Solar workflow depth
Can the product carry system details, proposal status, project milestones, and the delivery handoff without rebuilding the process in custom fields?
Quickest Solar CRM is our first pick for a small Maltese installer that needs faster branded proposals and visible follow-up, provided it passes a complete Malta pilot. OpenSolar is the free design-first route. Pylon, EasySolar, and Solargraf offer solar design and proposal candidates, while Zoho CRM and HubSpot suit configurable commercial or marketing stacks. We compare seven products against EUR and 18% VAT, current REWS feed-in tariff status, application and export caps, Enemalta and ARMS meter-connection paths, English and Maltese documents, GDPR, installation, commissioning, handover, and service.
Direct answer
Quickest ranks first under our disclosed proposal-first adoption method because a small installer can test its focused mobile sales workflow through the free plan. QuickEstimate owns Quickest, and the ranking is not independent. Quickest has no verified public proof for euros, Maltese VAT or invoicing, Maltese documents, REWS feed-in tariff workflows, Enemalta or ARMS applications, Malta electricity data, GDPR terms, accounting, hosting, local support, commissioning, handover, or service. OpenSolar is the stronger free design route. Pylon, EasySolar, and Solargraf are engineering candidates. Zoho and HubSpot require solar and field connections.
7 jobs, 7 picks
A useful shortlist starts with the sales or delivery bottleneck. Each winner below reflects a different buying priority, while the overall ranking rewards a CRM that a solar sales team can adopt quickly.
Small teams testing mobile proposals and follow-up
Free: 1 user and 10 proposals monthly. Pro: INR 6,999 per user yearly, minimum 3 users. 02Best free design-first platformOpenSolarStartups combining solar design, proposals, and project CRM
OpenSolar says its core platform is free; review connected services, integrations, implementation, and support. 03Best compact design and CRM evaluationPylonTeams testing solar and battery proposals with an optional CRM
Confirm local billing currency, project credits, optional CRM, taxes, support, and renewal. 04Best visual solar sales candidateEasySolarTeams prioritising photovoltaic design, visualisation, and proposals
Confirm billing currency, users, projects, premium features, implementation, support, and renewal. 05Best guided proposal candidateSolargrafTeams wanting solar design, proposals, and sales tools
Confirm availability, currency, users, design volume, premium data, support, implementation, and renewal. 06Best configurable general CRMZoho CRMBusinesses wanting broad pipeline and workflow configuration
Price required users, editions, add-ons, implementation, support, storage, and integrations. 07Best for acquisition-led teamsHubSpot CRMInstallers prioritising forms, email, meetings, and pipeline
Price users, contacts, hubs, onboarding, automation, support, storage, and integrations.How we evaluated
We followed one customer and premises record from enquiry and electricity bill through survey, design, proposal, consent, tax review, feed-in tariff eligibility check, REWS request where applicable, ARMS and Enemalta application path, infrastructure work, equipment ordering, installation, meter connection, commissioning, handover, and service. Proposal adoption receives the greatest weight, followed by Malta commercial fit, solar engineering, delivery control, and CRM depth. Official tax, regulator, utility, privacy, and EU sources establish the test. Vendor pages establish only public descriptions. We did not use unsupported performance figures or assume local support from global availability.
Can the product carry system details, proposal status, project milestones, and the delivery handoff without rebuilding the process in custom fields?
Can managers route leads, track activity, automate follow-up, forecast revenue, and see why an opportunity stalled?
Can a rep move from site information to a credible customer proposal, and how much specialist solar design happens inside the platform?
Does the workflow support the language, currency, tax, communications, documents, and handoffs common in Malta?
What setup, migration, training, administration, and extra software does the apparent subscription require?
At-a-glance matrix
The table separates CRM depth from proposal, design, and operations coverage. Confirm plan limits and country availability in writing before signing.
