Solar workflow depth
Can the product carry system details, proposal status, project milestones, and the delivery handoff without rebuilding the process in custom fields?
Documentation-based comparison · Lithuania
8 best solar CRM platforms in Lithuania
Quickest Solar CRM ranks first for a proposal-first Lithuanian solar sales team under a disclosed adoption lens. Eight products are compared against EUR quotations, Lithuanian documents, ESO and the responsible connection process, VERT evidence, APVA support assumptions, tax, GDPR procurement, accounting, mobile installation, commissioning, warranty, and handover.
Direct answer
Which solar CRM is best in Lithuania?
Quickest Solar CRM is our first proposal-focused trial for a small Lithuanian installer that values mobile adoption, lead ownership, quotations, and follow-up. QuickEstimate publishes this page and sells Quickest, so the ranking is not independent. Quickest has no verified Lithuanian localisation in the reviewed public evidence. OpenSolar is the strongest free core design reference, Solar Monkey and EasySolar provide specialist design comparisons, Odoo supplies the broad operations candidate, and Reonic supplies a European multi-technology comparison.
8 jobs, 8 picks
The best solar CRM by use case
A useful shortlist starts with the sales or delivery bottleneck. Each winner below reflects a different buying priority, while the overall ranking rewards a CRM that a solar sales team can adopt quickly.
01Best proposal-first adoption trialQuickest Solar CRM
Small Lithuanian sales teams testing lead ownership, mobile quotations, follow-up, and pipeline discipline
These are India-facing public terms. EUR price, local tax, contract, support, and availability require written confirmation. 02Best free core solar designOpenSolarDesign-led residential installers that want an accessible specialist reference
External API access and supported connectors became paid from 16 April 2026. Local companion services can add cost. 03Best guided solar design workflowSolar MonkeyInstallers comparing specialist roof design, production calculations, and customer proposals
No dependable local plan total was used in this comparison. Confirm users, projects, services, tax, and renewal. 04Best flexible proposal and design comparisonEasySolarSmall design-led teams comparing solar calculations, branded proposals, and mobile work
The checked public page did not establish a complete local-currency order total for this comparison. 05Best usage-priced design optionPylonTeams with variable design volume that want proposals, battery modelling, install packs, and optional CRM
The official page uses a dollar symbol rather than EUR. Preserve that currency and request local tax and contract terms. 06Best configurable operations suiteOdooEPCs prioritising CRM, sales, procurement, inventory, projects, field service, invoicing, and accounting
Global pricing varies by region and term. Obtain a dated local implementation, hosting, support, and tax quote. 07Best configurable general CRMZoho CRMMarketing-led solar businesses with an administrator who can govern a connected local process
Confirm local paid pricing, tax, edition, WhatsApp charges, credits, support, and implementation. 08Best integrated European energy-platform comparisonReonicSolar and energy teams comparing planning, sales, customer options, and project workflow
Confirm country availability, users, modules, projects, services, support, data terms, tax, renewal, and exit.How we evaluated
The Lithuania Solar CRM Fit Test
Prepared Brave, Mojeek, and Qwant captures did not yield a defensible independent Lithuania-specific vendor order. Brave returned challenge pages, Mojeek returned shells or access errors, and Qwant returned application pages requiring client execution. Supplemental DuckDuckGo official searches also returned challenge responses. The bounded Grok run did not return a final verifiable result, so no X post is cited. We compare official vendor evidence against live grid, regulator, support, tax, and privacy sources. Quickest leads only under the disclosed proposal-first adoption method, and no numeric product scores are used.
Sales control
Can managers route leads, track activity, automate follow-up, forecast revenue, and see why an opportunity stalled?
Proposal and design
Can a rep move from site information to a credible customer proposal, and how much specialist solar design happens inside the platform?
Local transaction fit
Does the workflow support the language, currency, tax, communications, documents, and handoffs common in Lithuania?
Cost to adoption
What setup, migration, training, administration, and extra software does the apparent subscription require?
Evidence standard. This edition uses public product, pricing, regulatory, and market sources checked on 6 September 2026. A listed capability may depend on plan or configuration. We did not conduct hands-on tests, so we do not publish numerical product scores.
At-a-glance matrix
Compare the 8 best solar CRM platforms in Lithuania
The table separates CRM depth from proposal, design, and operations coverage. Confirm plan limits and country availability in writing before signing.
