Solar workflow depth
Can the product carry system details, proposal status, project milestones, and the delivery handoff without rebuilding the process in custom fields?
Quickest Solar CRM is our first pick for a small Bosnian installer whose immediate problem is slow quoting and follow up that nobody owns. That placement uses a disclosed proposal-first adoption lens and still requires a Bosnia and Herzegovina proof step. OpenSolar is the clearest free design-first option, Pylon pairs design with an optional CRM, and Sunbase publishes wider solar operations. We compared seven tools against BAM documents, a layered regulatory structure, entity-level utilities and rules, indirect tax administration, connection stages, seasonal climate and handover.
Direct answer
Choose Quickest when proposal speed, lead ownership, field adoption and a free pilot are the first priorities. QuickEstimate owns Quickest and its published evidence is India-first, so Bosnian currency, indirect tax handling, entity routing, connection tracking, language output, hosting and support all remain unverified until a demo proves them. OpenSolar is better when free solar design leads the purchase. The defining local requirement is jurisdiction routing: the applicable regulator, utility and rules all depend on which entity a site sits in, and a CRM that assumes one of each will misroute work.
7 jobs, 7 picks
A useful shortlist starts with the sales or delivery bottleneck. Each winner below reflects a different buying priority, while the overall ranking rewards a CRM that a solar sales team can adopt quickly.
Small mobile sales teams
Free: 1 user and 10 proposals monthly. Pro: INR 6,999 per user yearly, minimum 3 users. 02Best free design-first optionOpenSolarStartups combining solar design, proposals and project CRM
OpenSolar says partners fund the model; review services and connected costs. 03Best compact design and CRM trialPylonTeams wanting solar and battery proposals with optional CRM
New users receive five Standard Project credits; confirm Bosnia commercial terms. 04Best broad solar operations candidateSunbaseEstablished teams evaluating a wider solar sales and project platform
Request Bosnia users, modules, implementation, integrations, support and renewal pricing. 05Best configurable general CRMZoho CRMTeams with an administrator and several sales or service lines
The reviewed global page publishes USD prices and adds local taxes. 06Best configurable operations suiteOdooBusinesses joining CRM with sales, inventory, field service and accounting
Confirm current plan, apps, users, hosting, implementation, localisation and customisation. 07Best for marketing-led acquisitionHubSpot CRMTeams prioritising forms, email, meetings and pipeline
Official page states up to 2 free users and 1,000 contacts; price all required hubs.How we evaluated
We saved English, Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian search attempts across Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Brave and Mojeek, then traced one record from an enquiry through site visit, consumption assessment, quotation, deposit, design, licensed electrical work, the entity-level regulatory route and the applicable utility connection process, procurement, installation, meter change, commissioning, invoicing, handover and service. Ranking rewards focused sales adoption first, then solar design, operational breadth, field usability, finance fit and configurable CRM depth. Facts come from the State Electricity Regulatory Commission, the Indirect Taxation Authority and Elektroprivreda BiH.
Can the product carry system details, proposal status, project milestones, and the delivery handoff without rebuilding the process in custom fields?
Can managers route leads, track activity, automate follow-up, forecast revenue, and see why an opportunity stalled?
Can a rep move from site information to a credible customer proposal, and how much specialist solar design happens inside the platform?
Does the workflow support the language, currency, tax, communications, documents, and handoffs common in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
What setup, migration, training, administration, and extra software does the apparent subscription require?
At-a-glance matrix
The table separates CRM depth from proposal, design, and operations coverage. Confirm plan limits and country availability in writing before signing.