Local billing check: confirm EUR pricing, tax treatment, contract currency, and payment fees in writing.
| Platform | Best for | Public price | Solar proposals | Design | Project operations | CRM depth | Free access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Quickest Solar CRM | Small teams testing mobile proposals and follow-up | Free plan; Pro billed in INR | Focused branded proposal workflow | Local engineering support unverified | Lead ownership and follow-up | Focused solar sales CRM | 1 user, 10 proposals monthly |
| 2OpenSolar | Startups combining solar design, proposals, and project CRM | Free core platform | Interactive and PDF proposals | Native solar and storage design | Project CRM, tasks, schedules, and files | Solar project CRM | Core platform described as free |
| 3Pylon | Teams testing solar and battery proposals with an optional CRM | Prices displayed in dollars | Web and PDF proposals | Solar and battery design | Optional solar CRM and integrations | Solar CRM option | Five Standard Project credits |
| 4EasySolar | Teams prioritising photovoltaic design, visualisation, and proposals | Request current local terms | Solar proposal and visualisation | Photovoltaic design | Sales and project functions published | Solar sales platform | Confirm trial terms |
| 5Solargraf | Teams wanting solar design, proposals, and sales tools | Request regional terms | Solar proposal workflow | Solar design tools | Sales-oriented project workflow | Solar sales platform | Request demo or trial terms |
| 6Zoho CRM | Businesses wanting broad pipeline and workflow configuration | Free and paid plans published | Configure or connect solar proposals | Specialist solar software required | Sales automation and configurable workflow | Broad general CRM | Free edition available |
| 7HubSpot CRM | Installers prioritising forms, email, meetings, and pipeline | Free CRM; paid hubs available | Configure or connect solar proposals | Specialist solar software required | Marketing, sales, and service expansion | Broad customer platform | Free CRM available |
Pricing and capability labels were checked against official sources on Sep 6, 2026. Currency conversion is intentionally omitted where a vendor does not publish a local price.
Country research
REWS describes feed-in tariffs as payment for electricity generated and exported to the grid and points users to a current scheme table and PV capping status. Enemalta publishes different meter-connection paths for an existing account, a new account with consumption, generation only, a third-party account, extra generation, repowering, and add-on cases. A CRM should select the path from verified account, capacity, ownership, grant, and equipment facts. It should keep every proposal revision connected to the correct application, meter, tariff allocation, installed equipment, and handover evidence.
The Malta Tax and Customs Administration states that supplies taking place in Malta are taxable by default at the 18% standard VAT rate, while specifically defined goods and services can use reduced or zero rates. Its page says the standard rate applies unless a reduced rate or exemption specifically applies. A CRM should store the item and service classification, tax basis, reviewer, date, net value, VAT, gross value, deposit, milestones, and correction history. Test solar, storage, repair, maintenance, and mixed scopes with a Maltese tax professional.
Malta Tax and Customs Administration: VAT rates ↗REWS defines a feed-in tariff as payment for electricity generated and exported to the grid. Its FAQ says net metering is no longer an option for PV systems approved after 10 September 2010, directs applicants to the current scheme table and PV capping status, and describes an online tariff request for PV systems below 40 kWp while allocation is available. It also says exported electricity paid at the tariff is subject to scheme caps. Check current availability, category, capacity, grant interaction, cap, term, and approval for each sale.
REWS: Feed-in tariff schemes ↗Enemalta publishes a December 2025 guide for PV systems greater than 16 amperes per phase. It distinguishes existing accounts, new accounts with generation and consumption, generation-only accounts, third-party accounts, additional generation meters, repowering, new plus add-on, and shift plus add-on cases. The guide identifies ARMS applications, import-export and PV meter arrangements, and possible infrastructure upgrades and charges. The CRM should store the selected case, account, forms, charges, work, meters, approvals, and installed version.
Enemalta: Guide on the mode of PV meter connection ↗The Enemalta guide says some cases require infrastructure alterations or upgrades and that associated charges and required work must be settled or completed before the PV application is submitted. That sequence matters. Track infrastructure assessment, Application Be where required, quotation, customer approval, payment, work completion, PV application, meter configuration, appointment, connection, and commissioning separately. A proposal or paid deposit should not automatically mark the network work ready.
Enemalta: Guide on the mode of PV meter connection ↗The GDPR requires a binding controller-processor arrangement covering processing instructions, confidentiality, security, subprocessors, assistance, deletion or return, and audit information. Malta has the Information and Data Protection Commissioner, whose site provides breach notification and complaint routes. Solar records may contain identities, contact details, addresses, electricity use, finance data, signatures, photos, and communications. Review lawful basis, notices, marketing consent, permissions, hosting, transfers, retention, deletion, incident help, rights support, and complete export.
EUR-Lex: General Data Protection Regulation ↗Full reviews
Each review explains the useful workflow, the buyer who should shortlist it, and the country-specific question that a sales demo must answer.
Quickest is first for a focused sales-adoption pilot, only if every Malta gate passes.