Quickest Solar CRMBest proposal-first adoption trial
- Best for
- Small Lithuanian sales teams testing lead ownership, mobile quotations, follow-up, and pipeline discipline
- Public price
- Free; Pro ₹6,999/user/year
- Proposal
- Focused solar proposals and customer sharing
- Design
- Proposal inputs rather than a verified local design engine
- Operations
- Leads, reminders, pipeline visibility, product records, and documents
- CRM depth
- Focused solar sales CRM
OpenSolarBest free core solar design
- Best for
- Design-led residential installers that want an accessible specialist reference
- Public price
- Core platform free
- Proposal
- Digital and PDF proposals with signatures
- Design
- Solar and battery design with imagery and financial presentation
- Operations
- Built-in CRM, projects, teams, payments, hardware, and add-ons
- CRM depth
- Built-in solar CRM
Solar MonkeyBest guided solar design workflow
- Best for
- Installers comparing specialist roof design, production calculations, and customer proposals
- Public price
- Request a local quote
- Proposal
- Customer proposal and sales presentation
- Design
- PV roof design, production, shading, and financial calculations
- Operations
- Sales workflow and project handoff around the design
- CRM depth
- Solar sales workflow rather than broad ERP
EasySolarBest flexible proposal and design comparison
- Best for
- Small design-led teams comparing solar calculations, branded proposals, and mobile work
- Public price
- Request a current quote
- Proposal
- Branded solar proposals and financial presentation
- Design
- PV design, production, shading, and financial tools
- Operations
- CRM and project-oriented functions around design and sales
- CRM depth
- Solar-oriented CRM functions
PylonBest usage-priced design option
- Best for
- Teams with variable design volume that want proposals, battery modelling, install packs, and optional CRM
- Public price
- $4 or $10/project; CRM from $49/user/month
- Proposal
- Web and PDF proposals with signatures
- Design
- Solar, battery, shading, interval-data, electrical, and financial tools
- Operations
- Job sheets, owner manuals, payments, integrations, and optional CRM
- CRM depth
- Optional solar CRM
OdooBest configurable operations suite
- Best for
- EPCs prioritising CRM, sales, procurement, inventory, projects, field service, invoicing, and accounting
- Public price
- One App Free; paid all-app plans
- Proposal
- Sales quotations, signatures, and invoices
- Design
- Requires a specialist solar design product
- Operations
- Broad office, warehouse, project, field, finance, document, and service suite
- CRM depth
- General CRM inside an ERP family
Zoho CRMBest configurable general CRM
- Best for
- Marketing-led solar businesses with an administrator who can govern a connected local process
- Public price
- Free edition for three users
- Proposal
- Generic CPQ and document functions by edition
- Design
- Requires specialist solar design software
- Operations
- Forms, pipelines, automation, approvals, portals, APIs, mobile apps, and integrations
- CRM depth
- Deep general CRM
ReonicBest integrated European energy-platform comparison
- Best for
- Solar and energy teams comparing planning, sales, customer options, and project workflow
- Public price
- Request a local quote
- Proposal
- Energy proposals and customer option presentation
- Design
- Solar, storage, heat-pump, charging, and economic planning
- Operations
- Connected sales and project workflow around energy design
- CRM depth
- Energy sales workflow
Local billing check: confirm EUR pricing, tax treatment, contract currency, and payment fees in writing.