Local billing check: confirm BAM pricing, tax treatment, contract currency, and payment fees in writing.
| Platform | Best for | Public price | Solar proposals | Design | Project operations | CRM depth | Free access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Quickest Solar CRM | Small mobile sales teams | Free plan; Pro in INR | Focused branded proposals | Bosnia inputs unverified | Lead stages and follow up | Focused solar sales CRM | 1 user, 10 proposals monthly |
| 2OpenSolar | Startups combining solar design, proposals and project CRM | Free core platform | Interactive and PDF proposals | Native solar and storage design | Project CRM, tasks, schedules and files | Solar project CRM | Core platform described as free |
| 3Pylon | Teams wanting solar and battery proposals with optional CRM | Dollar pricing shown; confirm currency | Web and PDF proposals | Solar and battery design | Optional solar CRM and integrations | Solar CRM available | Five Standard Project credits |
| 4Sunbase | Established teams evaluating a wider solar sales and project platform | Quote required | Solar proposal capabilities published | Connect or verify design scope | Sales and operational solar workflows | Broad solar CRM | Request demo and trial terms |
| 5Zoho CRM | Teams with an administrator and several sales or service lines | Free for 3 users; paid USD tiers | Configure CPQ or connect a proposal tool | Specialist solar tool required | Custom modules, workflow, reports, portals and APIs | Broad general CRM | Free edition for 3 users |
| 6Odoo | Businesses joining CRM with sales, inventory, field service and accounting | One app free; paid plans published | Sales quotations and signatures | Specialist solar design required | CRM, sales, inventory, accounting, field service and more | General CRM within modular ERP | One app free plan stated |
| 7HubSpot CRM | Teams prioritising forms, email, meetings and pipeline | Free CRM; paid hubs available | Connect or configure proposal software | Specialist solar tool required | Paid sales and service expansion | Broad customer platform | Up to 2 users and 1,000 contacts |
Pricing and capability labels were checked against official sources on Sep 7, 2026. Currency conversion is intentionally omitted where a vendor does not publish a local price.
Country research
Bosnia and Herzegovina has a layered energy governance structure: a state-level regulator alongside entity-level regulators, and more than one electricity utility serving different parts of the country. For an installer selling across the whole territory, that means the applicable regulator, the connection counterparty and the customer generation rules are all properties of the site rather than of the company. A CRM that assumes one regulator, one utility and one rule set will misroute applications and produce proposals describing arrangements the customer cannot actually get.
The State Electricity Regulatory Commission operates at state level alongside entity-level regulators, so more than one body may be relevant depending on the site and the project. Store the applicable regulator, the rule or decision version relied on, the reference, the capacity band, the effective period, the conditions, the checked date and the person who confirmed it, and treat the regulator as a controlled field rather than an assumption.
State Electricity Regulatory Commission: State Electricity Regulatory Commission ↗Elektroprivreda BiH is one of several electricity utilities serving different parts of the country. Store the entity, the applicable utility, the customer account, the tariff category taken from the actual bill, the municipality, the meter type, the supply phase, the requested capacity, the application route, the reference format and the expected turnaround, because each utility runs its own process.
Elektroprivreda BiH: Elektroprivreda Bosne i Hercegovine ↗The Indirect Taxation Authority administers value added tax at state level, which is one of the few parts of this structure that does not vary by entity. Configure tax per line, retain the tax source and effective date, and have an adviser approve deposits, staged invoices, variations, credit notes and invoice wording. Do not assume that a single national tax treatment implies a single national energy framework.
Indirect Taxation Authority of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Indirect Taxation Authority ↗Because the regulator, the utility and the applicable rules vary by entity, a proposal is only valid for the jurisdiction it was written for. Store the entity and the rule version on every proposal, and test moving a job recorded against the wrong entity. Reusing a proposal template across the entity boundary without changing the framework reference is the most common avoidable error here.
State Electricity Regulatory Commission: State Electricity Regulatory Commission ↗Connection approval decides when a signed system starts offsetting a bill, and each utility has its own timetable. Store the application submission, the technical conditions issued, queries returned, the resubmission, the approved capacity, fees paid, the inspection, the meter change and the first export reading per utility, and set customer expectations from the actual counterparty rather than from an average.
Elektroprivreda BiH: Elektroprivreda Bosne i Hercegovine ↗Continental conditions with cold winters and hot summers make snow loading and seasonal output genuine engineering inputs. Store the snow loading assumption, the standard referenced, the mounting system and its certification, the fixing detail, the winter output estimate separately from the annual figure, the approving engineer and the date.