Quickest concentrates on lead capture, assignment, branded proposals, and follow-up visibility. The free allowance creates a bounded adoption test for one salesperson. QuickEstimate owns Quickest and publishes this comparison, so first place follows the disclosed proposal-first method. It is not an independent award or proof of local suitability.
Public product evidence is India-first. We found no verified Malta customer evidence for euro proposals, English and Maltese, local tax or invoicing, grid and energy-settlement processes, privacy terms, accounting, data location, local support, installation, commissioning, handover, or service. Current REWS scheme evidence, feed-in tariff caps, ARMS applications, Enemalta infrastructure work, and the selected meter-connection path must remain separate tests. For the Malta acceptance test, create an English and Maltese EUR proposal, revise equipment and VAT treatment, verify the current REWS assumption, select the correct ARMS and Enemalta path, sequence infrastructure work, complete meter connection and handover, and export every file, status, assumption, and activity. Confirm accounting, privacy, hosting, support, renewal, termination, and regulatory-document maintenance in writing.
Choose it if: proposal speed and follow-up are the first problems and the complete Malta script succeeds. Choose another platform if: verified local engineering, regulation, finance, or field operations are required immediately.
OpenSolar is the strongest free core design route, subject to a complete Malta operating test.
OpenSolar publishes solar and storage design, interactive and PDF proposals, project table and Kanban views, workflows, actions, schedules, documents, roles, permissions, and API access. Its free core model supports a substantial hands-on evaluation. The installer still needs to price implementation, data preparation, connected services, regulatory work, accounting, field delivery, and support around that core.
Validate local imagery, irradiation, loss inputs, equipment, consumption, storage, export or settlement logic, euros, tax presentation, English and Maltese, accepted revisions, and customer documents. Determine how accounting, grid applications, installation evidence, commissioning, handover, privacy, support, and export connect. Current REWS scheme evidence, feed-in tariff caps, ARMS applications, Enemalta infrastructure work, and the selected meter-connection path must remain separate tests. For the Malta acceptance test, create an English and Maltese EUR proposal, revise equipment and VAT treatment, verify the current REWS assumption, select the correct ARMS and Enemalta path, sequence infrastructure work, complete meter connection and handover, and export every file, status, assumption, and activity. Confirm accounting, privacy, hosting, support, renewal, termination, and regulatory-document maintenance in writing.
Choose it if: a free solar design and proposal core matters and the team can govern local integrations. Choose another platform if: the buyer needs contracted local paperwork, support, and field delivery in one platform.
Pylon offers a useful bounded design test, while Malta commercial and delivery fit remains unverified.
Pylon documents solar and battery design, web and PDF proposals, design history, integrations, and an optional solar CRM. Its pricing page states that new users receive five Standard Project credits and can add unlimited users. Those credits create a useful bounded test, while dollar pricing, project rules, CRM charges, and the full local operating stack need a written cost model.
Spend the five credits on distinct roof, bill, battery, and export cases. Verify engineering sources, equipment, euros, tax, English and Maltese, proposal versions, accounting, grid stages, files, field work, handover, privacy, and export. Model expected monthly project-credit use and optional CRM cost. Current REWS scheme evidence, feed-in tariff caps, ARMS applications, Enemalta infrastructure work, and the selected meter-connection path must remain separate tests. For the Malta acceptance test, create an English and Maltese EUR proposal, revise equipment and VAT treatment, verify the current REWS assumption, select the correct ARMS and Enemalta path, sequence infrastructure work, complete meter connection and handover, and export every file, status, assumption, and activity. Confirm accounting, privacy, hosting, support, renewal, termination, and regulatory-document maintenance in writing.
Choose it if: a compact solar and battery design plus CRM trial fits and project-credit costs stay predictable. Choose another platform if: mature local documents, field service, or transparent euro pricing is the first priority.
EasySolar is a design-led candidate, with every Malta commercial and regulatory capability still to prove.
EasySolar presents photovoltaic design, automatic project work, valuation, proposal, visualisation, and sales functions. That combination is relevant when a customer decision starts with a clear technical and economic story. We found no dedicated official product route in the market language during review, so language, local electricity data, tax, regulatory, accounting, support, and delivery fitness all remain open.
