Solar workflow depth
Can the product carry system details, proposal status, project milestones, and the delivery handoff without rebuilding the process in custom fields?
Quickest Solar CRM ranks first under our proposal-first value and adoption lens. This guide also shows where its UK localisation still needs proof, then compares seven alternatives across MCS records, G98 and G99 handoffs, SEG, design, scheduling, pricing, and UK GDPR procurement.
Direct answer
Quickest Solar CRM is our number-one proposal-first choice for UK solar teams that value fast mobile quoting, a focused pipeline, and a low-friction starting point. Its public product is India-first, however, so a UK buyer must verify GBP and VAT logic, MCS records, DNO and SEG workflows, RECC process support, and UK GDPR transfer terms. Payaca is the strongest alternative when verified UK compliance and end-to-end installation operations matter more than the fastest path to a proposal.
8 jobs, 8 picks
A useful shortlist starts with the sales or delivery bottleneck. Each winner below reflects a different buying priority, while the overall ranking rewards a CRM that a solar sales team can adopt quickly.
UK solar sales teams testing fast mobile proposals and disciplined follow-up
Indian public pricing. Pro requires at least three users. Confirm UK commercial terms. 02Best verified UK operationsPayacaGrowing clean-tech installers replacing separate CRM, job, compliance, and field tools
Growth includes 25 users; £1,500 onboarding. Eligible Accelerator plans cost less for 12 months. 03Best design plus optional CRMPylonSolar companies that want pay-per-project design, proposals, and a connected CRM add-on
Standard and Pro design projects are pay as you go. CRM is a separate monthly add-on. 04Best installation-company ERPBusiness PilotInstallation businesses that need post-sale scheduling, process control, documents, finance, and field visibility
Equivalent to three full users, with a public 24-month minimum subscription term. 05Best for small trade teamsTradifyInstallers that want enquiries, quotes, scheduling, jobs, invoices, payments, and mobile work
Lite, Pro, and Plus public prices. Fourteen-day trial; some SMS and website features cost extra. 06Best free core design platformOpenSolarSolar teams prioritising system design, proposals, and project work inside a free core platform
API Access and supported third-party connectors became chargeable from 16 April 2026. 07Best for lead qualificationVoltfloUK and Irish installers focused on self-qualified leads, quick proposals, booking, and marketing attribution
The official page says pricing is tailored to business size and needs. 08Best generic marketing CRMHubSpotMarketing-led teams willing to configure solar stages and connect specialist design and operations tools
Official global catalogue price. Obtain current UK GBP pricing and tax from checkout or sales.How we evaluated
We read the live UK search results, checked official product and pricing pages, and compared each platform with a real British installer journey. The overall order gives extra weight to how quickly a sales team can adopt the CRM, issue a clear proposal, and maintain follow-up. UK compliance and delivery depth are reported separately and can change the right choice for a specific installer. No product receives a numeric score because public documentation cannot show day-to-day usability with enough precision.
Can the product carry system details, proposal status, project milestones, and the delivery handoff without rebuilding the process in custom fields?
Can managers route leads, track activity, automate follow-up, forecast revenue, and see why an opportunity stalled?
Can a rep move from site information to a credible customer proposal, and how much specialist solar design happens inside the platform?
Does the workflow support the language, currency, tax, communications, documents, and handoffs common in the United Kingdom?
What setup, migration, training, administration, and extra software does the apparent subscription require?
At-a-glance matrix
The table separates CRM depth from proposal, design, and operations coverage. Confirm plan limits and country availability in writing before signing.
Local billing check: confirm GBP pricing, tax treatment, contract currency, and payment fees in writing.