Indirect Taxation Authority of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Indirect Taxation Authority ↗Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian are all used in customer documentation, and both Latin and Cyrillic scripts appear. Generate the documents that carry obligations in the language and script the buyer uses, have a fluent reviewer approve the wording, and store the approved version, the sender, the timestamp, the purpose and the delivery status. Test both scripts in the generated PDF.
State Electricity Regulatory Commission: State Electricity Regulatory Commission ↗Commercial and industrial rooftops are a growing segment and buy through procurement with document requirements that may differ by entity. Store the tender reference, the issuing organisation, the entity, the closing date, insurance and certification requirements, the technical and pricing schedules, clarifications, the submission receipt, the outcome, the contract and the agreed service level.
Elektroprivreda BiH: Elektroprivreda Bosne i Hercegovine ↗Equipment is imported and the convertible mark is pegged to the euro, so quotation validity turns on landed cost and supplier lead time rather than exchange volatility. Store the cost basis, the supply assumption, the validity period, the ordered stock and the clearance position, and prevent acceptance at a stale price without approval when a commercial deal takes a quarter to close.
Indirect Taxation Authority of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Indirect Taxation Authority ↗Full reviews
Each review explains the useful workflow, the buyer who should shortlist it, and the country-specific question that a sales demo must answer.
Quickest is first for a narrow single-entity sales adoption goal, and entity routing is the gate it must clear to go wider.
Quickest centres the work a small team usually has to fix first: capture the enquiry, assign an owner, produce a branded proposal quickly and make the next follow up visible. A limited free plan allows an adoption pilot before a larger migration. QuickEstimate owns Quickest and publishes this ranking, so the position depends on the disclosed method rather than on independent market recognition.
No public evidence verifies BAM quoting with validity, Bosnian value added tax handling, entity routing, per-utility connection tracking or multi-script document output. Be precise about scope: a proposal-first tool can serve a team working within one entity and one utility well, and it will misdescribe arrangements the moment the same templates cross an entity boundary without the framework reference changing with them.
Choose it if: the team works within one entity and one utility. Choose another platform if: the company sells across entity boundaries, where routing and rule versions vary by site.
OpenSolar is the strongest free design-first route for Bosnia, and winter output modelling is the check that matters.
OpenSolar publishes design, proposals, table and Kanban project views, custom workflows, actions, schedules, documents, roles, permissions and an API. Continental winters make snow loading and cold weather output genuine engineering inputs, so test seasonal modelling and structural assumptions rather than judging the product on a mild-climate example.
Validate Bosnian imagery, irradiance, snow and temperature handling, winter output modelling, commercial array support, equipment libraries, BAM display, connection stages, field connectivity and multi-language document output. Change a design after acceptance and trace price, stock, tax, payment, structural evidence and handover. Review privacy terms, transfers, support coverage and a complete account export.
Choose it if: design and customer-facing proposals lead the purchase. Choose another platform if: entity routing, rule versions and procurement dominate the requirement list.
Pylon supports a compact design and CRM evaluation, with jurisdiction handling still unverified.
Pylon documents solar and battery design, web and PDF proposals, design history, integrations and a solar CRM add-on. It says new users receive credits for five Standard Projects and teams can add unlimited users. That supports a practical test involving sales, design and management before the buyer assumes it will replace a spreadsheet and a chat group.
Confirm the dollar currency, project rules, CRM cost, payment fees, taxes and renewal. Test Bosnian locations, snow and temperature handling, winter output, commercial load profiles, BAM display, roles and support. Review data processing and export, and model several revisions because a connection outcome frequently changes the design after the first quotation was issued.
Choose it if: the team wants to trial solar design, proposals and CRM together. Choose another platform if: entity routing, rule versions and procurement dominate the requirement list.
Sunbase publishes broad solar CRM scope, and entity-aware procurement plus per-utility milestones is what to test.
Sunbase positions its CRM around solar lead management, sales, communication, proposals, workflow and operational visibility. For a Bosnian contractor selling industrial rooftops across entities, the operational half decides the value: assembling a bid to the right entity's requirements and tracking a connection through the right utility's process.