| Platform | Best for | Public price | Solar proposals | Design | Project operations | CRM depth | Free access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Quickest Solar CRM | Small Lithuanian sales teams testing lead ownership, mobile quotations, follow-up, and pipeline discipline | Free; Pro ₹6,999/user/year | Focused solar proposals and customer sharing | Proposal inputs rather than a verified local design engine | Leads, reminders, pipeline visibility, product records, and documents | Focused solar sales CRM | One user and 10 proposals monthly |
| 2OpenSolar | Design-led residential installers that want an accessible specialist reference | Core platform free | Digital and PDF proposals with signatures | Solar and battery design with imagery and financial presentation | Built-in CRM, projects, teams, payments, hardware, and add-ons | Built-in solar CRM | Core platform is free |
| 3Solar Monkey | Installers comparing specialist roof design, production calculations, and customer proposals | Request a local quote | Customer proposal and sales presentation | PV roof design, production, shading, and financial calculations | Sales workflow and project handoff around the design | Solar sales workflow rather than broad ERP | Demo or vendor trial |
| 4EasySolar | Small design-led teams comparing solar calculations, branded proposals, and mobile work | Request a current quote | Branded solar proposals and financial presentation | PV design, production, shading, and financial tools | CRM and project-oriented functions around design and sales | Solar-oriented CRM functions | Trial terms require confirmation |
| 5Pylon | Teams with variable design volume that want proposals, battery modelling, install packs, and optional CRM | $4 or $10/project; CRM from $49/user/month | Web and PDF proposals with signatures | Solar, battery, shading, interval-data, electrical, and financial tools | Job sheets, owner manuals, payments, integrations, and optional CRM | Optional solar CRM | Five Standard project credits for new users |
| 6Odoo | EPCs prioritising CRM, sales, procurement, inventory, projects, field service, invoicing, and accounting | One App Free; paid all-app plans | Sales quotations, signatures, and invoices | Requires a specialist solar design product | Broad office, warehouse, project, field, finance, document, and service suite | General CRM inside an ERP family | One app with unlimited users |
| 7Zoho CRM | Marketing-led solar businesses with an administrator who can govern a connected local process | Free edition for three users | Generic CPQ and document functions by edition | Requires specialist solar design software | Forms, pipelines, automation, approvals, portals, APIs, mobile apps, and integrations | Deep general CRM | Free edition for three users |
| 8Reonic | Solar and energy teams comparing planning, sales, customer options, and project workflow | Request a local quote | Energy proposals and customer option presentation | Solar, storage, heat-pump, charging, and economic planning | Connected sales and project workflow around energy design | Energy sales workflow | Demo available |
Pricing and capability labels were checked against official sources on 6 September 2026. Currency conversion is intentionally omitted where a vendor does not publish a local price.
Country research
A Lithuanian solar CRM must preserve grid, support, tax, privacy, field, and handover evidence
A reliable Lithuanian record connects customer, property, Lithuanian quotation, survey, design, equipment, EUR price revision, responsible network actor, connection evidence, support assumption, tax decision, installation, meter, commissioning, invoice, payment, privacy choices, warranties, service, and handover. Every portal remains a governed handoff until a tested integration proves otherwise.
ESO is Lithuania's electricity and gas distribution operator and provides the public starting point for network connection and prosumer services. A CRM should preserve the actual site, customer, requested capacity, connection terms, submitted design, reference, technical response, costs, dates, conditions, corrections, meter, commissioning, and completion evidence. No shortlisted vendor is assumed to submit directly without a live test.
Energijos skirstymo operatorius: ESO ↗VERT is Lithuania's national energy regulator and publishes electricity-market, network, tariff, and consumer information. Store the applicable rule, producer or consumer category, network actor, tariff or settlement source, effective date, reviewer, complaint, decision, and correspondence. A generic CRM status cannot prove regulatory correctness or preserve why a commercial assumption was accepted.
VERT: National Energy Regulatory Council ↗APVA is Lithuania's Environmental Projects Management Agency and publishes current support calls and programme information. Software can organize an estimate and application record but cannot guarantee eligibility, funding, approval, amount, or payment. Record the call, source, effective date, applicant, property, capacity, equipment, documents, submission, response, conditions, correction, payment, and adviser review.
APVA: Environmental Projects Management Agency ↗The State Tax Inspectorate is Lithuania's official tax authority. A solar contract may combine equipment, design, electrical and building work, installation, storage, maintenance, discounts, deposits, milestone invoices, corrections, and credit notes. Ask a Lithuanian tax adviser to approve VAT, classifications, timing, invoice fields, records, and accounting export rather than relying on one universal switch.
State Tax Inspectorate: State Tax Inspectorate ↗The State Data Protection Inspectorate is Lithuania's national privacy supervisory authority. A solar CRM holds identities, addresses, energy data, property images, designs, signatures, payments, staff records, and messages. Review purpose, notice, legal basis, permissions, processors, subprocessors, hosting, support access, transfers, safeguards, incidents, retention, rights, deletion, and full export.
State Data Protection Inspectorate: State Data Protection Inspectorate ↗Full reviews
Why each solar CRM earns its place
Each review explains the useful workflow, the buyer who should shortlist it, and the country-specific question that a sales demo must answer.
01
Quickest pricing ↗Q
Best proposal-first adoption trial
Quickest Solar CRM
Quickest ranks first under our proposal-first adoption lens, but every Lithuanian capability remains unverified until the buyer completes the published acceptance test.
Ranking lensProposal-first adoptionLocal proofNot established publiclyFree accessOne user, 10 proposals monthly
Quickest concentrates lead capture, ownership, proposal creation, customer sharing, follow-up reminders, pipeline stages, activity visibility, product records, and team oversight in one sales path. A contained trial can show whether representatives stop using disconnected spreadsheets, message threads, and manually edited quotation files.