| Platform | Best for | Public price | Solar proposals | Design | Project operations | CRM depth | Free access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Quickest Solar CRM | UK solar sales teams testing fast mobile proposals and disciplined follow-up | Free; Pro ₹6,999/user/year | Core strength; UK outputs require validation | Proposal and pricing layer, not documented as full UK PV design | Lead and pipeline workflow | Focused solar sales CRM | 10 proposals/month for one user |
| 2Payaca | Growing clean-tech installers replacing separate CRM, job, compliance, and field tools | Growth from £999/month annually | Interactive proposals and e-signatures | Imports from OpenSolar, EasyPV, and HeatPunk | Broad scheduling, field, finance, and compliance | Purpose-built clean-tech CRM | Demo; no public permanent free plan found |
| 3Pylon | Solar companies that want pay-per-project design, proposals, and a connected CRM add-on | £4 or £10/project; CRM from £49/user/month | Web and PDF proposals with e-signature options | Strong solar and battery design focus | Project records and installer outputs | Optional solar CRM add-on | Five Standard project credits |
| 4Business Pilot | Installation businesses that need post-sale scheduling, process control, documents, finance, and field visibility | Minimum £240/month | Stores quotes; not a pricing system | Connects to separate pricing or design tools | Deep installation scheduling and status control | CRM plus installer ERP functions | Free trial available |
| 5Tradify | Installers that want enquiries, quotes, scheduling, jobs, invoices, payments, and mobile work | £34 to £44/user/month | Branded quotes and automatic reminders | No specialist PV design verified | Strong job, schedule, invoice, and payment flow | Practical trade customer management | Fourteen-day trial |
| 6OpenSolar | Solar teams prioritising system design, proposals, and project work inside a free core platform | Core platform free | Solar-specific customer proposals | Core product strength | Project workflow inside OpenSolar | Useful internal workflow; assess advanced sales needs | Core app remains free |
| 7Voltflo | UK and Irish installers focused on self-qualified leads, quick proposals, booking, and marketing attribution | Custom quote | Instant branded solar proposals | Works alongside specialist design products | Sales-focused rather than full field operations | Solar pipeline and attribution | Demo; no public permanent free plan found |
| 8HubSpot | Marketing-led teams willing to configure solar stages and connect specialist design and operations tools | Free tools; paid from US$20/seat/month | Generic quoting and integrations by plan | Requires a specialist solar tool | Needs configuration and integrations | Deep general sales and marketing CRM | Free CRM tools |
Pricing and capability labels were checked against official sources on 6 September 2026. Currency conversion is intentionally omitted where a vendor does not publish a local price.
Country research
A British residential solar sale moves through survey data, system design, consumer information, grid connection, commissioning, certification, export setup, payment, and aftercare. A CRM is useful only when it keeps the commercial and operational record connected. The evidence below explains why local workflow proof matters more than a long generic feature list.
MCS reported 267,032 certified rooftop solar installations during 2025, 31 percent above the previous annual record set in 2011. The same release counted 369,000 certified small-scale renewable installations across solar, heat pumps, and batteries in 2025. That volume increases the cost of copying customer, property, design, and handover details between disconnected tools. A CRM cannot install a system, but it can make ownership, deadlines, and missing records visible before they become customer problems.
MCS: UK homes installed a small-scale renewable every 90 seconds ↗MCS says certified installers follow its Installation Standards and use products assessed under Product Standards. Its library includes the Solar PV Installation Standard, contractor requirements, and customer commitment material. This makes document control a buying requirement. Ask a CRM vendor to show how proposal versions, design files, commissioning evidence, warranty documents, and certificate references stay attached to one job. A statement that a product serves MCS installers is not proof that it creates compliant records.
MCS: Standards and Tools Library ↗Every electricity-generating installation must reach the relevant Distribution Network Operator. MCS guidance says a G98 solar installation below 16 amps per phase is notified within 28 days after commissioning. Where G99 applies above 16 amps per phase, prior permission to connect is required. The CRM should record the DNO, capacity, inverter, application route, form version, approval reference, deadline, and responsible person. Direct submission should be claimed only when the vendor documents it.
MCS: Notifying DNOs, including G98 and G99 ↗The Smart Export Guarantee is not one universal tariff. Ofgem says an eligible generator applies to a SEG licensee, and each licensee sets its application process, payment amount, and contract length. A practical handover record therefore needs the MCS certificate status, export meter information, chosen supplier, customer documents, and follow-up date. Hard-coding one headline export rate can create a misleading proposal when supplier terms change.
Ofgem: Smart Export Guarantee guidance for generators ↗HMRC's current notice says qualifying installations of energy-saving materials are zero-rated through 31 March 2027. The published position returns them to the reduced 5 percent rate from 1 April 2027. Solar panels and batteries appear in the detailed scope. A UK quote tool should handle pounds, tax-inclusive and tax-exclusive totals, deposits, variations, and the tax point. It should also preserve which rate was used when an old proposal is revised after a rule change.
HM Revenue and Customs: Energy-saving materials and heating equipment, VAT Notice 708/6 ↗Customer names, addresses, meter details, energy data, photographs, signatures, and finance notes can all sit in a solar CRM. The ICO says processor contracts need terms covering documented instructions, confidentiality, security, subprocessors, individual rights, deletion or return, and audits. For an overseas platform, ask where information is stored and accessed, which transfer mechanism applies, and how a full export works. A hosting-region statement by itself is not a complete UK GDPR answer.
Information Commissioner's Office: What a controller and processor contract must include ↗Full reviews
Each review explains the useful workflow, the buyer who should shortlist it, and the country-specific question that a sales demo must answer.
Quickest is the first product we would trial when the buying goal is faster proposal adoption, but no UK team should roll it out until the local acceptance checklist passes.
Quickest keeps its product promise narrow enough to understand: capture a solar lead, create a branded proposal quickly, send it from a mobile workflow, maintain follow-up, and give the manager a pipeline view. The public plan lets one user send 10 proposals each month without a card or expiry. Pro is listed at ₹6,999 per user per year with a three-user minimum. For a small sales team, this creates a practical adoption experiment. The team can judge whether reps stop building quotes in documents and whether owners gain a consistent pipeline without starting with a long implementation project.