Ask for comparable customer references and use a controlled demo from tender notice through survey, proposal, deposit, invoice, connection application in two different utilities, procurement, installation, commissioning and service. Verify BAM handling, entity routing, per-utility milestones, document expiry alerts, scheduling, roles, audit history, privacy terms, support hours and data export.
Choose it if: a contractor sells industrial systems across more than one entity. Choose another platform if: a free design tool or a simpler proposal CRM meets the immediate need.
Zoho is the honest recommendation for cross-entity work, because routing and rule versions can be enforced by validation.
Zoho CRM offers configurable modules, fields, pipelines, workflow, reports, mobile apps, portals and APIs, including validation rules and multi-template management. That combination addresses Bosnia's structural problem directly: an entity field that drives the regulator, the utility and the applicable template, with validation that prevents a mismatched combination being saved.
Build or connect consumption assessment, solar design, BAM quotations with validity, value added tax, payment reconciliation, inventory, entity routing, per-utility connection stages, rule versions, multi-script templates, commissioning, assets, warranty and handover. Test processor terms, transfers, retention, API limits, support and a complete export.
Choose it if: the company sells across entity boundaries, which is where the routing problem becomes expensive. Choose another platform if: the team works within one entity and expects ready-made workflows.
Odoo suits a Bosnian contractor whose accounting, stock and project delivery have outgrown a sales tool.
Odoo combines CRM with quotations, sales, accounting, purchasing, inventory, projects, field service and helpdesk, with European localisation work commonly covering Bosnian accounting and value added tax reporting through implementation partners. Because tax is administered at state level while energy rules are not, the accounting side is comparatively straightforward and the routing side is where configuration effort goes.
Verify a current localisation and the value added tax reporting route with the responsible implementation partner. Test BAM quotations, tax treatment, retention on staged contracts, landed cost, stock, serial numbers, field service, approvals, entity and utility evidence, warranty and migration. Connect a specialist design tool and review hosting, backups, upgrades, exit and a restorable export.
Choose it if: accounting, stock, project delivery and CRM should share one suite. Choose another platform if: the business wants a solar-specific proposal product with minimal implementation.
HubSpot is a strong acquisition layer and does nothing about entity routing or connection tracking.
HubSpot's free CRM covers contacts, lead management, forms, email, meetings and pipeline for a small user group. Household solar in the larger Bosnian cities is a competitive, marketing-led business, so forms, sequences and pipeline visibility earn their place on the acquisition side of that work.
Price and test the complete stack: messaging, solar design, BAM quotation with validity, value added tax, payment reconciliation, inventory, entity routing, per-utility connection tracking, multi-script templates and service reporting. Use controlled fields for the entity, the utility, the tariff category, the connection reference and the rule version.
Choose it if: digital acquisition drives a competitive urban residential pipeline. Choose another platform if: entity routing and per-utility connection tracking are the real problems.
Buyer guide
Choose by the most expensive broken handoff, then test that handoff using real opportunities, real users, and the documents your customers actually receive.
Start with Quickest when slow quoting and unowned follow up are the visible failures on household work in one entity. Use the free plan on real Bosnian opportunities. Continue only if the vendor proves BAM quoting with validity, VAT, entity routing, per-utility connection tracking, multi-script output, privacy, support and export.
OpenSolar fits a team that needs solar design, proposals and project CRM before it can fund a wider stack. Validate Bosnian imagery, irradiance inputs, snow loading and winter output modelling, commercial array support, BAM display, connection stages, data terms and mobile performance in mountainous municipalities.
Pylon is worth testing when web and PDF proposals, solar and battery design and an optional solar CRM all appeal. Confirm the displayed currency, Bosnian model inputs, snow and winter output handling, revision economics, mobile use, permissions, support hours and the evidence produced at handover.
Sunbase targets broader solar sales and operational workflows, which suits a contractor selling industrial rooftops across entities where procurement and connection processes differ. Ask for comparable references and test entity-aware procurement, per-utility connection milestones, document expiry alerts, scheduling, privacy, commissioning and export.
A configurable platform is the honest recommendation for any company selling across entity boundaries, because the regulator, utility and rules all vary by site. Odoo is stronger where accounting, inventory and project accounting dominate; Zoho is the more familiar CRM route with strong custom objects, validation rules and multi-template management.