QuickEstimate publishes this page and sells Quickest, so the rank is not independent. Public product proof is India-first, including rupee pricing, Indian workflows, customer evidence, and Mumbai hosting. It does not prove EUR and Lithuanian VAT, Lithuanian documents, ESO connection work, VERT rules, APVA support evidence, prosumer and storage assumptions, GDPR terms, local accounting, payments, field installation and handover. Unsupported speed, conversion, revenue, or return claims are excluded from this comparison.
Why shortlist it
- Focused lead-to-proposal-to-follow-up path
- Free access supports a controlled adoption trial
- Mobile-first positioning may suit field sales
Check before buying
- Demonstrate EUR and Lithuanian VAT, Lithuanian documents, ESO connection work, VERT rules, APVA support evidence, prosumer and storage assumptions, GDPR terms, local accounting, payments, field installation and handover
- Review contracting entity, processors, hosting, transfers, security, deletion, and export
- Run representative jobs from redacted lead through handover
Choose it if: proposal adoption and lead ownership are the immediate bottlenecks and every Lithuanian acceptance gate passes. Choose another platform if: verified local accounting, regulatory, design, or delivery breadth is required before a sales trial.
02
OpenSolar Pro ↗OS
Best free core solar design
OpenSolar
OpenSolar is the strongest free core design reference, while its Lithuanian regulatory, tax, language, accounting, and field fit still requires proof.
Core priceFreePaid changeExternal connectivity from April 2026ScopeDesign, sell, manage
OpenSolar connects site data, equipment, production assumptions, pricing, solar and battery design, customer proposals, signatures, CRM records, and internal project workflow. Its free core is a credible benchmark against every paid platform. Test imagery, tariffs, export treatment, documents, and service availability with real Lithuanian projects.
Why shortlist it
- Broad free core for design, proposals, CRM, and projects
- Solar and battery presentation with signature support
- Useful benchmark before buying another platform
Check before buying
- Verify EUR and Lithuanian VAT, Lithuanian documents, ESO connection work, VERT rules, APVA support evidence, prosumer and storage assumptions, GDPR terms, local accounting, payments, field installation and handover
- Price every API, connector, imagery, payment, finance, message, and support dependency
- Test field work, handover, history, and full export
Choose it if: free core design and customer presentation are central and the surrounding local stack is clearly owned. Choose another platform if: the company needs verified local accounting, offline installation work, or a lighter sales-only rollout.
03
Solar Monkey platform ↗SM
Best guided solar design workflow
Solar Monkey
Solar Monkey deserves a design-led trial, but the buyer must prove exact Lithuanian document, tariff, grid, tax, privacy, integration, and handover behaviour.
CategoryPV design and salesLocal priceRequest quoteAccountingVerify connection
Solar Monkey presents a workflow from roof and system design through production and financial calculations to a customer proposal. This can reduce the gap between a survey, a sales option, and an accepted technical concept. The public page does not prove every Lithuanian authority, tax, accounting, language, field, or data requirement, so run a complete local job rather than relying on a polished demonstration.
Why shortlist it
- Specialist PV design and proposal focus
- Connects production and financial presentation
- Relevant European installer positioning
Check before buying
- Verify EUR and Lithuanian VAT, Lithuanian documents, ESO connection work, VERT rules, APVA support evidence, prosumer and storage assumptions, GDPR terms, local accounting, payments, field installation and handover
- Test local imagery, equipment, tariffs, batteries, and accepted-document versioning
- Obtain price, implementation, support, security, and exit terms
Choose it if: design and proposal quality are the main constraints and local acceptance testing passes. Choose another platform if: a free core, deep accounting, inventory, or broad service operation matters more.
04
EasySolar platform ↗ES
Best flexible proposal and design comparison
EasySolar
EasySolar offers a useful specialist comparison for design and proposals, subject to a full Lithuanian localisation, calculation, privacy, and field test.
CategoryDesign and proposalsLocal totalRequest quoteLocal proofAcceptance test required
EasySolar publishes solar design, production and financial calculations, branded proposals, and business workflow functions aimed at installers. Evaluate the exact current edition and avoid assuming that a translated interface supplies local regulation. Use Lithuanian bills, equipment, tariffs, taxes, documents, addresses, signatures, and handover records throughout the trial.