That strength explains our number-one position under a proposal-first value and adoption lens. It does not establish a broad UK operations lead. Quickest's public pages describe an Indian product, including rupee pricing, PM Surya Ghar subsidy calculations, DISCOM logic, GST invoicing, and Mumbai AWS hosting. None of those points proves the British requirements in this guide. We did not find public proof of GBP and UK VAT logic, MCS packs, G98 or G99 submission, SEG handover, RECC process controls, UK accounting, UK SMS, or local support hours. These are acceptance questions, not small-print caveats.
A responsible UK trial should create and revise a real GBP proposal, preserve the correct VAT rate, attach the design, assign DNO tasks, and produce a complete handover record. The buyer should also receive the data processing agreement, subprocessor list, security details, international transfer safeguards, retention and deletion rules, and an export sample. If Quickest passes those checks and wins the Three-Deal Proof, its focused workflow can justify adoption. If compliance and installation delivery are the immediate bottleneck, Payaca, Business Pilot, Tradify, Pylon, or OpenSolar may be the more sensible starting point.
Choose it if: your first goal is to make salespeople produce consistent mobile proposals and follow up inside one focused system, and Quickest passes every required UK acceptance check. Choose another platform if: you need documented UK compliance, DNO submission, detailed PV design, field scheduling, or accounting integration before changing the sales process.
Payaca has the strongest publicly documented UK compliance and end-to-end installation workflow in this shortlist, with a price and implementation model aimed at teams running their operation on it.
Payaca presents itself as an operating system for UK solar, heat-pump, battery, and EV-charger installers. Its public feature pages cover lead and pipeline management, interactive multi-option proposals, e-signatures, surveys, scheduling, field work, job forms, invoices, online payments, accounting sync, reporting, customer portals, service plans, MCS documentation, and DNO applications through ENA Connect. It also lists design imports from OpenSolar, EasyPV, and HeatPunk. That gives a buyer specific handoffs to test instead of relying on a general claim that the software understands solar.
The standard Growth plan is published at £1,199 per month or £999 per month when billed annually, with 25 users included and extra users at £30 per seat up to 50. Payaca also lists a one-off £1,500 onboarding fee for workflow mapping, migration, and training. Its Accelerator starts at £299 per month, or £249 per month annually, for 12 months. Public eligibility includes eight or fewer employees and incorporation within the previous 24 months. That introductory plan later returns to standard Growth pricing, so model both years.
The breadth is valuable when several tools and spreadsheets already create repeated entry. It also means the implementation deserves scrutiny. Bring the current pipeline, document templates, MCS process, ENA Connect case, design handoff, invoice structure, permissions, and reports to the demonstration. Ask which automations and AI allowances belong to each plan, how SMS at the published 4p per message is billed, and what data can be exported. Payaca is our second overall pick only because the declared ranking lens favours a cheaper, focused proposal adoption test. On publicly verified UK depth, Payaca leads.
Choose it if: your growing UK team wants one operational record from lead through installation, MCS and DNO work, finance, and handover. Choose another platform if: you mainly need an inexpensive proposal and follow-up tool, or you want to keep design and job operations in separate specialist products.
Pylon is the clearest shortlist choice when the sales problem begins with solar and battery design rather than with generic contact management.
Pylon combines pay-per-project solar design with customer proposals and an optional CRM. Its UK pricing page lists a Standard project at £4 and a Pro project at £10, with no monthly minimum spend. Standard includes system design, imagery, financial projections, web and PDF proposals, and battery design. Pro adds capabilities for custom load profiles and larger commercial work. This structure can fit a small installer whose design volume changes from month to month and who does not want a design seat subscription before work arrives.
The Solar CRM add-on starts at £49 per user per month. Public features include project links, email sync, automatic lead processing, SMS, web forms, AI assistance, custom pipelines, sequences, reminders, team work, lead history, and reporting. The connection between system design and the sales record is the main attraction. It reduces the risk that a rep discusses one system while the designer and proposal show another. Buyers should still test how revisions propagate and which data remains structured after acceptance.
The checked pages did not prove a complete MCS document pack, G98 or G99 submission, SEG handover, RECC evidence, or UK accounting workflow. Ask Pylon to demonstrate each requirement that matters rather than assuming a UK URL covers it. Also calculate project credits, CRM users, e-signatures, SMS, payment fees, imagery, API access, and support. Pylon deserves third place because design and proposal work sit close to the CRM, while the price model stays visible enough for a small team to estimate.
Choose it if: your team wants solar design, battery scenarios, customer proposals, and CRM records in a closely connected workflow with pay-per-project design pricing. Choose another platform if: you need proven end-to-end UK compliance operations or a deep marketing automation platform more than integrated solar design.
Business Pilot is strongest when an installation company has outgrown a sales-only CRM and needs every won contract to move through a controlled operational process.