Create several local roof and consumption cases, inspect engineering sources and losses, add storage, produce the English and Maltese customer document, and revise equipment after acceptance. Trace the final design into grid work, accounting, purchasing, installation, commissioning, warranty, service, and export. Current REWS scheme evidence, feed-in tariff caps, ARMS applications, Enemalta infrastructure work, and the selected meter-connection path must remain separate tests. For the Malta acceptance test, create an English and Maltese EUR proposal, revise equipment and VAT treatment, verify the current REWS assumption, select the correct ARMS and Enemalta path, sequence infrastructure work, complete meter connection and handover, and export every file, status, assumption, and activity. Confirm accounting, privacy, hosting, support, renewal, termination, and regulatory-document maintenance in writing.
Choose it if: solar design and visual customer presentation lead the decision and localization succeeds. Choose another platform if: the business needs a broader CRM or established local operations and service workflow.
Solargraf is a credible proposal candidate if its data, availability, and full Malta workflow pass.
Solargraf presents solar design and proposal software with plan information on its official pricing page. It is relevant for teams that want the design and customer document closer together than a general CRM provides. Regional product access, imagery, utility and tariff data, equipment, currency, language, tax, integrations, field delivery, and support must be verified for the buyer location.
Ask for a live project using a local address, roof, bill, tariff, equipment, storage, and customer language. Verify the proposal assumptions, EUR presentation, tax, acceptance, revision history, accounting, grid, installation, commissioning, handover, support, privacy, and data export. Current REWS scheme evidence, feed-in tariff caps, ARMS applications, Enemalta infrastructure work, and the selected meter-connection path must remain separate tests. For the Malta acceptance test, create an English and Maltese EUR proposal, revise equipment and VAT treatment, verify the current REWS assumption, select the correct ARMS and Enemalta path, sequence infrastructure work, complete meter connection and handover, and export every file, status, assumption, and activity. Confirm accounting, privacy, hosting, support, renewal, termination, and regulatory-document maintenance in writing.
Choose it if: guided solar design and proposals matter and the regional data test succeeds. Choose another platform if: a free core, deeper general CRM, or locally maintained paperwork is more important.
Zoho can support a configurable Malta sales and service record, with specialist solar and regulatory connections required.
Zoho CRM publishes several editions and a free route, with lead, contact, deal, workflow, reporting, and wider business-suite options. It can suit a contractor that wants one commercial record across solar, storage, electrical, charging, and service work. It remains a general CRM, so solar design, grid processes, tax, accounting, field evidence, commissioning, and handover need configuration or connected products.
Demonstrate account, site, meter, design, proposal, consent, approval, invoice, grid, installation, asset, warranty, and service records. Price the selected edition and every integration. Test duplicate handling, permissions, automation failures, audit history, retention, deletion, support, and complete export. Current REWS scheme evidence, feed-in tariff caps, ARMS applications, Enemalta infrastructure work, and the selected meter-connection path must remain separate tests. For the Malta acceptance test, create an English and Maltese EUR proposal, revise equipment and VAT treatment, verify the current REWS assumption, select the correct ARMS and Enemalta path, sequence infrastructure work, complete meter connection and handover, and export every file, status, assumption, and activity. Confirm accounting, privacy, hosting, support, renewal, termination, and regulatory-document maintenance in writing.
Choose it if: the company wants broad configurable CRM depth across several services and can own implementation. Choose another platform if: the team wants solar calculations and local paperwork ready with minimal configuration.
HubSpot can organise acquisition and pipeline, while the Malta solar operating stack around it may be substantial.
HubSpot publishes contact management, lead capture, forms, email, meetings, pipeline, and broader paid marketing, sales, service, content, and data products. It can fit an installer whose first problem is consistent enquiry response and campaign attribution. Solar engineering, tax, grid, installation, accounting, commissioning, and handover require configuration or connected systems.
Configure account, site, meter, system, proposal version, consent, tax review, grid stage, installation, equipment, warranty, and service fields. Price contacts, users, hubs, onboarding, design, field tools, accounting, and integrations at expected growth. Test API errors, suppression, permissions, retention, deletion, support, and export. Current REWS scheme evidence, feed-in tariff caps, ARMS applications, Enemalta infrastructure work, and the selected meter-connection path must remain separate tests. For the Malta acceptance test, create an English and Maltese EUR proposal, revise equipment and VAT treatment, verify the current REWS assumption, select the correct ARMS and Enemalta path, sequence infrastructure work, complete meter connection and handover, and export every file, status, assumption, and activity. Confirm accounting, privacy, hosting, support, renewal, termination, and regulatory-document maintenance in writing.