Why shortlist it
- Solar-specific design and proposal scope
- Financial presentation can support option comparison
- Useful second specialist design reference
Check before buying
- Verify EUR and Lithuanian VAT, Lithuanian documents, ESO connection work, VERT rules, APVA support evidence, prosumer and storage assumptions, GDPR terms, local accounting, payments, field installation and handover
- Check calculation inputs, document languages, revision history, and audit trail
- Confirm plan limits, support, security, integrations, and export
Choose it if: the team wants a flexible solar proposal and design comparison and can validate every local assumption. Choose another platform if: free design access, deep operations, or verified local fiscal support is the main requirement.
05
Pylon pricing ↗P
Best usage-priced design option
Pylon
Pylon offers low-commitment design pricing, provided its Australian cues and all Lithuanian assumptions, documents, integrations, and support terms pass review.
Standard$4 per projectPro$10 per projectCRMFrom $49 per user monthly
Pylon publishes imagery, panel placement, shading, solar and battery design, interval-data analysis, financial projections, proposals, signatures, electrical documents, job sheets, owner manuals, integrations, and an optional sales CRM. Usage pricing can fit variable design volume. Several outputs and examples are Australian, so replace them with controlled Lithuanian inputs before judging fit.
Why shortlist it
- Transparent per-project design model
- Broad proposal, battery, and project-document scope
- Optional CRM avoids a fixed sales subscription
Check before buying
- Verify EUR and Lithuanian VAT, Lithuanian documents, ESO connection work, VERT rules, APVA support evidence, prosumer and storage assumptions, GDPR terms, local accounting, payments, field installation and handover
- Confirm currency, EUR invoice, tax, limits, support, and total cost
- Test installation, handover, integrations, and full export
Choose it if: design volume varies and the team wants project-priced solar and battery proposals. Choose another platform if: verified fiscal localisation, a free core, or broad ERP operations are more important.
06
Odoo pricing ↗O
Best configurable operations suite
Odoo
Odoo covers broad operations, but no country-specific accounting documentation was captured for Lithuania; fiscal, solar, grid, and field configuration require an accountable local implementation.
FreeOne app, unlimited usersSolar designSeparate product requiredLocal accountingVerify with accountant
Odoo combines CRM, sales, quotations, signatures, accounting, invoicing, purchasing, inventory, documents, projects, planning, field service, help desk, marketing, and reporting. That breadth can reduce duplicate records across an established EPC. The checked official material did not establish a dedicated Lithuanian fiscal package, specialist PV design, ESO and the responsible connection process, APVA automation, or production-ready Lithuanian documents in the purchased configuration.
Why shortlist it
- Broad CRM-to-accounting and field-service scope
- Inventory, purchasing, projects, invoices, and documents can share records
- One App Free supports a narrow test
Check before buying
- Have a local accountant validate tax, invoices, records, and export
- Define specialist solar design, ESO and the responsible connection process, and APVA ownership
- Price implementation, hosting, custom work, support, and maintenance
Choose it if: local accounting documentation and broad operational control justify a managed ERP implementation. Choose another platform if: the immediate need is a quick proposal rollout or specialist PV design without an ERP project.
07
Zoho CRM pricing ↗Z
Best configurable general CRM
Zoho CRM
Zoho CRM can govern a configurable sales process, but the installer must own every Lithuanian solar, accounting, regulatory, privacy, and field connection.
Free editionThree usersDesignSeparate productLocal totalConfirm directly
Zoho CRM publishes leads, contacts, activities, forms, pipelines, email, mobile apps, imports and exports, reports, APIs, workflow automation, custom modules, approvals, inventory, portals, journeys, forecasting, and security controls across editions. That breadth suits formal sales governance. It does not remove the need for specialist design, local accounting, energy workflows, field delivery, and controlled document templates in Lithuania.
Why shortlist it
- Broad configurable pipeline and automation
- Free edition for three users
- Custom modules can support a governed process
Check before buying
- Verify EUR and Lithuanian VAT, Lithuanian documents, ESO connection work, VERT rules, APVA support evidence, prosumer and storage assumptions, GDPR terms, local accounting, payments, field installation and handover
- Map every design, accounting, messaging, signature, field, and authority connection
- Test permissions, deletion, audit history, and complete export
Choose it if: general CRM depth and marketing automation matter and the company can fund a system owner. Choose another platform if: the team wants solar design, local authority stages, accounting, and handover with less custom work.
08
Reonic platform ↗R
Best integrated European energy-platform comparison
Reonic
Reonic offers broad European energy-planning evidence, but exact Lithuanian authority, tax, accounting, language, field, and support behaviour remains an acceptance test.