Business Pilot is a UK CRM and enterprise resource planning product built around installation companies. Its solar page covers website lead capture, contact and contract records, sales reporting, mobile field access, interactive scheduling, status progression, documents, remedials, service calls, guarantees, financial reporting, and accounting exports. A manager can map the company's process and see where a lead or contract is stuck. Surveyors and installers can receive jobs and approved documents in the app, which addresses the handoff that sales-only CRMs often leave to email and shared folders.
The vendor is clear about a boundary: Business Pilot is not pricing software. It stores quote documents and connects with pricing tools. That honesty helps a solar buyer plan the stack. The public FAQ says there is no minimum user count but a minimum contract value of £240 per month, equivalent to three full users. It also states a 24-month minimum term, a monthly rolling arrangement after the subscription period, unlimited file storage, and UK data storage on Microsoft Azure. Verify current contract wording in the formal quote.
The checked product pages did not prove native solar design, MCS document generation, DNO submission, or SEG workflow. Business Pilot can still hold tasks and documents around those processes, but the distinction affects labour and error risk. Ask a salesperson to configure one live solar status map and show the exact file, field, reminder, and owner at each step. The platform earns fourth place for broad installation control. A business that only wants faster proposals may find it larger than necessary, while a company losing margin after acceptance should take it seriously.
Choose it if: won jobs disappear into scheduling, purchasing, document, field, remedial, and finance gaps, and your company wants an installer-focused operating record. Choose another platform if: the main need is solar design or a lightweight proposal-first CRM with a short commitment.
Tradify offers a practical bridge from enquiry to paid job for a small trade-led installer, but specialist solar design and UK solar compliance still need separate proof or tools.
Tradify starts with the daily work of a trade business. The UK solar page describes enquiry capture, contact records, draft and branded quotes, accepted-quote conversion into a job or invoice, scheduling, job tracking, invoicing, payments, and automatic email or SMS reminders. Web and mobile access gives sales and field users a shared record. It also lists connections with Xero, Sage, and QuickBooks Online. For a small contractor moving from a diary, accounting package, inbox, and spreadsheet, that is a coherent improvement without enterprise CRM administration.
Public UK prices are £34 per user per month for Lite, £37 for Pro, and £44 for Plus. Tradify offers a 14-day trial and says subscriptions are month-to-month. The pricing page shows optional charges for its Instant Website and certain text messages, including quotes, invoices, and reminders. Check the exact plan because capabilities such as forms, certificates, job costing, purchase orders, subcontractor scheduling, and reporting differ. Calculate full field-user and SMS volume, not only the owner or office licence.
Tradify mentions compliance certificates, but the checked pages did not establish an MCS Solar PV document pack, G98 or G99 submission, SEG handover, or a complete RECC process. It also does not present itself as a specialist PV design engine. A UK solar buyer should attach the design output and run its actual commissioning and handover checklist during the trial. Tradify earns fifth place because it handles the commercial and job basics clearly at an approachable public price. Teams with complex certification and DNO work may need a specialist layer.
Choose it if: your small installation team mainly needs to turn enquiries into scheduled, documented, invoiced, and paid jobs with simple mobile access. Choose another platform if: you need detailed PV design, deep marketing automation, or proven MCS and DNO submission in the same product.
OpenSolar remains an unusually accessible design and proposal choice, but its ability to replace a dedicated CRM depends on the depth of the sales, compliance, and external data workflow.
OpenSolar is built around solar professionals designing, selling, and managing projects. The core application covers more of a solar seller's work than a generic CRM because the system model, equipment, customer presentation, and project live together. A small company may decide that its internal project workflow provides enough customer management. A larger sales operation may still need advanced routing, sequences, attribution, permissions, service records, or management reporting in another CRM. The correct answer depends on process depth, not whether a page uses the CRM label.
OpenSolar confirmed that the core app remains free for work completed inside the platform. Its 2026 announcement introduced paid API Access and paid supported connectors for data moving to or from third-party systems. Charges began on 16 April 2026. The announcement does not provide one universal price, so buyers should obtain the current cost for their exact CRM, accounting, operations, and reporting connections. A free design platform can still be part of a paid multi-product stack once those handoffs are required.
For UK use, run an ordinary design and a battery case, then revise consumption, components, system size, price, and VAT. Inspect the customer output and exported data. Ask specifically about the current MCS document set, DNO application or task workflow, SEG handover, RECC records, and accounting integration. Do not assume that solar-specific design equals complete UK compliance operations. OpenSolar ranks sixth because its free core removes a major adoption barrier and its design role is clear, while this comparison gives more weight to dedicated CRM follow-up and connected delivery control.
Choose it if: solar design and customer proposals are the centre of your process and the team can work largely inside OpenSolar. Choose another platform if: you need a deeper sales CRM, field scheduling, or documented UK compliance operation with less integration work.
