Skip to main content
Documentation-based comparison · the United Kingdom

8 best solar CRM platforms in the United Kingdom

Quickest Solar CRM ranks first under our proposal-first value and adoption lens. This guide also shows where its UK localisation still needs proof, then compares seven alternatives across MCS records, G98 and G99 handoffs, SEG, design, scheduling, pricing, and UK GDPR procurement.

Reviewed 6 September 2026 Reviewed by Parth Maru 34-minute read 23 checked sources

Which solar CRM is best in the United Kingdom?

Quickest Solar CRM is our number-one proposal-first choice for UK solar teams that value fast mobile quoting, a focused pipeline, and a low-friction starting point. Its public product is India-first, however, so a UK buyer must verify GBP and VAT logic, MCS records, DNO and SEG workflows, RECC process support, and UK GDPR transfer terms. Payaca is the strongest alternative when verified UK compliance and end-to-end installation operations matter more than the fastest path to a proposal.

The best solar CRM by use case

A useful shortlist starts with the sales or delivery bottleneck. Each winner below reflects a different buying priority, while the overall ranking rewards a CRM that a solar sales team can adopt quickly.

01Best proposal-first valueQuickest Solar CRM

UK solar sales teams testing fast mobile proposals and disciplined follow-up

Indian public pricing. Pro requires at least three users. Confirm UK commercial terms.
02Best verified UK operationsPayaca

Growing clean-tech installers replacing separate CRM, job, compliance, and field tools

Growth includes 25 users; £1,500 onboarding. Eligible Accelerator plans cost less for 12 months.
03Best design plus optional CRMPylon

Solar companies that want pay-per-project design, proposals, and a connected CRM add-on

Standard and Pro design projects are pay as you go. CRM is a separate monthly add-on.
04Best installation-company ERPBusiness Pilot

Installation businesses that need post-sale scheduling, process control, documents, finance, and field visibility

Equivalent to three full users, with a public 24-month minimum subscription term.
05Best for small trade teamsTradify

Installers that want enquiries, quotes, scheduling, jobs, invoices, payments, and mobile work

Lite, Pro, and Plus public prices. Fourteen-day trial; some SMS and website features cost extra.
06Best free core design platformOpenSolar

Solar teams prioritising system design, proposals, and project work inside a free core platform

API Access and supported third-party connectors became chargeable from 16 April 2026.
07Best for lead qualificationVoltflo

UK and Irish installers focused on self-qualified leads, quick proposals, booking, and marketing attribution

The official page says pricing is tailored to business size and needs.
08Best generic marketing CRMHubSpot

Marketing-led teams willing to configure solar stages and connect specialist design and operations tools

Official global catalogue price. Obtain current UK GBP pricing and tax from checkout or sales.

The UK Solar CRM Fit Test

We read the live UK search results, checked official product and pricing pages, and compared each platform with a real British installer journey. The overall order gives extra weight to how quickly a sales team can adopt the CRM, issue a clear proposal, and maintain follow-up. UK compliance and delivery depth are reported separately and can change the right choice for a specific installer. No product receives a numeric score because public documentation cannot show day-to-day usability with enough precision.

01

Solar workflow depth

Can the product carry system details, proposal status, project milestones, and the delivery handoff without rebuilding the process in custom fields?

02

Sales control

Can managers route leads, track activity, automate follow-up, forecast revenue, and see why an opportunity stalled?

03

Proposal and design

Can a rep move from site information to a credible customer proposal, and how much specialist solar design happens inside the platform?

04

Local transaction fit

Does the workflow support the language, currency, tax, communications, documents, and handoffs common in the United Kingdom?

05

Cost to adoption

What setup, migration, training, administration, and extra software does the apparent subscription require?

Evidence standard. This edition uses public product, pricing, regulatory, and market sources checked on 6 September 2026. A listed capability may depend on plan or configuration. We did not conduct hands-on tests, so we do not publish numerical product scores.

Compare the 8 best solar CRM platforms in UK

The table separates CRM depth from proposal, design, and operations coverage. Confirm plan limits and country availability in writing before signing.

01
Quickest Solar CRMBest proposal-first value
Best for
UK solar sales teams testing fast mobile proposals and disciplined follow-up
Public price
Free; Pro ₹6,999/user/year
Proposal
Core strength; UK outputs require validation
Design
Proposal and pricing layer, not documented as full UK PV design
Operations
Lead and pipeline workflow
CRM depth
Focused solar sales CRM
Read full review
02
PayacaBest verified UK operations
Best for
Growing clean-tech installers replacing separate CRM, job, compliance, and field tools
Public price
Growth from £999/month annually
Proposal
Interactive proposals and e-signatures
Design
Imports from OpenSolar, EasyPV, and HeatPunk
Operations
Broad scheduling, field, finance, and compliance
CRM depth
Purpose-built clean-tech CRM
Read full review
03
PylonBest design plus optional CRM
Best for
Solar companies that want pay-per-project design, proposals, and a connected CRM add-on
Public price
£4 or £10/project; CRM from £49/user/month
Proposal
Web and PDF proposals with e-signature options
Design
Strong solar and battery design focus
Operations
Project records and installer outputs
CRM depth
Optional solar CRM add-on
Read full review
04
Business PilotBest installation-company ERP
Best for
Installation businesses that need post-sale scheduling, process control, documents, finance, and field visibility
Public price
Minimum £240/month
Proposal
Stores quotes; not a pricing system
Design
Connects to separate pricing or design tools
Operations
Deep installation scheduling and status control
CRM depth
CRM plus installer ERP functions
Read full review
05
TradifyBest for small trade teams
Best for
Installers that want enquiries, quotes, scheduling, jobs, invoices, payments, and mobile work
Public price
£34 to £44/user/month
Proposal
Branded quotes and automatic reminders
Design
No specialist PV design verified
Operations
Strong job, schedule, invoice, and payment flow
CRM depth
Practical trade customer management
Read full review
06
OpenSolarBest free core design platform
Best for
Solar teams prioritising system design, proposals, and project work inside a free core platform
Public price
Core platform free
Proposal
Solar-specific customer proposals
Design
Core product strength
Operations
Project workflow inside OpenSolar
CRM depth
Useful internal workflow; assess advanced sales needs
Read full review
07
VoltfloBest for lead qualification
Best for
UK and Irish installers focused on self-qualified leads, quick proposals, booking, and marketing attribution
Public price
Custom quote
Proposal
Instant branded solar proposals
Design
Works alongside specialist design products
Operations
Sales-focused rather than full field operations
CRM depth
Solar pipeline and attribution
Read full review
08
HubSpotBest generic marketing CRM
Best for
Marketing-led teams willing to configure solar stages and connect specialist design and operations tools
Public price
Free tools; paid from US$20/seat/month
Proposal
Generic quoting and integrations by plan
Design
Requires a specialist solar tool
Operations
Needs configuration and integrations
CRM depth
Deep general sales and marketing CRM
Read full review

Local billing check: confirm GBP pricing, tax treatment, contract currency, and payment fees in writing.