ScopeMultiple energy technologiesLocal priceRequest quoteLocal proofVerify directly
Reonic presents solar, battery, heat-pump, charging, financial, sales, and project functions in one energy-platform proposition. That breadth can help a contractor selling more than PV. A European position does not prove each Lithuanian grid operator, support scheme, document, tax case, accounting export, privacy term, mobile workflow, or installation handover, so test them explicitly.
Why shortlist it
- Broad energy-technology planning proposition
- Connects customer options with project workflow
- Relevant European market focus
Check before buying
- Verify EUR and Lithuanian VAT, Lithuanian documents, ESO connection work, VERT rules, APVA support evidence, prosumer and storage assumptions, GDPR terms, local accounting, payments, field installation and handover
- Test local language output, authorities, tariffs, equipment, and accounting
- Confirm price, data terms, support, migration, and complete export
Choose it if: the company sells several energy technologies and wants a connected planning and sales comparison. Choose another platform if: a free core, broad ERP accounting, or a lighter proposal-only rollout matters more.
Buyer guide
How should a Lithuanian solar company choose a CRM?
Choose by the most expensive broken handoff, then test that handoff using real opportunities, real users, and the documents your customers actually receive.
Small proposal-first installerTrial Quickest beside OpenSolar
Quickest tests focused adoption, while OpenSolar provides a free core design reference. Both require complete Lithuanian document, tax, grid, support, privacy, field, accounting, and handover proof.
Design-led residential teamCompare Solar Monkey and EasySolar
Use the same Lithuanian roof, equipment, production, tariff, battery, EUR, Lithuanian document, and revision case. Verify how accepted design data reaches the network actor and field team.
Variable-volume design teamTest Pylon against OpenSolar
Pylon publishes project pricing and an optional CRM. OpenSolar provides a free core. Preserve foreign currencies, price connectors, and test local calculations, documents, field records, and support.
Finance and operations-led EPCCompare Odoo with the current accounting stack
Odoo covers CRM, sales, procurement, inventory, projects, field service, invoicing, and accounting. It requires specialist solar design and deliberate local fiscal, grid, support, and handover configuration.
Multi-technology or configurable sellerCompare Reonic and Zoho CRM
Reonic supplies a European solar, battery, heat-pump, and charging proposition. Zoho supplies configurable general CRM depth. Both need exact local workflow, price, data, language, and integration proof.
The Three-Deal Proof
Run the same three opportunities in every shortlisted CRM: one ordinary lead, one revision-heavy project, and one deal that already failed. This removes demo theatre and exposes repeated entry, stale documents, weak mobile adoption, and missing local support.
- 1Run the clean deal
Capture a real lead, assign it, create the proposal, schedule follow-up, record acceptance, and hand it to delivery.
- 2Change the assumptions
Change the system, equipment, price, payment route, and installation date. Identify every stale record.
- 3Recreate a failure
Use a duplicate, missed follow-up, rejected proposal, or delayed job and ask the CRM to show what happens next.
10 requirements to verify in Lithuania
Lithuanian quotation and contract journey
Create forms, quotations, options, terms, signatures, reminders, invoices, warranties, and handover documents in Lithuanian. Test local addresses, names, characters, dates, decimals, units, totals, exclusions, safety text, and reviewed technical language.
EUR, VAT, and accounting
Build residential, commercial, battery, and service quotations with equipment, labour, design, deposits, milestones, changes, discounts, credits, and cancellation. Have the local tax adviser and accountant approve VAT decisions, invoice output, records, and export.
Network connection ownership
Use ESO and the responsible connection process with the current forms and responsible person. Store request, capacity, design files, reference, technical response, costs, conditions, dates, corrections, meter, commissioning, approval, and completion. Test manual fallback.
VERT rule versions
Record the applicable rule, customer or producer category, network actor, tariff and settlement source, effective date, reviewer, technical conditions, complaint, decision, and correspondence. Preserve the accepted commercial and technical version.
APVA support evidence
Store the exact programme or call, source, effective date, applicant, property, capacity, equipment, calculation, documents, window, submission, response, conditions, correction, and payment. Keep every amount provisional until accepted.
PV, battery, and financial assumptions
Use local bills or interval data, roof and shading inputs, equipment, production, self-use, export, battery dispatch, degradation, losses, tariff, finance, and uncertainty. Preserve every accepted calculation with source and date.
GDPR, processors, and transfers
Map purposes and data flows. Review notices, legal basis, permissions, processors, subprocessors, storage and backup regions, support access, transfers, safeguards, security, incidents, retention, rights, deletion, and export.