Voltflo is a focused option for an installer that wants its website, lead qualification, proposal, booking, pipeline, and marketing source tied together.
Voltflo focuses on the top half of a solar installer's customer journey. Its public page describes dynamic self-qualifying enquiry flows, residential and commercial lead capture, instant proposals built from the installer's equipment and prices, automated booking, pipeline management, marketing-source tracking, and Smart Sites. This combination can help a marketing-led company distinguish which campaigns produce booked and won work rather than counting form fills. It also lists native connections with GoHighLevel, HubSpot, Zoho, and Monday for companies keeping another CRM.
The vendor says all plans include its complete feature set and that pricing is tailored to company size and needs. There is no public list price on the checked page. Ask for setup, website, migration, user, messaging, automation, integration, support, and contract costs in one written quote. Voltflo also says customers typically save more than 12 admin hours per week. That is a vendor claim, so we would not use it in a business case until a customer reference and an internal time study support it.
Voltflo markets to MCS-certified installers, but the checked page did not prove native MCS packs, G98 or G99 submission, SEG handover, field scheduling, or financial operations. Its value may be to connect lead generation and sales conversion, then pass accepted work to a separate design and delivery system. Test the exact handoff and how revisions return. Voltflo ranks seventh because the main comparison lens also rewards transparent entry cost and broader CRM control, but it can outrank several products for a UK installer whose largest problem is lead quality and attribution.
Choose it if: paid lead quality, rapid qualification, proposal response, booking, and marketing attribution are the commercial bottlenecks. Choose another platform if: you need public pricing, detailed solar design, or one proven platform for compliance, installation, and finance.
HubSpot is the safest generic shortlist for a marketing-led team, provided the company accepts that UK solar design, grid, compliance, and field operations need configuration or connected products.
HubSpot provides mature contact, company, deal, email, meeting, form, marketing, reporting, and integration functions. A solar company can create a deal pipeline, route enquiries, log communication, manage campaigns, and connect web conversion to revenue. The ecosystem makes it easier to find implementation help and connect specialist tools. For an installer with a marketing team and clear system ownership, that flexibility can outweigh the convenience of a smaller vertical CRM. It can also preserve a familiar front office while a design or operations product handles technical work.
The official global product catalogue checked for this review lists Sales Hub Starter from US$20 per seat per month, Professional from US$100 per seat per month with US$1,500 onboarding, and Enterprise from US$150 per seat per month billed annually. HubSpot's interactive pricing can vary by market, package, seat type, and purchase date. A UK buyer should obtain the current GBP total, VAT treatment, onboarding, additional contacts, communication limits, and required integrations in writing rather than converting the catalogue price.
We found no native solar design, MCS document, G98 or G99 submission, SEG handover, or RECC workflow on the checked sales pricing material. Those processes need custom properties, workflows, documents, integrations, or another platform. Build a proof using one complete UK solar job and estimate the administrator time needed to maintain it. HubSpot ranks eighth because it requires the most solar configuration in this shortlist. It remains a credible choice when marketing automation and general CRM depth are more valuable than an installer-specific workflow out of the box.
Choose it if: your company has a strong marketing function, values a broad CRM ecosystem, and can own configuration and integrations. Choose another platform if: a small team needs solar design, proposals, installation tasks, or UK compliance records with less system building.
Buyer guide
Choose by the most expensive broken handoff, then test that handoff using real opportunities, real users, and the documents your customers actually receive.
Use Quickest to test mobile lead, proposal, and follow-up adoption. Pair it with a design platform when system modelling is the bottleneck. Before using Quickest with customers, verify GBP, VAT, UK documents, data terms, and support. Pylon offers another path when pay-per-project solar design and an optional CRM fit the workload better.
Quickest offers the tighter proposal-first adoption test. Payaca publicly documents a much broader UK operations layer, including MCS documentation and DNO applications through ENA Connect. Run the same two jobs in both. The answer depends on whether sales speed or the complete install and compliance handoff causes more costly errors today.
Tradify suits teams that mainly need enquiries, quotations, scheduling, job records, invoices, payments, and mobile access. Business Pilot goes deeper into installation-company status control, documents, remedials, reporting, and finance. Neither checked page proved the complete MCS, DNO, and SEG workflow, so include those demonstrations in the buying process.
Voltflo focuses on solar lead qualification, quick proposals, booking, pipeline, and attribution for UK and Irish installers. HubSpot offers a larger generic marketing and sales ecosystem. Choose based on whether your team wants solar structure from the start or has the people and budget to configure a general platform and connect specialist tools.
Both put solar design and customer presentation near the centre. Pylon publishes per-project UK prices and offers a paid CRM add-on. OpenSolar keeps its core internal workflow free but now charges for API Access and supported connectors. Test production assumptions, battery cases, proposal revisions, and the data handoff into delivery before choosing.