PlatformBest forPublic priceSolar proposalsDesignProject operationsCRM depthFree access
1Quickest Solar CRMUK solar sales teams testing fast mobile proposals and disciplined follow-upFree; Pro ₹6,999/user/yearCore strength; UK outputs require validationProposal and pricing layer, not documented as full UK PV designLead and pipeline workflowFocused solar sales CRM10 proposals/month for one user
2PayacaGrowing clean-tech installers replacing separate CRM, job, compliance, and field toolsGrowth from £999/month annuallyInteractive proposals and e-signaturesImports from OpenSolar, EasyPV, and HeatPunkBroad scheduling, field, finance, and compliancePurpose-built clean-tech CRMDemo; no public permanent free plan found
3PylonSolar companies that want pay-per-project design, proposals, and a connected CRM add-on£4 or £10/project; CRM from £49/user/monthWeb and PDF proposals with e-signature optionsStrong solar and battery design focusProject records and installer outputsOptional solar CRM add-onFive Standard project credits
4Business PilotInstallation businesses that need post-sale scheduling, process control, documents, finance, and field visibilityMinimum £240/monthStores quotes; not a pricing systemConnects to separate pricing or design toolsDeep installation scheduling and status controlCRM plus installer ERP functionsFree trial available
5TradifyInstallers that want enquiries, quotes, scheduling, jobs, invoices, payments, and mobile work£34 to £44/user/monthBranded quotes and automatic remindersNo specialist PV design verifiedStrong job, schedule, invoice, and payment flowPractical trade customer managementFourteen-day trial
6OpenSolarSolar teams prioritising system design, proposals, and project work inside a free core platformCore platform freeSolar-specific customer proposalsCore product strengthProject workflow inside OpenSolarUseful internal workflow; assess advanced sales needsCore app remains free
7VoltfloUK and Irish installers focused on self-qualified leads, quick proposals, booking, and marketing attributionCustom quoteInstant branded solar proposalsWorks alongside specialist design productsSales-focused rather than full field operationsSolar pipeline and attributionDemo; no public permanent free plan found
8HubSpotMarketing-led teams willing to configure solar stages and connect specialist design and operations toolsFree tools; paid from US$20/seat/monthGeneric quoting and integrations by planRequires a specialist solar toolNeeds configuration and integrationsDeep general sales and marketing CRMFree CRM tools

Pricing and capability labels were checked against official sources on 6 September 2026. Currency conversion is intentionally omitted where a vendor does not publish a local price.

The UK solar CRM decision starts after the quote

A British residential solar sale moves through survey data, system design, consumer information, grid connection, commissioning, certification, export setup, payment, and aftercare. A CRM is useful only when it keeps the commercial and operational record connected. The evidence below explains why local workflow proof matters more than a long generic feature list.

01

MCS reported 267,032 certified rooftop solar installations during 2025, 31 percent above the previous annual record set in 2011. The same release counted 369,000 certified small-scale renewable installations across solar, heat pumps, and batteries in 2025. That volume increases the cost of copying customer, property, design, and handover details between disconnected tools. A CRM cannot install a system, but it can make ownership, deadlines, and missing records visible before they become customer problems.

MCS: UK homes installed a small-scale renewable every 90 seconds ↗
02

MCS says certified installers follow its Installation Standards and use products assessed under Product Standards. Its library includes the Solar PV Installation Standard, contractor requirements, and customer commitment material. This makes document control a buying requirement. Ask a CRM vendor to show how proposal versions, design files, commissioning evidence, warranty documents, and certificate references stay attached to one job. A statement that a product serves MCS installers is not proof that it creates compliant records.

MCS: Standards and Tools Library ↗
03

Every electricity-generating installation must reach the relevant Distribution Network Operator. MCS guidance says a G98 solar installation below 16 amps per phase is notified within 28 days after commissioning. Where G99 applies above 16 amps per phase, prior permission to connect is required. The CRM should record the DNO, capacity, inverter, application route, form version, approval reference, deadline, and responsible person. Direct submission should be claimed only when the vendor documents it.

MCS: Notifying DNOs, including G98 and G99 ↗
04

The Smart Export Guarantee is not one universal tariff. Ofgem says an eligible generator applies to a SEG licensee, and each licensee sets its application process, payment amount, and contract length. A practical handover record therefore needs the MCS certificate status, export meter information, chosen supplier, customer documents, and follow-up date. Hard-coding one headline export rate can create a misleading proposal when supplier terms change.

Ofgem: Smart Export Guarantee guidance for generators ↗
05

HMRC's current notice says qualifying installations of energy-saving materials are zero-rated through 31 March 2027. The published position returns them to the reduced 5 percent rate from 1 April 2027. Solar panels and batteries appear in the detailed scope. A UK quote tool should handle pounds, tax-inclusive and tax-exclusive totals, deposits, variations, and the tax point. It should also preserve which rate was used when an old proposal is revised after a rule change.

HM Revenue and Customs: Energy-saving materials and heating equipment, VAT Notice 708/6 ↗
06

Customer names, addresses, meter details, energy data, photographs, signatures, and finance notes can all sit in a solar CRM. The ICO says processor contracts need terms covering documented instructions, confidentiality, security, subprocessors, individual rights, deletion or return, and audits. For an overseas platform, ask where information is stored and accessed, which transfer mechanism applies, and how a full export works. A hosting-region statement by itself is not a complete UK GDPR answer.

