a free edition for three users and an AUD price selector, but its amounts load dynamically, so obtain a live Australian quote.
Build 12-month and 24-month totals using two realistic volumes. Include an ordinary year and a growth year with more users, battery work, design projects, imagery, messages, signatures, payment volume, documents, and storage. Add the internal owner who manages product catalogues, tariff assumptions, STC rule changes, access, duplicates, automations, and failed integrations. Place that number beside one measured bottleneck such as lead response, proposal turnaround, revision errors, missing compliance evidence, delayed grid approval, or slow invoicing.
Our number-one pick
Quickest ranks first because this comparison gives the most weight to proposal-first value and adoption. Many small solar teams do not fail because a software catalogue lacks one more enterprise feature. They fail when enquiries sit unassigned, proposals take too long, versions look inconsistent, and follow-up remains in personal notes. Quickest presents a narrow path from lead capture to branded solar proposal, follow-up, and pipeline visibility. Its free plan gives one user enough proposal volume to test whether that operating habit changes before a larger commitment.
That logic supports a first trial, not an unconditional Australian rollout. Quickest's verified public pages describe an India-first product with INR pricing, Indian GST treatment, PM Surya Ghar subsidy logic, DISCOM-related workflows, Indian solar assumptions, India-focused lead sources, WhatsApp usage, and Mumbai hosting. We found no public proof for AUD quotes, Australian GST, CER or SAA records, solar and battery STCs, CEC approved products, NMI or DNSP fields, feed-in and export limits, local tariff data, five-year compliance retention, Xero or MYOB, Australian hosting, or local support hours.
An Australian acceptance test should use actual company documents. Create a solar quote and battery quote in AUD, calculate the correct incentive outside the software, and compare every value. Revise the equipment and installation date. Assign an appropriately accredited designer and installer. Record approved components, NMI, distributor, requested and approved export, customer disclosures, accepted documents, written statements, and installation evidence. Export the complete job, including original image metadata, and confirm how long it remains available. Every missing local field should have a documented process owner rather than an assumption.
Commercial and privacy checks matter before customer data enters the system. QuickEstimate should provide the Australian contract party and price, GST handling, payment method, service levels, support time zone, data processing terms, storage and access locations, subprocessor list, backup and incident information, retention and deletion controls, and export format. The buyer should also confirm whether Australian email, SMS, calling, accounting, payment, lead-source, design, and STC partners are supported. Put successful acceptance criteria and any promised delivery date in the order form.
SolarPlus is the stronger documented choice when the buyer wants Australian design, tariff modelling, compliance workflow, handover, and Xero close to the CRM. SolarHub CRM offers a lower published AUD entry point. Pylon and OpenSolar suit design-led teams, while Solar Proof brings clearer Australian proposal and STC evidence. Simpro is stronger for field and job operations, and Zoho for configurable general CRM depth. Quickest should remain number one only for the declared adoption-first question. The best final purchase is the product that passes the local workflow proof with the fewest unsupported handoffs.
Your next move
Start with Quickest and the specialist closest to your largest local requirement. Use the same evidence and test deals for both.
Name the bottleneck. Pick lead response, proposal speed, design, payment, install handoff, or management visibility.
Choose two tools. Compare Quickest with the strongest specialist for that bottleneck.
Run the Three-Deal Proof. Score adoption, repeated entry, revision handling, support, and full annual cost.
Research record
These sources support the market, regulatory, product, and pricing statements on this page. Product terms can change after the checked date.
Common questions
Quickest Solar CRM is our first proposal-focused trial for an Australian team that wants faster mobile proposals, visible lead ownership, and disciplined follow-up. The ranking uses a declared adoption-first lens, and QuickEstimate publishes this page. Quickest's current public evidence is India-first, so it should not receive Australian customer data or replace a local process until AUD, GST, STCs, SAA and CEC records, distributor and export fields, batteries, record retention, integrations, privacy, and support are confirmed in writing and demonstrated. SolarPlus has the strongest documented Australian end-to-end design and compliance workflow among the products checked. SolarHub CRM offers a low published AUD entry point. Pylon and OpenSolar fit design-led sellers, Solar Proof fits compliance-ready proposals, Simpro fits field operations, and Zoho fits configurable sales and marketing. The right purchase depends on the most costly broken handoff.
Quickest has a documented solar sales workflow around leads, mobile proposals, follow-up, pipeline visibility, and a free starting plan. Its public product and price pages are built for India. We did not find public evidence that it handles AUD, Australian GST, solar and battery STCs, SAA accreditation classes, CEC approved products, NMI and DNSP records, export limits, local tariffs, battery eligibility, five-year evidence retention, Australian accounting, or local support. An installer should request written answers and run one solar and one battery deal through a complete acceptance test. The test should include a revised quote, accredited-person assignment, component substitution, distributor approval, customer disclosures, accepted documents, geotagged photos, written statements, accounting, and data export. Buy only if the required outputs and contract terms pass.