HubSpot fits a business whose first priority is forms, campaigns, email, meetings and pipeline visibility, which suits a household installer competing on digital acquisition in one urban area. Budget the solar design, quotation, VAT, entity routing, connection tracking and service tools around it.
Run the same three opportunities in every shortlisted CRM: one ordinary lead, one revision-heavy project, and one deal that already failed. This removes demo theatre and exposes repeated entry, stale documents, weak mobile adoption, and missing local support.
Capture a real lead, assign it, create the proposal, schedule follow-up, record acceptance, and hand it to delivery.
Change the system, equipment, price, payment route, and installation date. Identify every stale record.
Use a duplicate, missed follow-up, rejected proposal, or delayed job and ask the CRM to show what happens next.
Store the entity on every site record and let it drive the applicable regulator, utility, application route, reference format and expected turnaround. Test a job recorded against the wrong entity and confirm the correction updates the routing rather than leaving a stale reference. This is the single most consequential configuration decision in this market.
Produce a taxable sale with separate lines for imported equipment, structural work and services, plus a deposit, a staged invoice, a variation, a credit note, a refund and a warranty replacement in BAM. Store a validity period, the cost basis and the supply assumption, and block acceptance at a stale price without approval.
Store the entity and the rule version on every proposal, and prevent a template written for one jurisdiction being reused for another without updating the framework reference. Test producing a list of every open proposal by entity and rule version, because that report is what prevents describing an arrangement a customer cannot obtain.
Treat each connection application as its own record with a reference, an owner, a submission date, a document set and a dated outcome, held against the applicable utility. Capture the technical conditions issued, queries returned, the resubmission, the approved capacity, fees paid, the inspection, the meter change and the first export reading, and set customer expectations per utility rather than from an average.
Configure tax per line, retain the tax source and effective date, and have an adviser approve deposits, staged invoices, retention, variations, credit notes and invoice wording. Record explicitly that tax is administered at state level while energy rules are not, so that neither assumption contaminates the other in configuration.
Store the snow loading assumption, the standard referenced, the mounting system and its certification, the fixing detail, the winter output estimate separately from the annual figure, the approving engineer and the date. Test a design change after acceptance and confirm the new output, price and acknowledgement all propagate.
Generate the quotation, the acceptance, payment requests, warranty terms and handover instructions in the language and script the buyer uses. Have a fluent reviewer approve each variant, store the approved version, the sender, the timestamp, the purpose and the delivery status, and test both Latin and Cyrillic rendering in the generated PDF.
Store the tender reference, the issuing organisation, the entity, the closing date, insurance and certification requirements, the technical and pricing schedules, clarifications, the submission receipt, the outcome, the contract and the agreed service level. Set alerts against document and insurance expiry, and confirm that requirements differing by entity are captured separately.
Export the accepted scope, variations, the as-built design, the structural and snow loading evidence, installed equipment and serial numbers, photographs, test results, commissioning, regulator and utility evidence naming the entity, invoices and payment status, warranties, manuals, monitoring access, training, signatures, open defects and the service contact.
The real budget
Bosnian pricing is stable because the convertible mark is pegged to the euro, which moves the evaluation onto jurisdiction routing and compliance rather than currency handling. Quickest publishes INR terms, OpenSolar describes its core platform as free, Pylon shows dollar prices whose billing currency should be confirmed, and Zoho publishes USD global tiers. Sunbase needs a quote for the relevant scope. Odoo and HubSpot vary by apps, seats, contacts and implementation. Ask for billing currency, taxes, payment method, bank charges, users, projects, storage, integrations, messaging, onboarding, support hours, renewal and exit.
Free: 1 user and 10 proposals monthly. Pro: INR 6,999 per user yearly, minimum 3 users.
OpenSolar says partners fund the model; review services and connected costs.
New users receive five Standard Project credits; confirm Bosnia commercial terms.
Request Bosnia users, modules, implementation, integrations, support and renewal pricing.
Quickest lists one free user with ten proposals monthly and Pro at INR 6,999 per user yearly with a three-user minimum. Bosnian commercial and tax terms are unverified.