Information Commissioner's Office: What a controller and processor contract must include ↗

Why each solar CRM earns its place

Each review explains the useful workflow, the buyer who should shortlist it, and the country-specific question that a sales demo must answer.

02
P
Best verified UK operations

Payaca

Payaca UK ↗

Payaca has the strongest publicly documented UK compliance and end-to-end installation workflow in this shortlist, with a price and implementation model aimed at teams running their operation on it.

Best forScaled UK clean-tech opsGrowth annual£999/monthIncluded users25 on GrowthOnboarding£1,500 one-off

Payaca presents itself as an operating system for UK solar, heat-pump, battery, and EV-charger installers. Its public feature pages cover lead and pipeline management, interactive multi-option proposals, e-signatures, surveys, scheduling, field work, job forms, invoices, online payments, accounting sync, reporting, customer portals, service plans, MCS documentation, and DNO applications through ENA Connect. It also lists design imports from OpenSolar, EasyPV, and HeatPunk. That gives a buyer specific handoffs to test instead of relying on a general claim that the software understands solar.

The standard Growth plan is published at £1,199 per month or £999 per month when billed annually, with 25 users included and extra users at £30 per seat up to 50. Payaca also lists a one-off £1,500 onboarding fee for workflow mapping, migration, and training. Its Accelerator starts at £299 per month, or £249 per month annually, for 12 months. Public eligibility includes eight or fewer employees and incorporation within the previous 24 months. That introductory plan later returns to standard Growth pricing, so model both years.

The breadth is valuable when several tools and spreadsheets already create repeated entry. It also means the implementation deserves scrutiny. Bring the current pipeline, document templates, MCS process, ENA Connect case, design handoff, invoice structure, permissions, and reports to the demonstration. Ask which automations and AI allowances belong to each plan, how SMS at the published 4p per message is billed, and what data can be exported. Payaca is our second overall pick only because the declared ranking lens favours a cheaper, focused proposal adoption test. On publicly verified UK depth, Payaca leads.

Why shortlist it
  • Publicly documented MCS documentation and ENA Connect DNO workflow
  • Connects sales, scheduling, field work, finance, and customer handover
  • Imports from common clean-tech design tools
  • Published team sizes, onboarding price, and core plan prices
Check before buying
  • Model the post-Accelerator price and at least two years of total cost
  • Confirm automation, AI, SMS, payment, and extra-seat limits
  • Test the exact MCS and DNO outputs used by your certification body and DNO
  • Inspect migration scope, export format, and implementation timetable

Choose it if: your growing UK team wants one operational record from lead through installation, MCS and DNO work, finance, and handover. Choose another platform if: you mainly need an inexpensive proposal and follow-up tool, or you want to keep design and job operations in separate specialist products.

03
PY
Best design plus optional CRM

Pylon

Pylon UK pricing ↗

Pylon is the clearest shortlist choice when the sales problem begins with solar and battery design rather than with generic contact management.

Standard project£4Pro project£10CRM add-onFrom £49/user/monthTrialFive Standard projects

Pylon combines pay-per-project solar design with customer proposals and an optional CRM. Its UK pricing page lists a Standard project at £4 and a Pro project at £10, with no monthly minimum spend. Standard includes system design, imagery, financial projections, web and PDF proposals, and battery design. Pro adds capabilities for custom load profiles and larger commercial work. This structure can fit a small installer whose design volume changes from month to month and who does not want a design seat subscription before work arrives.

The Solar CRM add-on starts at £49 per user per month. Public features include project links, email sync, automatic lead processing, SMS, web forms, AI assistance, custom pipelines, sequences, reminders, team work, lead history, and reporting. The connection between system design and the sales record is the main attraction. It reduces the risk that a rep discusses one system while the designer and proposal show another. Buyers should still test how revisions propagate and which data remains structured after acceptance.

The checked pages did not prove a complete MCS document pack, G98 or G99 submission, SEG handover, RECC evidence, or UK accounting workflow. Ask Pylon to demonstrate each requirement that matters rather than assuming a UK URL covers it. Also calculate project credits, CRM users, e-signatures, SMS, payment fees, imagery, API access, and support. Pylon deserves third place because design and proposal work sit close to the CRM, while the price model stays visible enough for a small team to estimate.

Why shortlist it
  • Solar and battery design sits close to the customer proposal
  • Published pay-per-project UK pricing with no monthly design minimum
  • Optional CRM covers leads, communication, tasks, and reporting
  • Trial includes five Standard project credits
Check before buying
  • Verify MCS documents, DNO tasks, SEG handover, and RECC evidence
  • Calculate CRM, project, e-signature, SMS, payment, imagery, and API costs
  • Test design revisions and structured data sync into the CRM
  • Confirm export formats and accounting integrations

Choose it if: your team wants solar design, battery scenarios, customer proposals, and CRM records in a closely connected workflow with pay-per-project design pricing. Choose another platform if: you need proven end-to-end UK compliance operations or a deep marketing automation platform more than integrated solar design.

04
BP
Best installation-company ERP

Business Pilot

Business Pilot solar CRM ↗

Business Pilot is strongest when an installation company has outgrown a sales-only CRM and needs every won contract to move through a controlled operational process.

Minimum price£240/monthMinimum term24 monthsData hosting claimUK Microsoft AzureFree accessTrial

Business Pilot is a UK CRM and enterprise resource planning product built around installation companies. Its solar page covers website lead capture, contact and contract records, sales reporting, mobile field access, interactive scheduling, status progression, documents, remedials, service calls, guarantees, financial reporting, and accounting exports. A manager can map the company's process and see where a lead or contract is stuck. Surveyors and installers can receive jobs and approved documents in the app, which addresses the handoff that sales-only CRMs often leave to email and shared folders.

The vendor is clear about a boundary: Business Pilot is not pricing software. It stores quote documents and connects with pricing tools. That honesty helps a solar buyer plan the stack. The public FAQ says there is no minimum user count but a minimum contract value of £240 per month, equivalent to three full users. It also states a 24-month minimum term, a monthly rolling arrangement after the subscription period, unlimited file storage, and UK data storage on Microsoft Azure. Verify current contract wording in the formal quote.