Public entry prices range from free plans to several hundred dollars per month, but the tools cover different jobs. SolarHub CRM publishes a free tier and paid AUD plans from A$29 per month. SolarPlus starts at US$135 per month on annual prepay and separately lists Australian onboarding packages. Pylon lists design at $4 or $10 per project and CRM from $49 per user monthly, with currency confirmation required. Solar Proof lists $4 per project or Pro from $99 monthly, again with currency confirmation required. OpenSolar keeps its core platform free while optional services can cost extra. Simpro uses a custom quote and setup fee. Zoho has a free three-user edition and dynamic Australian prices. Quickest publishes Indian prices. Add GST, users, volume, onboarding, migration, imagery, e-signature, SMS, payments, integrations, API access, support, storage, and internal administration.
Some solar tools document STC support, but the buyer must test the current rule and commercial assumptions. Solar Proof says it calculates solar and battery STCs, and OpenSolar's release notes mention Greenbank STC job submission improvements. The checked public pages for Quickest, SolarHub CRM, Pylon, Simpro, and Zoho did not prove native current STC calculation or submission. The Clean Energy Regulator says certificate quantity depends on geography, installation date, eligible generation or displacement, and battery usable capacity. A useful workflow preserves the input date, postcode or zone, equipment, certificate count, assumed certificate value, customer assignment, claim status, and rule version. Recalculate a quote after changing the installation date and battery capacity, then compare the result with the authoritative process. Software can support the claim, but the retailer and accredited installer remain responsible for correct evidence and eligibility.
Start with customer, site, NMI, retailer, distributor or DNSP, proposed and approved export, connection reference, system size, module, inverter, battery, nominal and usable storage capacity, SAA designer and installer details, licence and accreditation class, approved-product evidence, STC inputs and status, feed-in tariff assumption, expected performance, savings and payback assumptions, quote and contract versions, signatures, conflicts, written statements, installation stages, geotagged photos, commissioning, handover, warranty, complaints, invoices, and payments. Record owners and dates for each stage. The Clean Energy Regulator requires retailers to provide specified written information and retain required records for at least five years. The software does not need to submit every item directly, but it should show where the authoritative record lives, who owns the next action, and whether evidence is missing.
No. Software can guide a process, require fields, preserve approved templates, restrict changes, and keep evidence, but responsibility remains with the retailer, designer, installer, and other scheme participants. The Clean Energy Regulator describes accreditation, approved products, installation, disclosure, written statement, photograph, and retention requirements. The New Energy Tech Consumer Code covers conduct across marketing, quotes, contracts, delivery, warranties, and complaints. A template labelled compliant can still contain wrong equipment, stale incentive assumptions, unsupported export income, or an unsuitable battery. Compare generated outputs with current authoritative guidance, review permissions and training, assign named owners, and test exceptions. Obtain professional advice where the company needs a legal or regulatory interpretation.
OpenSolar says its core professional platform is free, funded by partners. The core product documents solar design, proposals, CRM and project work, roles, e-signature, and payments. Free core access does not mean every possible workflow costs zero. Premium imagery, API access, supported connectors, payments, finance, hardware, or partner services may have separate prices or transaction costs. Its 2026 releases show specific Australian work, including an Australia and New Zealand imagery marketplace, a mounting bill-of-materials calculator, accounting updates, and Greenbank STC submission improvements. List every external system and paid service needed before calculating total cost. A small team working largely inside OpenSolar may keep costs low. A company synchronising several systems should obtain current API, connector, support, and transaction terms.
Choose a solar-specific product when system design, tariff and battery modelling, proposals, STCs, approved components, distributor approvals, field evidence, and handover define the workflow. Choose Zoho when the company places more weight on general lead capture, several pipelines, approvals, marketing, portals, APIs, and configurable reporting, and has someone to own implementation. Zoho can store custom solar fields, but storage is not the same as current calculations, approved documents, or direct scheme integration. Many larger businesses use a general CRM as the commercial front office and connect specialist design and operations products. Test the full accepted-deal handoff, component and price revisions, duplicate control, failed synchronisation, reporting, and exit export. Include administrator and integration costs when comparing the configured stack with a vertical platform.
Use three real or carefully redacted jobs. The first is a normal residential solar lead from capture through accepted proposal and installation handoff. The second is a battery project with tariff data, nominal and usable capacity, STC assumptions, VPP capability, and an existing solar system. The third recreates a failure such as a duplicate lead, changed export limit, expired accreditation, substituted inverter, missing photograph, rejected certificate claim, or unpaid invoice. Give the test to sales, design, operations, field, finance, and a manager. Record elapsed time, repeated entry, stale documents, permission gaps, mobile problems, missing metadata, and support response. Verify price, minimum term, setup, data terms, integrations, backup, export, and deletion. Select the product that resolves the expensive handoff with evidence, even if another has a longer feature list.
Use the Three-Deal Proof and require every vendor to show the same lead, revision, document, and failed handoff.