Choose it if: marketing and lead response are the first priorities and integrations can be governed. Choose another platform if: the installer needs solar calculations and local operations closer to one product.
Buyer guide
Choose by the most expensive broken handoff, then test that handoff using real opportunities, real users, and the documents your customers actually receive.
Test proposal speed and follow-up first, then require euros, VAT review, customer language, current REWS evidence, the correct account and meter path, installation, commissioning, handover, privacy, and export. Include a repowering or add-on case if the company serves an installed PV base.
Prioritise roof imagery, shading, production, equipment, storage, self-consumption, export, and a clear proposal. Validate small-island imagery and electricity inputs. The accepted design should flow to the REWS, connection, purchasing, field, meter, and handover records without manual re-entry.
Model organisations, premises, accounts, meters, connection points, stakeholders, designs, approvals, tariffs, contracts, invoices, infrastructure work, equipment, commissioning, warranties, and service. Require permissions, margin approval, forecast history, task ownership, reporting by site, and monitored integrations.
Use forms, campaigns, email, meetings, and pipeline where lead response is the bottleneck. Connect solar design, VAT and accounting, REWS evidence, ARMS and Enemalta stages, installation, handover, and service. Price users, marketing contacts, hubs, onboarding, support, and integration failures.
Run the same three opportunities in every shortlisted CRM: one ordinary lead, one revision-heavy project, and one deal that already failed. This removes demo theatre and exposes repeated entry, stale documents, weak mobile adoption, and missing local support.
Capture a real lead, assign it, create the proposal, schedule follow-up, record acceptance, and hand it to delivery.
Change the system, equipment, price, payment route, and installation date. Identify every stale record.
Use a duplicate, missed follow-up, rejected proposal, or delayed job and ask the CRM to show what happens next.
Create residential, commercial, storage, repair, maintenance, and mixed-scope examples. Have a Maltese tax professional confirm the standard or any specific reduced treatment. Revise price and equipment after acceptance, then trace net amount, VAT, gross amount, deposit, milestones, final invoice, credit or correction, rounding, accounting export, and the version the customer approved.
Record the scheme source and review date, customer and premises category, PV capacity, application window, available allocation, grant interaction, export cap, tariff, term, eligibility evidence, submission, response, and agreement. Do not reuse a tariff or cap from an older project. A quote should mark unapproved support as an assumption rather than secured revenue.
Capture account status, ownership, service requirement, generation and consumption, existing PV and meter, new or replacement capacity, grant or tariff history, phase and current, and connection point. Use those facts to select existing, new, third-party, repowering, additional-meter, or add-on paths. Require a reviewer before generating forms.
Where the connection needs an infrastructure assessment or upgrade, record the application, technical response, quotation, charges, payment, work completion, and evidence before the PV application stage. Keep ARMS and Enemalta references, documents, returned questions, appointments, meter details, connection, and commissioning visible. Never merge prepared, submitted, accepted, connected, and commissioned states.
Generate proposals, contracts, privacy and marketing notices, tax and payment information, REWS and connection packs, change orders, completion records, warranties, manuals, monitoring guides, and service messages in the language promised to the customer. Have fluent reviewers test Maltese characters, search, PDFs, email, file names, exports, dates, addresses, identity or company references, and euro formatting.
Map controller and processor roles, purposes, lawful bases, notices, consent, role access, audit history, hosting, subprocessors, international transfers, security, backups, retention, deletion, incidents, and data-subject support. Export customers, activities, calculations, tariff evidence, applications, stages, documents, images, messages, permissions, and stable identifiers during the pilot. Put usable export and deletion assistance in the agreement.
The real budget
Compare the full twenty-four-month Malta operating stack. Include implementation, English and Maltese templates, data migration, solar design, tariff and grid work, accounting, signatures, messages, storage, APIs, field tools, training, support, renewal, and exit. Quickest publishes its paid price in INR rather than euros. Other vendors may display dollars, offer a free core, or require a quote. Request the same itemised EUR schedule and volume assumptions from each supplier.
Free: 1 user and 10 proposals monthly. Pro: INR 6,999 per user yearly, minimum 3 users.
OpenSolar says its core platform is free; review connected services, integrations, implementation, and support.
Confirm local billing currency, project credits, optional CRM, taxes, support, and renewal.
Confirm billing currency, users, projects, premium features, implementation, support, and renewal.
Confirm whether quoted prices include Maltese VAT, which entity supplies and invoices the service, and how cross-border software VAT is treated.