Payaca publishes UK clean-tech workflows and inclusive team sizes at its larger plans. A platform such as Salesforce or HubSpot may suit a company with established CRM administrators, complex marketing, and integration resources. Model implementation, data migration, training, support, security review, and two years of operating cost rather than comparing seat prices alone.
Run the same three opportunities in every shortlisted CRM: one ordinary lead, one revision-heavy project, and one deal that already failed. This removes demo theatre and exposes repeated entry, stale documents, weak mobile adoption, and missing local support.
Capture a real lead, assign it, create the proposal, schedule follow-up, record acceptance, and hand it to delivery.
Change the system, equipment, price, payment route, and installation date. Identify every stale record.
Use a duplicate, missed follow-up, rejected proposal, or delayed job and ask the CRM to show what happens next.
Create a quote in pounds, show tax-inclusive and tax-exclusive views, take a deposit, issue a revision, and preserve the original tax treatment. Ask the vendor to demonstrate how the currently published change from zero rating to 5 percent on 1 April 2027 would be configured. Product tax logic should be editable by an authorised administrator and visible in an audit trail.
List every MCS-related document your team produces, receives, or references. Then ask where the latest version lives, who can approve it, what fields are mandatory, and how it enters the customer handover pack. Do not accept the phrase MCS-ready without seeing the actual output. The installer remains responsible for the installation, certificate, consumer information, and quality process.
Test one G98 job and one project that needs G99 permission before connection. Include a battery case. The CRM should identify the DNO, hold the technical inputs and attachments, assign the next task, record approval or notification, and warn when a deadline is approaching. If a salesperson says the system submits directly, request the supported DNO list and a live demonstration.
Record the selected SEG licensee, application stage, export meter details, requested documents, and customer follow-up. Supplier terms vary, so the proposal should label its rate and assumptions rather than present a generic number as guaranteed income. The handover should make clear what the installer completed and what the customer must still send to the supplier.
For domestic sales, test how the system stores quotation versions, pre-contract information, cancellation records, customer approvals, complaints, warranty documents, and insurance-backed guarantee evidence. RECC publishes a consumer code, but software does not make conduct compliant automatically. Your process, permissions, training, and evidence must support the promises made to a household.
If design happens in OpenSolar, EasyPV, Pylon, or another platform, check which fields return to the CRM. Test address changes, revised consumption, module substitutions, battery additions, and version numbers. A PDF attachment is helpful, but structured system size, equipment, production, and pricing data often matter later for operations and reporting.
Request the data processing agreement, subprocessor list, security overview, retention controls, deletion method, export format, and international transfer safeguards. Confirm how subject access, correction, and erasure requests are handled. Overseas hosting can be lawful with the right safeguards, but a buyer needs the documents and facts to assess its own obligations.
Have a field user open the property record, view design details, complete a task, capture photographs, upload a document, and collect a signature from a phone. Check offline behaviour, upload limits, role permissions, and whether field access needs a full paid licence. A desktop-only workflow often pushes the real evidence back into messaging apps and shared drives.
Confirm the exact Xero, QuickBooks, or Sage handoff, including customer, invoice, tax, payment, and credit-note fields. Add SMS, payment processing, email volume, connector, API, and phone costs to the annual budget. A cheap CRM can become an expensive stack when quoting, design, e-signature, messaging, and job scheduling are separate subscriptions.
Import a sample containing duplicate people, two properties for one customer, open proposals, attachments, activity history, and consent records. Then export it again. Confirm setup fees, minimum seats, minimum term, notice period, API access, and attachment export. The ability to leave cleanly is part of a reliable CRM decision, even when the team expects to stay.
The real budget
Public pricing ranges from a free core design platform to more than £1,000 per month for an operations system serving a larger team. Those figures buy different things. A fair budget separates CRM seats, solar design projects, onboarding, data migration, messaging, payment processing, connectors, API access, field users, and the internal time needed to configure and maintain the workflow.
Indian public pricing. Pro requires at least three users. Confirm UK commercial terms.
Growth includes 25 users; £1,500 onboarding. Eligible Accelerator plans cost less for 12 months.
Standard and Pro design projects are pay as you go. CRM is a separate monthly add-on.
Equivalent to three full users, with a public 24-month minimum subscription term.
Quickest publishes a free plan with 10 proposals per month for one user and a Pro plan at ₹6,999 per user per year with a three-user minimum. That is Indian pricing, not a quoted UK tariff. Keep the original currency in the comparison and ask QuickEstimate to confirm UK availability, GBP billing, tax treatment, payment method, data terms, and support before relying on a converted figure.
Payaca publishes Growth at £1,199 per month, or £999 per month when billed annually, with 25 users included and a £1,500 onboarding fee. Its Accelerator can cost £299 per month, or £249 per month annually for 12 months, for qualifying young installers. Pylon publishes £4 per Standard design project, £10 per Pro project, and a Solar CRM add-on starting at £49 per user per month.