The checked product pages did not prove native solar design, MCS document generation, DNO submission, or SEG workflow. Business Pilot can still hold tasks and documents around those processes, but the distinction affects labour and error risk. Ask a salesperson to configure one live solar status map and show the exact file, field, reminder, and owner at each step. The platform earns fourth place for broad installation control. A business that only wants faster proposals may find it larger than necessary, while a company losing margin after acceptance should take it seriously.

Why shortlist it
  • Built around installation-company contracts and delivery stages
  • Strong scheduling, status progression, documents, and mobile field access
  • Public contract minimum and data-hosting information
  • Finance reporting and exports support post-sale control
Check before buying
  • Budget for a separate solar design and pricing layer
  • Verify native MCS, G98, G99, SEG, and RECC support
  • Review the 24-month term, onboarding, user types, and notice period
  • Test integrations and a complete attachment export

Choose it if: won jobs disappear into scheduling, purchasing, document, field, remedial, and finance gaps, and your company wants an installer-focused operating record. Choose another platform if: the main need is solar design or a lightweight proposal-first CRM with a short commitment.

05
T
Best for small trade teams

Tradify

Tradify solar CRM ↗

Tradify offers a practical bridge from enquiry to paid job for a small trade-led installer, but specialist solar design and UK solar compliance still need separate proof or tools.

Lite£34/user/monthPro£37/user/monthPlus£44/user/monthTrial14 days

Tradify starts with the daily work of a trade business. The UK solar page describes enquiry capture, contact records, draft and branded quotes, accepted-quote conversion into a job or invoice, scheduling, job tracking, invoicing, payments, and automatic email or SMS reminders. Web and mobile access gives sales and field users a shared record. It also lists connections with Xero, Sage, and QuickBooks Online. For a small contractor moving from a diary, accounting package, inbox, and spreadsheet, that is a coherent improvement without enterprise CRM administration.

Public UK prices are £34 per user per month for Lite, £37 for Pro, and £44 for Plus. Tradify offers a 14-day trial and says subscriptions are month-to-month. The pricing page shows optional charges for its Instant Website and certain text messages, including quotes, invoices, and reminders. Check the exact plan because capabilities such as forms, certificates, job costing, purchase orders, subcontractor scheduling, and reporting differ. Calculate full field-user and SMS volume, not only the owner or office licence.

Tradify mentions compliance certificates, but the checked pages did not establish an MCS Solar PV document pack, G98 or G99 submission, SEG handover, or a complete RECC process. It also does not present itself as a specialist PV design engine. A UK solar buyer should attach the design output and run its actual commissioning and handover checklist during the trial. Tradify earns fifth place because it handles the commercial and job basics clearly at an approachable public price. Teams with complex certification and DNO work may need a specialist layer.

Why shortlist it
  • Clear enquiry, quotation, job, invoice, and payment flow
  • Desktop and mobile access for office and field teams
  • Published UK monthly prices and 14-day trial
  • Connections with common UK accounting products
Check before buying
  • Verify which plan includes the required forms, certificates, and reports
  • Add SMS, website, payment, and every field-user cost
  • Demonstrate MCS, DNO, SEG, and RECC evidence handling
  • Plan a separate specialist solar design workflow

Choose it if: your small installation team mainly needs to turn enquiries into scheduled, documented, invoiced, and paid jobs with simple mobile access. Choose another platform if: you need detailed PV design, deep marketing automation, or proven MCS and DNO submission in the same product.

06
OS
Best free core design platform

OpenSolar

OpenSolar ↗

OpenSolar remains an unusually accessible design and proposal choice, but its ability to replace a dedicated CRM depends on the depth of the sales, compliance, and external data workflow.

Core appFreeAPI changePaid from 16 Apr 2026ConnectorsSeparately chargeableBest forSolar design and proposals

OpenSolar is built around solar professionals designing, selling, and managing projects. The core application covers more of a solar seller's work than a generic CRM because the system model, equipment, customer presentation, and project live together. A small company may decide that its internal project workflow provides enough customer management. A larger sales operation may still need advanced routing, sequences, attribution, permissions, service records, or management reporting in another CRM. The correct answer depends on process depth, not whether a page uses the CRM label.

OpenSolar confirmed that the core app remains free for work completed inside the platform. Its 2026 announcement introduced paid API Access and paid supported connectors for data moving to or from third-party systems. Charges began on 16 April 2026. The announcement does not provide one universal price, so buyers should obtain the current cost for their exact CRM, accounting, operations, and reporting connections. A free design platform can still be part of a paid multi-product stack once those handoffs are required.

For UK use, run an ordinary design and a battery case, then revise consumption, components, system size, price, and VAT. Inspect the customer output and exported data. Ask specifically about the current MCS document set, DNO application or task workflow, SEG handover, RECC records, and accounting integration. Do not assume that solar-specific design equals complete UK compliance operations. OpenSolar ranks sixth because its free core removes a major adoption barrier and its design role is clear, while this comparison gives more weight to dedicated CRM follow-up and connected delivery control.

Why shortlist it
  • Free core platform for work kept inside OpenSolar
  • Solar design, equipment, project, and proposal information stay close
  • Can cover much of a simple solar sales workflow
  • Useful specialist companion to a dedicated CRM or operations product
Check before buying
  • Obtain current API Access and connector prices for the planned stack
  • Verify MCS, DNO, SEG, RECC, and UK VAT outputs
  • Test advanced lead routing, sequences, permissions, and reporting needs
  • Inspect revision behaviour and complete project exports

Choose it if: solar design and customer proposals are the centre of your process and the team can work largely inside OpenSolar. Choose another platform if: you need a deeper sales CRM, field scheduling, or documented UK compliance operation with less integration work.

07
V
Best for lead qualification

Voltflo

Voltflo ↗

Voltflo is a focused option for an installer that wants its website, lead qualification, proposal, booking, pipeline, and marketing source tied together.