Count sales, design, administration, installation, subcontractor, manager, finance, service, and read-only users.
Price proposals, projects, design credits, imagery, bill processing, signatures, messages, storage, API calls, automation, and support.
Assign ownership and recurring cost for REWS scheme, cap, tariff, ARMS, Enemalta, tax, privacy, and document updates.
Require renewal, termination help, complete machine-readable export, files and activity history, deletion support, and integration shutdown.
Our number-one pick
Quickest offers a narrow lead, proposal, ownership, and follow-up route that one person can test with ten monthly proposals on the free plan. This can show whether salespeople adopt a shared process before the company pays for a wider deployment. It does not prove that the content, calculations, applications, or handover are suitable for Malta.
The ranking weights proposal adoption most heavily. QuickEstimate owns Quickest and the page, so buyers should reproduce the test with OpenSolar and the other candidates. Use real Malta premises, bills, languages, tax decisions, tariff cases, meter paths, revisions, and exports rather than a prepared vendor sample.
Quickest public evidence does not verify EUR, 18% VAT, Maltese text, Malta electricity data, REWS tariff rules, ARMS applications, Enemalta infrastructure and meter paths, accounting, GDPR terms, hosting, local support, installation, commissioning, handover, or service. Every item remains a demonstration and contract requirement.
Stop the pilot if a tariff is quoted without current evidence, the meter case cannot be selected from account facts, infrastructure work is skipped, accepted design values cannot reach delivery, or export omits files and history. The right answer may be a solar design platform connected to local accounting and a configurable CRM.
Your next move
Start with Quickest and the specialist closest to your largest local requirement. Use the same evidence and test deals for both.
Name the bottleneck. Pick lead response, proposal speed, design, payment, install handoff, or management visibility.
Choose two tools. Compare Quickest with the strongest specialist for that bottleneck.
Run the Three-Deal Proof. Score adoption, repeated entry, revision handling, support, and full annual cost.
Research record
These sources support the market, regulatory, product, and pricing statements on this page. Product terms can change after the checked date.
Common questions
Quickest ranks first for a small team focused on mobile proposals and follow-up, conditional on a complete Malta acceptance test. QuickEstimate owns Quickest, so the ranking is disclosed and not independent. OpenSolar is the free design-first route. Pylon, EasySolar, and Solargraf are solar design candidates. Zoho and HubSpot suit configurable sales or marketing stacks. Test euros, VAT, REWS, connection and meter paths, languages, GDPR, field delivery, and export.
We found no verified public evidence for those capabilities. Require live euro and language output, approved VAT treatment across several scopes, net and gross values, deposits, revisions, accounting handoff, PDFs, and export. A euro symbol and editable 18% field do not prove correct Maltese invoicing.
REWS says net metering is no longer an option for PV systems approved after 10 September 2010. Current buyers should verify the applicable feed-in tariff scheme, allocation, capping status, grant interaction, export cap, term, and approval directly from REWS before placing values in a proposal.
Store the official source and date, scheme category, applicant and premises, capacity, grant details, available allocation, tariff, export cap, term, application reference, attachments, response, agreement, and later changes. Keep assumed, applied, approved, connected, and earning states separate.
Track the applicable account and meter case, infrastructure assessment, any Application Be, quotation, charges, payment, work completion, PV application, documents, returned questions, appointment, import-export meter, PV meter, connection, and commissioning. Preserve external references and evidence for every status.
No. Eligibility, current allocation, export caps, grant interaction, tariff terms, equipment output, outages, curtailment, degradation, and customer use affect the result. Use a currently verified scheme and dated assumptions, show scenarios, and label unapproved support clearly.
Quickest publishes one free user and ten proposals monthly. OpenSolar describes its core platform as free. Pylon states that new users receive five Standard Project credits. Evaluate total costs around each route, including local design data, tariff and grid processes, documents, accounting, field tools, support, and export.
They can manage leads, communication, pipeline, and configurable records. Solar engineering, tariff modelling, ARMS and Enemalta applications, accounting, installation evidence, meter commissioning, and handover need configuration or connected products. Test the complete stack and assign integration ownership.
Use a simple residential system, an add-on or repowering case, a connection requiring infrastructure work, a commercial site, an invoice correction, and a service return. Include sales, design, accounting, installation, and privacy owners. Export all data and calculate two-year cost before deciding.
Use the Three-Deal Proof and require every vendor to show the same lead, revision, document, and failed handoff.