OpenSolar states that its core platform is free because partners fund the model. Review partner choices, paid services, data use, support coverage and connected system costs.
Pylon offers five Standard Project credits to new users and states unlimited team users. Confirm the displayed currency, the CRM add-on, payment fees, project rules and renewal.
Zoho's reviewed page offers three free users alongside paid USD tiers. HubSpot states up to two free users and 1,000 contacts. Neither free plan supplies a complete Bosnian solar operating stack.
Budget accounting, payment handling, messaging, design software, structural engineering input, implementation, field devices, storage, support and administration alongside the licence fee.
Compare the cost of one complete acceptance case rather than a feature checklist, and price one misrouted application alongside it. A job filed under the wrong entity's process can add weeks and require a resubmission, and the controlled field that prevents it costs nothing to maintain.
Ask what happens when a proposal template written for one entity is used for another. The commercial proposal should identify validation, warnings, reporting by entity, data ownership and support escalation.
Our number-one pick
Quickest concentrates on lead ownership, a mobile proposal and the next follow up, which is a practical first adoption target for a small Bosnian sales team working within one entity.
Its free plan lets one person test ten monthly proposals before the company commits to migration, custom integration or additional seats.
First place stays conditional on proof, and entity routing is the specific gate: BAM handling, VAT, per-utility connection tracking and multi-script output are all unverified.
Your next move
Start with Quickest and the specialist closest to your largest local requirement. Use the same evidence and test deals for both.
Name the bottleneck. Pick lead response, proposal speed, design, payment, install handoff, or management visibility.
Choose two tools. Compare Quickest with the strongest specialist for that bottleneck.
Run the Three-Deal Proof. Score adoption, repeated entry, revision handling, support, and full annual cost.
Research record
These sources support the market, regulatory, product, and pricing statements on this page. Product terms can change after the checked date.
Common questions
Quickest is first under our proposal-first adoption lens for a small team working within one entity, but QuickEstimate owns it and Bosnian localisation is unverified. OpenSolar is the better free design-first option. If you sell across entity boundaries, a configurable platform is the honest recommendation, because the regulator, utility and rules all vary by site.
Because energy governance is layered: a state-level regulator sits alongside entity-level regulators, and more than one utility serves different parts of the country. The applicable regulator, connection counterparty and customer generation rules are therefore properties of the site rather than of your company, and a single assumption for each will misroute work.
We found no verified public evidence for native BAM proposals or Bosnian value added tax handling. Quickest's published evidence is India-first. Require a live taxable quotation with a validity period, a deposit, a staged invoice, a credit note, a refund and an accounting export during the demo, plus written billing and support terms.
Store the entity and the rule version on every proposal, and prevent a template written for one jurisdiction being reused for another without updating the framework reference. Test producing a list of open proposals by entity and rule version, because that report prevents describing an arrangement a customer cannot actually obtain.
Per utility, each as its own record with a reference, an owner, a submission date, a document set and a dated outcome, plus the technical conditions issued, queries returned, the resubmission, the approved capacity, fees paid, the inspection, the meter change and the first export reading. Set expectations from the actual counterparty, not an average.
Value added tax is administered at state level through the Indirect Taxation Authority, which is one of the few parts of this structure that does not vary by entity. Record that distinction explicitly in your configuration so that a single national tax treatment is not mistaken for a single national energy framework.
For documents that carry obligations, generate them in the language and script the buyer uses. Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian all appear and both Latin and Cyrillic are in use, so have a fluent reviewer approve each variant and test both scripts in the generated PDF rather than only in a browser preview.
Yes. Store the winter output estimate separately from the annual figure, along with the snow loading assumption, the standard referenced and the months modelled. Continental winters make an annual average an incomplete description, and customers evaluate a system on the season when they needed it most.
Include the accepted scope, variations, the as-built design, the structural and snow loading evidence, installed equipment and serial numbers, photographs, test results, commissioning, regulator and utility evidence naming the entity, invoices and payment status, warranties, manuals, monitoring access, training, signatures, open defects and the service contact.
Use the Three-Deal Proof and require every vendor to show the same lead, revision, document, and failed handoff.