Business Pilot's public FAQ states a £240 monthly minimum, equivalent to three full users, plus a 24-month minimum subscription term. Tradify lists Lite at £34, Pro at £37, and Plus at £44 per user per month, with additional charges for some SMS and website functions. Voltflo uses tailored pricing. OpenSolar says its core internal platform remains free, while API Access and supported connectors became chargeable from 16 April 2026.
Run a 12-month and 24-month total-cost model. Include VAT where applicable, implementation, imports, custom forms, e-signatures, telephone and SMS use, payment fees, design credits, API or connector charges, extra storage, support, and an internal system owner. Then place the cost beside one measurable bottleneck, such as proposal turnaround, missed lead follow-up, repeated data entry, stalled DNO cases, or delayed invoices.
Our number-one pick
Quickest ranks first because this comparison gives the most weight to proposal-first value and adoption. A CRM only creates value when salespeople use it. Quickest presents a focused path from lead to mobile proposal, follow-up, and pipeline visibility, with a public free starting point. That narrower path can be easier to test than a large operations or enterprise platform. It is a defensible first trial for a small or growing solar sales team that wants to change behaviour quickly.
The ranking does not mean Quickest has the deepest verified UK feature set. It does not. The public product and pricing pages describe an India-first system with rupee billing, PM Surya Ghar subsidy logic, DISCOM calculations, WhatsApp workflows, and Mumbai hosting. Those details are useful evidence about the existing product, but they do not prove British VAT, MCS, DNO, SEG, RECC, or UK GDPR transfer support. We would reject a UK rollout that relied on assumptions instead of a documented acceptance test.
Before a UK team uses Quickest with live customers, it should create a GBP quote with the right VAT treatment, revise that quote, attach the design, route one G98 job, track one G99 approval, assemble the required customer records, and complete an MCS and SEG handover checklist. It should also receive the data processing agreement, subprocessor information, hosting and access details, international transfer safeguards, deletion terms, and a usable data export.
Payaca is the stronger choice when the buyer wants UK clean-tech operations already documented by the vendor. Pylon and OpenSolar are stronger starting points when detailed solar design drives the purchase. Business Pilot and Tradify deserve attention when scheduling, field work, invoicing, and post-sale control cause the largest losses. Voltflo and HubSpot fit marketing-led teams in different ways. Ranking Quickest first should start a two-product comparison, not end the procurement process.
The best decision is measurable. Ask three real users to run three real deals during the trial. Record the time from lead capture to sent proposal, every duplicate entry, every stale version, every missing task, and every support question. If Quickest wins that test and the UK checks are documented, it earns the rollout. If it does not, the specialist closest to the failed handoff is the better CRM for that company.
Your next move
Start with Quickest and the specialist closest to your largest local requirement. Use the same evidence and test deals for both.
Name the bottleneck. Pick lead response, proposal speed, design, payment, install handoff, or management visibility.
Choose two tools. Compare Quickest with the strongest specialist for that bottleneck.
Run the Three-Deal Proof. Score adoption, repeated entry, revision handling, support, and full annual cost.
Research record
These sources support the market, regulatory, product, and pricing statements on this page. Product terms can change after the checked date.
Common questions
Quickest Solar CRM is our first proposal-first trial for a small UK installer because it keeps lead, mobile proposal, follow-up, and pipeline work close together and publishes a free starting point. QuickEstimate publishes this ranking, and the recommendation is conditional. Quickest's public product is India-first. A UK installer must confirm GBP quotes, correct VAT treatment, MCS records, G98 and G99 tasks, SEG handover, RECC evidence, UK GDPR transfer terms, and local support before using it with customers. OpenSolar or Pylon may be the stronger companion when design matters most. Tradify may suit a trade-led business that needs scheduling and invoices. Payaca offers the strongest publicly documented end-to-end UK operations coverage, but its normal plan targets a larger budget and team. Run the same three deals in two tools instead of selecting from the feature table alone.
A solar-specific CRM is helpful when it carries property, system, design, proposal, grid, install, certificate, and aftercare data without a large custom build. It is not automatically better. HubSpot can manage contacts, deals, forms, email, and reporting well, but the team must configure the solar stages and connect design and delivery tools. Payaca, Pylon, OpenSolar, Voltflo, and Quickest begin closer to part of the solar workflow, although their coverage differs. Decide by testing the expensive handoff. If your main problem is missed lead response, a general CRM may be enough. If teams repeatedly copy system details into proposals, G98 or G99 files, job sheets, handover packs, and invoices, a solar or installer-specific platform deserves more weight. The key question is how much configuration and ongoing administration your company can support.
Some platforms can manage parts of the MCS document process, but the exact output matters. Payaca publicly documents MCS compliance records and handover packs in its UK workflow. Other vendors may store files, create forms, or market to MCS-certified installers without generating the same records. Ask each vendor to show the Solar PV Installation Standard workflow, mandatory fields, approvals, version history, commissioning evidence, customer documents, certificate reference, and final export. MCS certifies installers and products, not a CRM's marketing promise. Software can support a controlled process, but the installer remains responsible for the work, records, and customer protection. If the product only attaches a final PDF, also ask where the structured equipment and property data lives when a design or component changes.