MarketUK and IrelandPriceCustom quoteCore strengthLead qualificationIntegrations listedGHL, HubSpot, Zoho, Monday

Voltflo focuses on the top half of a solar installer's customer journey. Its public page describes dynamic self-qualifying enquiry flows, residential and commercial lead capture, instant proposals built from the installer's equipment and prices, automated booking, pipeline management, marketing-source tracking, and Smart Sites. This combination can help a marketing-led company distinguish which campaigns produce booked and won work rather than counting form fills. It also lists native connections with GoHighLevel, HubSpot, Zoho, and Monday for companies keeping another CRM.

The vendor says all plans include its complete feature set and that pricing is tailored to company size and needs. There is no public list price on the checked page. Ask for setup, website, migration, user, messaging, automation, integration, support, and contract costs in one written quote. Voltflo also says customers typically save more than 12 admin hours per week. That is a vendor claim, so we would not use it in a business case until a customer reference and an internal time study support it.

Voltflo markets to MCS-certified installers, but the checked page did not prove native MCS packs, G98 or G99 submission, SEG handover, field scheduling, or financial operations. Its value may be to connect lead generation and sales conversion, then pass accepted work to a separate design and delivery system. Test the exact handoff and how revisions return. Voltflo ranks seventh because the main comparison lens also rewards transparent entry cost and broader CRM control, but it can outrank several products for a UK installer whose largest problem is lead quality and attribution.

Why shortlist it
  • Explicit focus on UK and Irish solar installation companies
  • Connects lead qualification, proposals, booking, pipeline, and attribution
  • Supports residential and commercial enquiry flows
  • Can sit alongside several established general CRMs
Check before buying
  • Request complete pricing, setup, integration, messaging, and contract terms
  • Treat time-saving figures as vendor claims until independently supported
  • Verify MCS, DNO, SEG, RECC, and field-operations depth
  • Test accepted-deal and revised-design handoffs to downstream tools

Choose it if: paid lead quality, rapid qualification, proposal response, booking, and marketing attribution are the commercial bottlenecks. Choose another platform if: you need public pricing, detailed solar design, or one proven platform for compliance, installation, and finance.

08
H
Best generic marketing CRM

HubSpot

HubSpot Sales pricing ↗

HubSpot is the safest generic shortlist for a marketing-led team, provided the company accepts that UK solar design, grid, compliance, and field operations need configuration or connected products.

Free accessCRM toolsStarter catalogueFrom US$20/seat/monthProfessionalFrom US$100/seat/monthSolar depthConfigured, not native

HubSpot provides mature contact, company, deal, email, meeting, form, marketing, reporting, and integration functions. A solar company can create a deal pipeline, route enquiries, log communication, manage campaigns, and connect web conversion to revenue. The ecosystem makes it easier to find implementation help and connect specialist tools. For an installer with a marketing team and clear system ownership, that flexibility can outweigh the convenience of a smaller vertical CRM. It can also preserve a familiar front office while a design or operations product handles technical work.

The official global product catalogue checked for this review lists Sales Hub Starter from US$20 per seat per month, Professional from US$100 per seat per month with US$1,500 onboarding, and Enterprise from US$150 per seat per month billed annually. HubSpot's interactive pricing can vary by market, package, seat type, and purchase date. A UK buyer should obtain the current GBP total, VAT treatment, onboarding, additional contacts, communication limits, and required integrations in writing rather than converting the catalogue price.

We found no native solar design, MCS document, G98 or G99 submission, SEG handover, or RECC workflow on the checked sales pricing material. Those processes need custom properties, workflows, documents, integrations, or another platform. Build a proof using one complete UK solar job and estimate the administrator time needed to maintain it. HubSpot ranks eighth because it requires the most solar configuration in this shortlist. It remains a credible choice when marketing automation and general CRM depth are more valuable than an installer-specific workflow out of the box.

Why shortlist it
  • Broad sales, marketing, forms, email, reporting, and integration ecosystem
  • Free CRM tools provide a low-cost starting point
  • Flexible pipelines and data model can support a designed solar process
  • Suitable for organisations with dedicated marketing and CRM ownership
Check before buying
  • Obtain live GBP, VAT, onboarding, contact, and seat pricing
  • Budget the implementation and ongoing CRM administration
  • Map every design, MCS, DNO, SEG, field, and finance integration
  • Test data sync, duplicate control, attachment handling, and exit export

Choose it if: your company has a strong marketing function, values a broad CRM ecosystem, and can own configuration and integrations. Choose another platform if: a small team needs solar design, proposals, installation tasks, or UK compliance records with less system building.

How should a UK solar company choose a CRM?

Choose by the most expensive broken handoff, then test that handoff using real opportunities, real users, and the documents your customers actually receive.

Solo or two-person installerStart with Quickest and OpenSolar or Pylon

Use Quickest to test mobile lead, proposal, and follow-up adoption. Pair it with a design platform when system modelling is the bottleneck. Before using Quickest with customers, verify GBP, VAT, UK documents, data terms, and support. Pylon offers another path when pay-per-project solar design and an optional CRM fit the workload better.

Growing residential teamCompare Quickest with Payaca

Quickest offers the tighter proposal-first adoption test. Payaca publicly documents a much broader UK operations layer, including MCS documentation and DNO applications through ENA Connect. Run the same two jobs in both. The answer depends on whether sales speed or the complete install and compliance handoff causes more costly errors today.

Trade-led installation businessCompare Tradify with Business Pilot

Tradify suits teams that mainly need enquiries, quotations, scheduling, job records, invoices, payments, and mobile access. Business Pilot goes deeper into installation-company status control, documents, remedials, reporting, and finance. Neither checked page proved the complete MCS, DNO, and SEG workflow, so include those demonstrations in the buying process.

Marketing-led sales teamCompare Voltflo with HubSpot

Voltflo focuses on solar lead qualification, quick proposals, booking, pipeline, and attribution for UK and Irish installers. HubSpot offers a larger generic marketing and sales ecosystem. Choose based on whether your team wants solar structure from the start or has the people and budget to configure a general platform and connect specialist tools.

Design-heavy solar sellerCompare Pylon with OpenSolar

Both put solar design and customer presentation near the centre. Pylon publishes per-project UK prices and offers a paid CRM add-on. OpenSolar keeps its core internal workflow free but now charges for API Access and supported connectors. Test production assumptions, battery cases, proposal revisions, and the data handoff into delivery before choosing.