Payments and document delivery
Test the actual bank, card, payment, e-invoice, email, signature, and messaging tools used by the business. Verify EUR settlement, fees, reconciliation, delivery status, corrections, attachments, consent, archive, and audit history.
Low-signal installation and commissioning
At a low-signal site, open the approved scope, capture survey and safety checks, photos, serials, deviations, tests, defects, signatures, meter and commissioning evidence, then reconnect and confirm clean sync and access removal.
Migration, integrations, and exit
Import duplicate contacts, multi-site customers, activities, documents, permissions, products, and tax codes. Test design, accounting, calendar, signature, payment, messages, and authority handoffs, then export files, records, and complete history.
Contract rule: A country name on a vendor website does not prove that local billing, documents, integrations, support hours, or regulatory workflows are included in your plan. Put each required capability in the order form.
The real budget
What does solar CRM software cost in Lithuania?
Compare a three-year EUR ownership cost across users, design volume, imagery, signatures, messages, payments, APIs, connectors, storage, Lithuanian templates, onboarding, migration, configuration, training, support, security review, renewal, and exit. Preserve every foreign currency instead of converting it into a false local quote. Tax inclusion and contracting entity must be explicit.
These are India-facing public terms. EUR price, local tax, contract, support, and availability require written confirmation.
External API access and supported connectors became paid from 16 April 2026. Local companion services can add cost.
No dependable local plan total was used in this comparison. Confirm users, projects, services, tax, and renewal.
The checked public page did not establish a complete local-currency order total for this comparison.
Quickest publishes one free user with 10 proposals monthly and Pro at ₹6,999 per user yearly with a three-user minimum. These are Indian terms. Confirm EUR, Lithuanian tax, contract, payment, hosting, support, Lithuanian output, integrations, renewal, and every local workflow.
OpenSolar says its core platform remains free, while external API access and supported connectors became paid in April 2026. Price imagery, finance, payments, messages, hardware, premium services, support, and each connection in the proposed stack.
Pylon lists $4 and $10 per design project plus optional CRM from $49 per user monthly. Preserve that dollar symbol and obtain EUR tax, payment, support, renewal, and contract terms rather than publishing a converted price.
Solar Monkey, EasySolar, and Reonic need current Lithuania quotes for intended users, modules, designs, data, services, onboarding, support, tax, and renewal. Do not infer a local order form from a European or translated page.
Odoo offers One App Free and paid all-app plans, while Zoho CRM publishes a free edition for three users. Obtain dated Lithuania quotes covering implementation, fiscal configuration, hosting, connectors, training, support, maintenance, and exit.
Our number-one pick
Why Quickest Solar CRM ranks first in Lithuania
Quickest ranks first because this comparison gives the greatest weight to proposal-first value and adoption for a small Lithuanian solar sales team. A focused path from lead ownership to quotation, follow-up, and pipeline review can solve the first operating problem before a business funds a larger design or ERP implementation. Its free plan supports a controlled trial with redacted records.
The commercial relationship and limitation are explicit. QuickEstimate publishes the page and sells Quickest, so the rank is not independent. Public product evidence is India-first and does not prove EUR and Lithuanian VAT, Lithuanian documents, ESO connection work, VERT rules, APVA support evidence, prosumer and storage assumptions, GDPR terms, local accounting, payments, field installation and handover. Unsupported speed, conversion, revenue, or return figures do not support the recommendation.
The trial should begin with a redacted lead and finish with an exported handover. Create and revise a EUR quotation, have tax output approved, attach the accepted design, run ESO and the responsible connection process, record the applicable VERT and APVA evidence, test Lithuanian documents, capture commissioning, invoice, payment, warranty, and service, then export files plus activity history.
Choose another product when it wins the actual bottleneck. OpenSolar supplies the free core design reference. Solar Monkey, EasySolar, and Pylon offer specialist design paths. Odoo provides broad configurable operations. Zoho CRM provides general sales control. Reonic adds a European multi-technology planning and sales comparison.
- Proposal generator for fast branded PDFs
- Pipeline management for lead stages and ownership
- Sales reports for team and conversion visibility
Why it wins
Ranking lensProposal-first value and adoption
IndependencePublisher sells Quickest
Lithuania readinessUnverified in public evidence
Public free accessOne user and 10 proposals monthly
Your next move
Build a two-product shortlist this week
Start with Quickest and the specialist closest to your largest local requirement. Use the same evidence and test deals for both.
01
Name the bottleneck. Pick lead response, proposal speed, design, payment, install handoff, or management visibility.
02
Choose two tools. Compare Quickest with the strongest specialist for that bottleneck.