A CRM can track the task, hold the technical information, create forms, or connect to a submission service. Direct submission should be accepted only after a live demonstration. Payaca says its UK platform submits DNO applications through ENA Connect. The checked pages for Quickest, Pylon, Business Pilot, Tradify, OpenSolar, Voltflo, and HubSpot did not prove the same native submission. MCS guidance says all generating installations must be notified. Where G98 applies below 16 amps per phase, the DNO is notified within 28 days after commissioning. Where G99 applies above 16 amps per phase, prior permission is needed. Test a battery case too, since storage affects connection treatment. The system should record the DNO, capacity, inverter, form, reference, approval, deadline, owner, and evidence even when submission happens elsewhere.
A CRM manages people, companies, leads, opportunities, communication, follow-up, and sales reporting. A solar design tool models the proposed PV and battery system, production, layout, equipment, and customer economics. A field service or job management system schedules surveys and installations, dispatches staff, records time and materials, captures site evidence, and supports invoicing or service. Some products cross the boundaries. OpenSolar and Pylon start close to design and proposals. HubSpot starts with generic sales and marketing. Tradify and Business Pilot lean toward job and installation management. Payaca aims to cover CRM through handover for clean-tech installers. Quickest focuses on proposal-first sales adoption. Buyers should map their real tools and data flow because an all-in-one label does not guarantee equal depth in every layer.
The public prices in this comparison range from free core access to more than £1,000 per month, but the products are not equivalent. OpenSolar keeps its core internal platform free while charging for API Access and supported connectors. Pylon lists £4 or £10 per design project and a CRM add-on from £49 per user per month. Tradify lists £34 to £44 per user per month. Business Pilot states a £240 monthly minimum and a 24-month minimum term. Payaca Growth is £1,199 monthly or £999 monthly when billed annually, with 25 users and a £1,500 onboarding charge. Quickest publishes Indian pricing at ₹6,999 per user per year for Pro with a three-user minimum, so UK commercial terms must be confirmed. Add migration, SMS, payments, integrations, API access, training, support, and internal administration before comparing totals.
OpenSolar supports an end-to-end solar workflow inside its platform, including project, design, proposal, and customer-facing work. For a small team with a simple sales process, that may cover much of what it expects from a CRM. A company with advanced lead routing, marketing attribution, multichannel sequences, detailed sales permissions, install scheduling, compliance ownership, or cross-team reporting may still need a dedicated CRM or operations platform. OpenSolar announced that the core app remains free, while API Access and supported connectors became chargeable from 16 April 2026. That matters when the plan is to synchronise OpenSolar with another CRM, accounting package, or reporting system. Test the internal workflow first, then obtain current connector and API prices for every external handoff you require.
Start with the tools already carrying important data. Common checks include OpenSolar, EasyPV, Pylon, or another design system; Xero, QuickBooks, or Sage for accounting; email and calendar sync; website and paid-lead forms; e-signatures; payments; and SMS or other customer communication. A UK operations team may also value ENA Connect or a documented DNO route. An integration logo is not enough. Import a real lead, revise the address and system size, change the quote, accept it, issue the invoice, and inspect both systems. Check which product is the source of truth, how duplicates are handled, how failed syncs are reported, whether attachments move, and whether API or connector charges apply. OpenSolar's 2026 change shows why external data movement belongs in the budget.
No. Cloud hosting or a UK data centre can support a compliant process, but neither proves compliance by itself. A solar company should identify whether it is the controller and how the CRM vendor acts as processor. The ICO says the contract should cover documented instructions, confidentiality, security, subprocessors, help with individual rights, end-of-contract deletion or return, and audits. If personal information is stored or accessed outside the UK, assess the international transfer route and safeguards. Also test permissions, retention, export, deletion, security logging, and breach support. Business Pilot says its data is stored on UK Microsoft Azure servers. Quickest publicly describes Mumbai AWS hosting for its India product. Both still require a review of the full contract, access model, subprocessors, and company process.
Use three live or carefully redacted deals. The first should be an ordinary residential lead from capture through proposal and installation handoff. The second should change address details, consumption, system size, equipment, battery, price, VAT, and install date after the first proposal. The third should reproduce a past failure, such as a duplicate lead, missed follow-up, expired quote, delayed G99 decision, missing commissioning photograph, or unpaid invoice. Give the test to a salesperson, surveyor, operations user, and manager. Record completion time, repeated typing, stale documents, permission problems, mobile friction, and support response. Request the contract, data processing agreement, subprocessor list, export sample, and full cost. Pick the product that passes your expensive handoff, even if another product has more features on paper.
Use the Three-Deal Proof and require every vendor to show the same lead, revision, document, and failed handoff.