Multi-team or enterprise operatorCompare Payaca with a configured enterprise CRM

Payaca publishes UK clean-tech workflows and inclusive team sizes at its larger plans. A platform such as Salesforce or HubSpot may suit a company with established CRM administrators, complex marketing, and integration resources. Model implementation, data migration, training, support, security review, and two years of operating cost rather than comparing seat prices alone.

The Three-Deal Proof

Run the same three opportunities in every shortlisted CRM: one ordinary lead, one revision-heavy project, and one deal that already failed. This removes demo theatre and exposes repeated entry, stale documents, weak mobile adoption, and missing local support.

  1. 1
    Run the clean deal

    Capture a real lead, assign it, create the proposal, schedule follow-up, record acceptance, and hand it to delivery.

  2. 2
    Change the assumptions

    Change the system, equipment, price, payment route, and installation date. Identify every stale record.

  3. 3
    Recreate a failure

    Use a duplicate, missed follow-up, rejected proposal, or delayed job and ask the CRM to show what happens next.

10 requirements to verify in the United Kingdom

01

GBP price books and changing VAT rules

Create a quote in pounds, show tax-inclusive and tax-exclusive views, take a deposit, issue a revision, and preserve the original tax treatment. Ask the vendor to demonstrate how the currently published change from zero rating to 5 percent on 1 April 2027 would be configured. Product tax logic should be editable by an authorised administrator and visible in an audit trail.

02

MCS document ownership

List every MCS-related document your team produces, receives, or references. Then ask where the latest version lives, who can approve it, what fields are mandatory, and how it enters the customer handover pack. Do not accept the phrase MCS-ready without seeing the actual output. The installer remains responsible for the installation, certificate, consumer information, and quality process.

03

G98, G99, battery, and DNO stages

Test one G98 job and one project that needs G99 permission before connection. Include a battery case. The CRM should identify the DNO, hold the technical inputs and attachments, assign the next task, record approval or notification, and warn when a deadline is approaching. If a salesperson says the system submits directly, request the supported DNO list and a live demonstration.

04

SEG handover without a fixed tariff assumption

Record the selected SEG licensee, application stage, export meter details, requested documents, and customer follow-up. Supplier terms vary, so the proposal should label its rate and assumptions rather than present a generic number as guaranteed income. The handover should make clear what the installer completed and what the customer must still send to the supplier.

05

RECC and consumer communication records

For domestic sales, test how the system stores quotation versions, pre-contract information, cancellation records, customer approvals, complaints, warranty documents, and insurance-backed guarantee evidence. RECC publishes a consumer code, but software does not make conduct compliant automatically. Your process, permissions, training, and evidence must support the promises made to a household.

06

Design data with one controlled handoff

If design happens in OpenSolar, EasyPV, Pylon, or another platform, check which fields return to the CRM. Test address changes, revised consumption, module substitutions, battery additions, and version numbers. A PDF attachment is helpful, but structured system size, equipment, production, and pricing data often matter later for operations and reporting.

07

UK GDPR processor and transfer terms

Request the data processing agreement, subprocessor list, security overview, retention controls, deletion method, export format, and international transfer safeguards. Confirm how subject access, correction, and erasure requests are handled. Overseas hosting can be lawful with the right safeguards, but a buyer needs the documents and facts to assess its own obligations.

08

Mobile survey and installation evidence

Have a field user open the property record, view design details, complete a task, capture photographs, upload a document, and collect a signature from a phone. Check offline behaviour, upload limits, role permissions, and whether field access needs a full paid licence. A desktop-only workflow often pushes the real evidence back into messaging apps and shared drives.

09

Accounting, payments, and communication cost

Confirm the exact Xero, QuickBooks, or Sage handoff, including customer, invoice, tax, payment, and credit-note fields. Add SMS, payment processing, email volume, connector, API, and phone costs to the annual budget. A cheap CRM can become an expensive stack when quoting, design, e-signature, messaging, and job scheduling are separate subscriptions.

10

Migration, exit, and contract minimums

Import a sample containing duplicate people, two properties for one customer, open proposals, attachments, activity history, and consent records. Then export it again. Confirm setup fees, minimum seats, minimum term, notice period, API access, and attachment export. The ability to leave cleanly is part of a reliable CRM decision, even when the team expects to stay.

Contract rule: A country name on a vendor website does not prove that local billing, documents, integrations, support hours, or regulatory workflows are included in your plan. Put each required capability in the order form.

What does solar CRM software cost in the United Kingdom?

Public pricing ranges from a free core design platform to more than £1,000 per month for an operations system serving a larger team. Those figures buy different things. A fair budget separates CRM seats, solar design projects, onboarding, data migration, messaging, payment processing, connectors, API access, field users, and the internal time needed to configure and maintain the workflow.

Free; Pro ₹6,999/user/yearQuickest Solar CRM

Indian public pricing. Pro requires at least three users. Confirm UK commercial terms.

Growth from £999/month annuallyPayaca

Growth includes 25 users; £1,500 onboarding. Eligible Accelerator plans cost less for 12 months.

£4 or £10/project; CRM from £49/user/monthPylon

Standard and Pro design projects are pay as you go. CRM is a separate monthly add-on.

Minimum £240/monthBusiness Pilot

Equivalent to three full users, with a public 24-month minimum subscription term.

Quickest publishes a free plan with 10 proposals per month for one user and a Pro plan at ₹6,999 per user per year with a three-user minimum. That is Indian pricing, not a quoted UK tariff. Keep the original currency in the comparison and ask QuickEstimate to confirm UK availability, GBP billing, tax treatment, payment method, data terms, and support before relying on a converted figure.

Payaca publishes Growth at £1,199 per month, or £999 per month when billed annually, with 25 users included and a £1,500 onboarding fee. Its Accelerator can cost £299 per month, or £249 per month annually for 12 months, for qualifying young installers. Pylon publishes £4 per Standard design project, £10 per Pro project, and a Solar CRM add-on starting at £49 per user per month.

Business Pilot's public FAQ states a £240 monthly minimum, equivalent to three full users, plus a 24-month minimum subscription term. Tradify lists Lite at £34, Pro at £37, and Plus at £44 per user per month, with additional charges for some SMS and website functions. Voltflo uses tailored pricing. OpenSolar says its core internal platform remains free, while API Access and supported connectors became chargeable from 16 April 2026.