03
Run the Three-Deal Proof. Score adoption, repeated entry, revision handling, support, and full annual cost.
Research record
Sources checked for this comparison
These sources support the market, regulatory, product, and pricing statements on this page. Product terms can change after the checked date.
- ESOEnergijos skirstymo operatorius · checked 6 Sep 2026
- National Energy Regulatory CouncilVERT · checked 6 Sep 2026
- Environmental Projects Management AgencyAPVA · checked 6 Sep 2026
- State Tax InspectorateState Tax Inspectorate · checked 6 Sep 2026
- State Data Protection InspectorateState Data Protection Inspectorate · checked 6 Sep 2026
- Quickest pricingQuickEstimate · checked 6 Sep 2026
- OpenSolar ProOpenSolar · checked 6 Sep 2026
- OpenSolar external connectivity pricingOpenSolar · checked 6 Sep 2026
- Solar Monkey platformSolar Monkey · checked 6 Sep 2026
- EasySolar platformEasySolar · checked 6 Sep 2026
- Pylon pricingPylon · checked 6 Sep 2026
- Odoo pricingOdoo · checked 6 Sep 2026
- Zoho CRM pricingZoho · checked 6 Sep 2026
- Reonic platformReonic · checked 6 Sep 2026
Common questions
Frequently asked questions about solar CRM in Lithuania
What is the best solar CRM in Lithuania?
Quickest is our first proposal-focused trial under a declared adoption lens. QuickEstimate sells Quickest, so the ranking is not independent, and Lithuanian localisation is unverified. Test EUR, VAT, Lithuanian, the network process, regulator rules, support evidence, GDPR, accounting, installation, commissioning, and export. OpenSolar is the free core design reference, while Odoo and Reonic address broader operations from different directions.
Can Quickest submit a Lithuanian grid connection automatically?
No public evidence reviewed proves direct Quickest submission through ESO and the responsible connection process. Treat the route as an acceptance test. Demonstrate current fields, credentials, attachments, consent, submission, reference, status, correction, manual fallback, audit history, and export. Keep a named person responsible and use redacted records until the workflow and processor terms are proven.
Can CRM software guarantee support from APVA?
No. Software can organize an estimate, application, documents, deadlines, status, conditions, and payment evidence, but it cannot guarantee eligibility, budget, approval, amount, or timing. Record the exact APVA programme or call, source, effective date, applicant, property, capacity, calculation, adviser, submission, response, and accepted documents. Preserve customer proposals if terms change.
Does a Lithuanian solar CRM need Lithuanian documents?
The required language depends on customers, staff, contracts, and authorities. Test Lithuanian for forms, quotations, terms, signatures, invoices, warranty, safety, and handover where relevant. A fluent technical and contractual reviewer should inspect characters, units, decimal formats, totals, exclusions, payment, PDF, mobile sharing, search, and export. A translated interface does not prove accurate documents.
Which CRM is best for solar design in Lithuania?
OpenSolar is the strongest free core design reference in this list. Solar Monkey, EasySolar, and Pylon provide other specialist design and proposal paths. Test each with the same Lithuanian roof, imagery, equipment, bill or interval data, tariff, self-use, export, battery, tax, language, and accepted-document revision. Design output still needs qualified technical review and a controlled grid handoff.
Which platform is best for Lithuanian solar accounting?
No product receives an automatic local accounting recommendation here. Odoo provides broad finance and operations modules, while Zoho and the specialist tools may connect to an existing accounting product. Have the business's accountant test taxes, deposits, partial and final invoices, corrections, credit notes, payments, reconciliation, reports, archive, permissions, and complete export in the exact purchased edition.
What should a Lithuanian installer test for GDPR?
Map customer, property, energy, photo, signature, finance, employee, supplier, and message data. Review purpose, notice, legal basis, permissions, controller and processor terms, subprocessors, hosting, backup, support access, international transfers, safeguards, incidents, retention, access and correction, deletion, and export. Quickest's public Mumbai hosting needs a specific local legal and processor review.
How should a Lithuanian installer compare CRM cost?
Model three years in EUR across users, designs, imagery, signatures, messages, payments, APIs, connectors, storage, local-language templates, onboarding, migration, configuration, training, support, security review, renewal, and exit. Preserve published INR, USD, or dollar-symbol prices rather than converting them into a false local quote. Require a dated order form and implementation scope for the exact edition.
Still deciding?
Take the comparison into your next vendor demo.
Use the Three-Deal Proof and require every vendor to show the same lead, revision, document, and failed handoff.