Run a 12-month and 24-month total-cost model. Include VAT where applicable, implementation, imports, custom forms, e-signatures, telephone and SMS use, payment fees, design credits, API or connector charges, extra storage, support, and an internal system owner. Then place the cost beside one measurable bottleneck, such as proposal turnaround, missed lead follow-up, repeated data entry, stalled DNO cases, or delayed invoices.

Why Quickest Solar CRM ranks first in the United Kingdom

Quickest ranks first because this comparison gives the most weight to proposal-first value and adoption. A CRM only creates value when salespeople use it. Quickest presents a focused path from lead to mobile proposal, follow-up, and pipeline visibility, with a public free starting point. That narrower path can be easier to test than a large operations or enterprise platform. It is a defensible first trial for a small or growing solar sales team that wants to change behaviour quickly.

The ranking does not mean Quickest has the deepest verified UK feature set. It does not. The public product and pricing pages describe an India-first system with rupee billing, PM Surya Ghar subsidy logic, DISCOM calculations, WhatsApp workflows, and Mumbai hosting. Those details are useful evidence about the existing product, but they do not prove British VAT, MCS, DNO, SEG, RECC, or UK GDPR transfer support. We would reject a UK rollout that relied on assumptions instead of a documented acceptance test.

Before a UK team uses Quickest with live customers, it should create a GBP quote with the right VAT treatment, revise that quote, attach the design, route one G98 job, track one G99 approval, assemble the required customer records, and complete an MCS and SEG handover checklist. It should also receive the data processing agreement, subprocessor information, hosting and access details, international transfer safeguards, deletion terms, and a usable data export.

Payaca is the stronger choice when the buyer wants UK clean-tech operations already documented by the vendor. Pylon and OpenSolar are stronger starting points when detailed solar design drives the purchase. Business Pilot and Tradify deserve attention when scheduling, field work, invoicing, and post-sale control cause the largest losses. Voltflo and HubSpot fit marketing-led teams in different ways. Ranking Quickest first should start a two-product comparison, not end the procurement process.

The best decision is measurable. Ask three real users to run three real deals during the trial. Record the time from lead capture to sent proposal, every duplicate entry, every stale version, every missing task, and every support question. If Quickest wins that test and the UK checks are documented, it earns the rollout. If it does not, the specialist closest to the failed handoff is the better CRM for that company.

Why it wins
Ranking lensProposal-first value and adoption
Public free access10 proposals per month, one user
Public Pro price₹6,999 per user per year, minimum three
UK statusLocalisation must be verified before rollout

Build a two-product shortlist this week

Start with Quickest and the specialist closest to your largest local requirement. Use the same evidence and test deals for both.

01

Name the bottleneck. Pick lead response, proposal speed, design, payment, install handoff, or management visibility.

02

Choose two tools. Compare Quickest with the strongest specialist for that bottleneck.

03

Run the Three-Deal Proof. Score adoption, repeated entry, revision handling, support, and full annual cost.

Sources checked for this comparison

These sources support the market, regulatory, product, and pricing statements on this page. Product terms can change after the checked date.

  1. UK homes installed a small-scale renewable every 90 secondsMCS · checked 6 Sep 2026
  2. Standards and Tools LibraryMCS · checked 6 Sep 2026
  3. Notifying DNOs, including G98 and G99MCS · checked 6 Sep 2026
  4. Smart Export Guarantee guidance for generatorsOfgem · checked 6 Sep 2026
  5. Energy-saving materials and heating equipment, VAT Notice 708/6HM Revenue and Customs · checked 6 Sep 2026
  6. Renewable Energy Consumer CodeRECC · checked 6 Sep 2026
  7. What a controller and processor contract must includeInformation Commissioner's Office · checked 6 Sep 2026
  8. Guide to international transfersInformation Commissioner's Office · checked 6 Sep 2026
  9. PricingQuickest Solar CRM · checked 6 Sep 2026
  10. Security and data protectionQuickest Solar CRM · checked 6 Sep 2026
  11. UK product and featuresPayaca · checked 6 Sep 2026
  12. UK pricingPayaca · checked 6 Sep 2026
  13. UK solar CRMPylon · checked 6 Sep 2026
  14. UK pricingPylon · checked 6 Sep 2026
  15. Solar company CRMBusiness Pilot · checked 6 Sep 2026
  16. Subscription and data FAQsBusiness Pilot · checked 6 Sep 2026
  17. UK solar CRMTradify · checked 6 Sep 2026
  18. UK plans and pricingTradify · checked 6 Sep 2026
  19. Core softwareOpenSolar · checked 6 Sep 2026
  20. Free core, API Access and connector pricing changeOpenSolar · checked 6 Sep 2026
  21. UK solar sales software and CRMVoltflo · checked 6 Sep 2026
  22. Sales Hub pricingHubSpot · checked 6 Sep 2026
  23. Product and services catalogueHubSpot · checked 6 Sep 2026

Frequently asked questions about solar CRM in UK

What is the best solar CRM for a small UK installer?

Quickest Solar CRM is our first proposal-first trial for a small UK installer because it keeps lead, mobile proposal, follow-up, and pipeline work close together and publishes a free starting point. QuickEstimate publishes this ranking, and the recommendation is conditional. Quickest's public product is India-first. A UK installer must confirm GBP quotes, correct VAT treatment, MCS records, G98 and G99 tasks, SEG handover, RECC evidence, UK GDPR transfer terms, and local support before using it with customers. OpenSolar or Pylon may be the stronger companion when design matters most. Tradify may suit a trade-led business that needs scheduling and invoices. Payaca offers the strongest publicly documented end-to-end UK operations coverage, but its normal plan targets a larger budget and team. Run the same three deals in two tools instead of selecting from the feature table alone.

Do UK solar companies need a solar-specific CRM?

A solar-specific CRM is helpful when it carries property, system, design, proposal, grid, install, certificate, and aftercare data without a large custom build. It is not automatically better. HubSpot can manage contacts, deals, forms, email, and reporting well, but the team must configure the solar stages and connect design and delivery tools. Payaca, Pylon, OpenSolar, Voltflo, and Quickest begin closer to part of the solar workflow, although their coverage differs. Decide by testing the expensive handoff. If your main problem is missed lead response, a general CRM may be enough. If teams repeatedly copy system details into proposals, G98 or G99 files, job sheets, handover packs, and invoices, a solar or installer-specific platform deserves more weight. The key question is how much configuration and ongoing administration your company can support.

Can solar CRM software manage MCS documentation?

Some platforms can manage parts of the MCS document process, but the exact output matters. Payaca publicly documents MCS compliance records and handover packs in its UK workflow. Other vendors may store files, create forms, or market to MCS-certified installers without generating the same records. Ask each vendor to show the Solar PV Installation Standard workflow, mandatory fields, approvals, version history, commissioning evidence, customer documents, certificate reference, and final export. MCS certifies installers and products, not a CRM's marketing promise. Software can support a controlled process, but the installer remains responsible for the work, records, and customer protection. If the product only attaches a final PDF, also ask where the structured equipment and property data lives when a design or component changes.

Can a CRM submit G98 or G99 applications to the DNO?

A CRM can track the task, hold the technical information, create forms, or connect to a submission service. Direct submission should be accepted only after a live demonstration. Payaca says its UK platform submits DNO applications through ENA Connect. The checked pages for Quickest, Pylon, Business Pilot, Tradify, OpenSolar, Voltflo, and HubSpot did not prove the same native submission. MCS guidance says all generating installations must be notified. Where G98 applies below 16 amps per phase, the DNO is notified within 28 days after commissioning. Where G99 applies above 16 amps per phase, prior permission is needed. Test a battery case too, since storage affects connection treatment. The system should record the DNO, capacity, inverter, form, reference, approval, deadline, owner, and evidence even when submission happens elsewhere.

What is the difference between a solar CRM, design tool, and field service system?

A CRM manages people, companies, leads, opportunities, communication, follow-up, and sales reporting. A solar design tool models the proposed PV and battery system, production, layout, equipment, and customer economics. A field service or job management system schedules surveys and installations, dispatches staff, records time and materials, captures site evidence, and supports invoicing or service. Some products cross the boundaries. OpenSolar and Pylon start close to design and proposals. HubSpot starts with generic sales and marketing. Tradify and Business Pilot lean toward job and installation management. Payaca aims to cover CRM through handover for clean-tech installers. Quickest focuses on proposal-first sales adoption. Buyers should map their real tools and data flow because an all-in-one label does not guarantee equal depth in every layer.

How much does solar CRM software cost in the UK?

The public prices in this comparison range from free core access to more than £1,000 per month, but the products are not equivalent. OpenSolar keeps its core internal platform free while charging for API Access and supported connectors. Pylon lists £4 or £10 per design project and a CRM add-on from £49 per user per month. Tradify lists £34 to £44 per user per month. Business Pilot states a £240 monthly minimum and a 24-month minimum term. Payaca Growth is £1,199 monthly or £999 monthly when billed annually, with 25 users and a £1,500 onboarding charge. Quickest publishes Indian pricing at ₹6,999 per user per year for Pro with a three-user minimum, so UK commercial terms must be confirmed. Add migration, SMS, payments, integrations, API access, training, support, and internal administration before comparing totals.

Is OpenSolar a CRM, and can it replace one?

OpenSolar supports an end-to-end solar workflow inside its platform, including project, design, proposal, and customer-facing work. For a small team with a simple sales process, that may cover much of what it expects from a CRM. A company with advanced lead routing, marketing attribution, multichannel sequences, detailed sales permissions, install scheduling, compliance ownership, or cross-team reporting may still need a dedicated CRM or operations platform. OpenSolar announced that the core app remains free, while API Access and supported connectors became chargeable from 16 April 2026. That matters when the plan is to synchronise OpenSolar with another CRM, accounting package, or reporting system. Test the internal workflow first, then obtain current connector and API prices for every external handoff you require.

What integrations should a UK solar CRM have?

Start with the tools already carrying important data. Common checks include OpenSolar, EasyPV, Pylon, or another design system; Xero, QuickBooks, or Sage for accounting; email and calendar sync; website and paid-lead forms; e-signatures; payments; and SMS or other customer communication. A UK operations team may also value ENA Connect or a documented DNO route. An integration logo is not enough. Import a real lead, revise the address and system size, change the quote, accept it, issue the invoice, and inspect both systems. Check which product is the source of truth, how duplicates are handled, how failed syncs are reported, whether attachments move, and whether API or connector charges apply. OpenSolar's 2026 change shows why external data movement belongs in the budget.

Is a cloud solar CRM automatically compliant with UK GDPR?

No. Cloud hosting or a UK data centre can support a compliant process, but neither proves compliance by itself. A solar company should identify whether it is the controller and how the CRM vendor acts as processor. The ICO says the contract should cover documented instructions, confidentiality, security, subprocessors, help with individual rights, end-of-contract deletion or return, and audits. If personal information is stored or accessed outside the UK, assess the international transfer route and safeguards. Also test permissions, retention, export, deletion, security logging, and breach support. Business Pilot says its data is stored on UK Microsoft Azure servers. Quickest publicly describes Mumbai AWS hosting for its India product. Both still require a review of the full contract, access model, subprocessors, and company process.

How should a UK installer test a solar CRM before buying?

Use three live or carefully redacted deals. The first should be an ordinary residential lead from capture through proposal and installation handoff. The second should change address details, consumption, system size, equipment, battery, price, VAT, and install date after the first proposal. The third should reproduce a past failure, such as a duplicate lead, missed follow-up, expired quote, delayed G99 decision, missing commissioning photograph, or unpaid invoice. Give the test to a salesperson, surveyor, operations user, and manager. Record completion time, repeated typing, stale documents, permission problems, mobile friction, and support response. Request the contract, data processing agreement, subprocessor list, export sample, and full cost. Pick the product that passes your expensive handoff, even if another product has more features on paper.

Still deciding?

Take the comparison into your next vendor demo.

Use the Three-Deal Proof and require every vendor to show the same lead, revision, document, and failed handoff.